* RE: Linux-2.4.5 and Reiserfs, oops!
@ 2001-05-27 5:36 Chris Rankin
2001-05-27 5:59 ` Alexander Viro
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Rankin @ 2001-05-27 5:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: viro, linux-kernel
Hi,
Thanks for the patch; I successfully unmounted my reiserfs USB Zip 250
MB disc. However, the box then locked up hard when I unmounted an NFS
mount and tried to switch to another virtual console.
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: Linux-2.4.5 and Reiserfs, oops!
2001-05-27 5:36 Linux-2.4.5 and Reiserfs, oops! Chris Rankin
@ 2001-05-27 5:59 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-27 6:57 ` Chris Rankin
2001-05-27 8:13 ` Chris Rankin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Viro @ 2001-05-27 5:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Rankin; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sat, 26 May 2001, Chris Rankin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the patch; I successfully unmounted my reiserfs USB Zip 250
> MB disc. However, the box then locked up hard when I unmounted an NFS
> mount and tried to switch to another virtual console.
That's... interesting. With that patch changes to fs/super.c should make
no difference whatsoever.
OK, can you reproduce NFS lockup on 2.4.5-pre5 (without that patch)
and on 2.4.5-pre3 (ditto)?
There were NFS changes in -pre4 and -pre5 and umount ones in -pre6. The
latter need the patch I've posted, so vanilla -pre5 and -pre3 are the
first candidates for checking.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Linux-2.4.5 and Reiserfs, oops!
2001-05-27 5:59 ` Alexander Viro
@ 2001-05-27 6:57 ` Chris Rankin
2001-05-27 7:14 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-27 8:13 ` Chris Rankin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Rankin @ 2001-05-27 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Viro; +Cc: linux-kernel
> That's... interesting. With that patch changes to fs/super.c should make
> no difference whatsoever.
>
> OK, can you reproduce NFS lockup on 2.4.5-pre5 (without that patch)
> and on 2.4.5-pre3 (ditto)?
>
> There were NFS changes in -pre4 and -pre5 and umount ones in -pre6. The
> latter need the patch I've posted, so vanilla -pre5 and -pre3 are the
> first candidates for checking.
Well the first thing I checked was vanilla 2.4.5, and I managed to
bring that down hard too. It has nothing at all to do with reiserfs,
but may be related to USB instead. I have been able to reproduce the
problem by doing the following:
a) Booting with X on vc/2
b) Logging into vc/6 instead
c) Mounting a filesystem on my USB Zip drive
d) Unmounting the filesystem again
e) Unmounting the NFS mount
f) Executing "rmmod -a" twice to clean out the now-unused modules
(e.g. sd_mod, scsi_mod, usb-storage)
g) Trying to switch back to vc/2
h) Oops!
2.4.4 seems OK; I guess I'll have to build those -pre kernels now.
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Linux-2.4.5 and Reiserfs, oops!
2001-05-27 6:57 ` Chris Rankin
@ 2001-05-27 7:14 ` Alexander Viro
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Viro @ 2001-05-27 7:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Rankin; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sat, 26 May 2001, Chris Rankin wrote:
> Well the first thing I checked was vanilla 2.4.5, and I managed to
> bring that down hard too. It has nothing at all to do with reiserfs,
> but may be related to USB instead. I have been able to reproduce the
> problem by doing the following:
>
> a) Booting with X on vc/2
> b) Logging into vc/6 instead
> c) Mounting a filesystem on my USB Zip drive
> d) Unmounting the filesystem again
> e) Unmounting the NFS mount
> f) Executing "rmmod -a" twice to clean out the now-unused modules
> (e.g. sd_mod, scsi_mod, usb-storage)
> g) Trying to switch back to vc/2
> h) Oops!
>
> 2.4.4 seems OK; I guess I'll have to build those -pre kernels now.
Interesting. See Pete's posting in thread about USB problems - it
may be related.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Linux-2.4.5 and Reiserfs, oops!
2001-05-27 5:59 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-27 6:57 ` Chris Rankin
@ 2001-05-27 8:13 ` Chris Rankin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Rankin @ 2001-05-27 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Viro; +Cc: linux-kernel
I have now reproduced the lockup in 2.4.4, having passed the
additional boot parameters "nmi_watchdog=1 noapic".
To be more specific, it happens when switching from a vc running a
text console to the vc running X. I'm thinking that maybe the umount
NFS is a coincidence / red herring.
Chris
My video card is a Matrox G400 AGP 32MB with TV-OUT, and I'm not using
the frame buffer driver.
> On Sat, 26 May 2001, Chris Rankin wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the patch; I successfully unmounted my reiserfs USB Zip 250
> > MB disc. However, the box then locked up hard when I unmounted an NFS
> > mount and tried to switch to another virtual console.
>
> That's... interesting. With that patch changes to fs/super.c should make
> no difference whatsoever.
>
> OK, can you reproduce NFS lockup on 2.4.5-pre5 (without that patch)
> and on 2.4.5-pre3 (ditto)?
>
> There were NFS changes in -pre4 and -pre5 and umount ones in -pre6. The
> latter need the patch I've posted, so vanilla -pre5 and -pre3 are the
> first candidates for checking.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-05-27 8:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-05-27 5:36 Linux-2.4.5 and Reiserfs, oops! Chris Rankin
2001-05-27 5:59 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-27 6:57 ` Chris Rankin
2001-05-27 7:14 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-27 8:13 ` Chris Rankin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).