From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Dag Brattli <dagb@fast.no>
Cc: jt@hpl.hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [RANT] Linux-IrDA status
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 22:24:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001110222416.B300@bug.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10011072316180.15590-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <200011081215.MAA69418@tepid.osl.fast.no>
In-Reply-To: <200011081215.MAA69418@tepid.osl.fast.no>; from Dag Brattli on Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 12:15:48PM +0000
Hi!
> Some options:
>
> 1) Split up the large patch and fix the things you didn't like, submit them
> with better discription. But then It's probably to late anyway for 2.4 (even if
> the 2.4-test series is not the most stable stuff I've tried). Is it
> to late for this?
Probably not. Get tytso to agree that broken IrDA is critical bug,
split patches, and see them accepted.
> 2) Remove IrDA from the kernel, and we'll go back to using CVS and
> make our own package (like PCMCIA and IrDA was before they got
> into the kernel. At least PCMCIA used to work back then ;-)
Do not do that, please.
> 3) Just apply the stuff!?! Look at Jean's mail for description of
> the changes.
Pavel
--
I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-10 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10011072030070.15254-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
2000-11-08 5:08 ` [RANT] Linux-IrDA status Michael Rothwell
2000-11-08 5:23 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <20001109192404.B25828@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
2000-11-10 3:50 ` The IrDA patches !!! (+ more flames) Jean Tourrilhes
2000-11-10 19:56 ` The IrDA patches !!! (was Re: [RANT] Linux-IrDA status) Linus Torvalds
2000-11-10 21:25 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2000-11-12 2:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-11-12 3:12 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2000-11-11 12:04 ` Horst von Brand
2000-11-08 7:26 ` [RANT] Linux-IrDA status Linus Torvalds
2000-11-08 8:14 ` Russell King
2000-11-08 12:15 ` [RANT] Linux-IrDA status, " Dag Brattli
2000-11-10 21:24 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2000-11-08 12:31 ` Michael Rothwell
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10011072027520.15254-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
[not found] ` <200011081204.MAA68767@tepid.osl.fast.no>
2000-11-08 18:20 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2000-11-08 1:14 Jean Tourrilhes
[not found] ` <3A08AB56.10BD5007@mandrakesoft.com>
2000-11-08 1:38 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2000-11-08 8:12 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001110222416.B300@bug.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dagb@fast.no \
--cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).