* XFS and Alan kernel tree @ 2001-05-05 21:08 Daniel Podlejski 2001-05-06 2:29 ` Keith Owens ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Daniel Podlejski @ 2001-05-05 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel I merge XFS witch Alan tree (2.4.4-ac5). It's seems to be stable. Patch against Alan tree is avaliable at: http://www.underley.eu.org/linux/patch.ac-xfs.diff.bz2 It's 1.0 SGI release. Only XFS, pagebuf and POSIX ACLs code, without KDB. -- Daniel Podlejski <underley@underley.eu.org> ... You can check out any time you like But you can never leave ... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: XFS and Alan kernel tree 2001-05-05 21:08 XFS and Alan kernel tree Daniel Podlejski @ 2001-05-06 2:29 ` Keith Owens 2001-05-06 21:54 ` Norbert Tretkowski 2001-06-12 22:25 ` Daniel Stone 2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Keith Owens @ 2001-05-06 2:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Podlejski; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-xfs On Sat, 5 May 2001 23:08:16 +0200, Daniel Podlejski <underley@underley.eu.org> wrote: >I merge XFS witch Alan tree (2.4.4-ac5). It's seems to be stable. >Patch against Alan tree is avaliable at: > >http://www.underley.eu.org/linux/patch.ac-xfs.diff.bz2 > >It's 1.0 SGI release. Only XFS, pagebuf and POSIX ACLs code, without KDB. linux-xfs added to cc: list. Could you try adding ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/kdb/download/ix86/kdb-v1.8-2.4.4-ac5.gz to your patch? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: XFS and Alan kernel tree 2001-05-05 21:08 XFS and Alan kernel tree Daniel Podlejski 2001-05-06 2:29 ` Keith Owens @ 2001-05-06 21:54 ` Norbert Tretkowski 2001-06-12 22:25 ` Daniel Stone 2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Norbert Tretkowski @ 2001-05-06 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel * Daniel Podlejski <underley@underley.eu.org> wrote: > I merge XFS witch Alan tree (2.4.4-ac5). It's seems to be stable. ld -m elf_i386 -r -o fs.o open.o read_write.o devices.o file_table.o buffer.o super.o block_dev.o stat.o exec.o pipe.o namei.o fcntl.o ioctl.o readdir.o select.o fifo.o locks.o dcache.o inode.o attr.o bad_inode.o file.o iobuf.o dnotify.o filesystems.o noquot.o ext_attr.o noposix_acl.o binfmt_script.o binfmt_elf.o proc/proc.o partitions/partitions.o ext2/ext2.o nls/nls.o ld: cannot open noposix_acl.o: No such file or directory make[2]: *** [fs.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.4-ac5-xfs/fs' make[1]: *** [first_rule] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.4-ac5-xfs/fs' make: *** [_dir_fs] Error 2 Norbert ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: XFS and Alan kernel tree 2001-05-05 21:08 XFS and Alan kernel tree Daniel Podlejski 2001-05-06 2:29 ` Keith Owens 2001-05-06 21:54 ` Norbert Tretkowski @ 2001-06-12 22:25 ` Daniel Stone 2001-06-12 23:03 ` Keith Owens 2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Daniel Stone @ 2001-06-12 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Podlejski; +Cc: linux-kernel On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 11:08:16PM +0200, Daniel Podlejski wrote: > I merge XFS witch Alan tree (2.4.4-ac5). It's seems to be stable. > Patch against Alan tree is avaliable at: Hi Daniel, I've got a KDB patch against a relatively recent 2.4.5-ac6, but are you still continuing your porting effort to the -ac series? Thanks, d -- Daniel Stone <daniel@kabuki.openfridge.net> <daniel@kabuki.sfarc.net> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: XFS and Alan kernel tree 2001-06-12 22:25 ` Daniel Stone @ 2001-06-12 23:03 ` Keith Owens 2001-06-12 23:15 ` Daniel Stone 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Keith Owens @ 2001-06-12 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Stone; +Cc: Daniel Podlejski, linux-kernel On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:25:52 +1000, Daniel Stone <daniel@kabuki.sfarc.net> wrote: >On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 11:08:16PM +0200, Daniel Podlejski wrote: >> I merge XFS witch Alan tree (2.4.4-ac5). It's seems to be stable. >> Patch against Alan tree is avaliable at: > >Hi Daniel, >I've got a KDB patch against a relatively recent 2.4.5-ac6, but are you >still continuing your porting effort to the -ac series? kdb v1.8-2.4.5-ac6 works for -ac6 through -ac13. None of the changes in that series affect kdb. There have been some significant changes to page I/O handling in 2.4.6-pre[12] which are reflected in the XFS CVS tree. -ac13 is still using the old page_launder() code which is not as clean. In addition kdb for Linus's and AC's trees has diverged quite a bit because of the console and NMI cleanup in -ac. Fitting XFS from CVS into -ac13 will be very nasty, you might want to wait until AC syncs to Linus's kernel or Linus takes some of the -ac changes. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: XFS and Alan kernel tree 2001-06-12 23:03 ` Keith Owens @ 2001-06-12 23:15 ` Daniel Stone 2001-06-13 2:40 ` Shawn 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Daniel Stone @ 2001-06-12 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Keith Owens; +Cc: Daniel Stone, Daniel Podlejski, linux-kernel On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 09:03:16AM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:25:52 +1000, > Daniel Stone <daniel@kabuki.sfarc.net> wrote: > >On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 11:08:16PM +0200, Daniel Podlejski wrote: > >> I merge XFS witch Alan tree (2.4.4-ac5). It's seems to be stable. > >> Patch against Alan tree is avaliable at: > > > >Hi Daniel, > >I've got a KDB patch against a relatively recent 2.4.5-ac6, but are you > >still continuing your porting effort to the -ac series? > > kdb v1.8-2.4.5-ac6 works for -ac6 through -ac13. None of the changes > in that series affect kdb. > > There have been some significant changes to page I/O handling in > 2.4.6-pre[12] which are reflected in the XFS CVS tree. -ac13 is still > using the old page_launder() code which is not as clean. In addition > kdb for Linus's and AC's trees has diverged quite a bit because of the > console and NMI cleanup in -ac. Fitting XFS from CVS into -ac13 will > be very nasty, you might want to wait until AC syncs to Linus's kernel > or Linus takes some of the -ac changes. Hmm, I've got Rik's page_launder patch which was posted to lkml a couple of days ago, and hand-hacked that into ac. I got the CVS tree and manually hacked out 2.4.6-pre2, but with 22 different files with rejects when I tried to put -ac in, I just gave up. d -- Daniel Stone <daniel@kabuki.openfridge.net> <daniel@kabuki.sfarc.net> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: XFS and Alan kernel tree 2001-06-12 23:15 ` Daniel Stone @ 2001-06-13 2:40 ` Shawn 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Shawn @ 2001-06-13 2:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Keith Owens, Daniel Stone, Daniel Podlejski, linux-kernel On 06/12, Daniel Stone rearranged the electrons to read: > Hmm, I've got Rik's page_launder patch which was posted to lkml a couple of > days ago, and hand-hacked that into ac. I got the CVS tree and manually > hacked out 2.4.6-pre2, but with 22 different files with rejects when I tried > to put -ac in, I just gave up. Sounds like my experience with it. I can do 5 to maybe even ten rejects if they're no-thinkos, but this was a buttload of whammies. -- Hob Goblin core@enodev.com I spilled Spot Remover on my dog... Now he's gone. -- Stephen Wright ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-06-13 2:40 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2001-05-05 21:08 XFS and Alan kernel tree Daniel Podlejski 2001-05-06 2:29 ` Keith Owens 2001-05-06 21:54 ` Norbert Tretkowski 2001-06-12 22:25 ` Daniel Stone 2001-06-12 23:03 ` Keith Owens 2001-06-12 23:15 ` Daniel Stone 2001-06-13 2:40 ` Shawn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).