From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
To: John Alvord <jalvo@mbay.net>
Cc: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolinux.com>,
"Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu>,
Ben LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>,
Ragnar Kjxrstad <kernel@ragnark.vestdata.no>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mike@bigstorage.com, kevin@bigstorage.com, linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 64 bit scsi read/write
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 18:07:52 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010715180752.B7993@weta.f00f.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0107142304010.17541-100000@otter.mbay.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0107142304010.17541-100000@otter.mbay.net>
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 11:05:36PM -0700, John Alvord wrote:
In the IBM solution to this (1977-78, VM/CMS) the critical data was
written at the begining and the end of the block. If the two data items
didn't match then the block was rejected.
Neat.
Simple and effective. Presumably you can also checksum the block, and
check that.
--cw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-15 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-01 4:53 [RFC][PATCH] first cut 64 bit block support Ben LaHaise
2001-07-03 4:53 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-07-04 2:19 ` [PATCH] 64 bit scsi read/write Ben LaHaise
2001-07-04 7:11 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-05 6:34 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-07-05 7:35 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-07-13 18:20 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-07-13 20:41 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-07-13 21:07 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-13 22:04 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-07-14 0:49 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-14 12:27 ` Paul Jakma
2001-07-14 14:48 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-14 15:42 ` Paul Jakma
2001-07-14 17:18 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-20 17:03 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-07-16 18:53 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-07-16 19:13 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-07-13 21:14 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-14 3:23 ` Andrew Morton
2001-07-14 8:45 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-14 14:50 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-14 20:11 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-15 1:21 ` Andrew Morton
2001-07-15 1:53 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-15 3:36 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-15 6:05 ` John Alvord
2001-07-15 6:07 ` Chris Wedgwood [this message]
2001-07-15 13:16 ` Ken Hirsch
2001-07-15 14:50 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-15 22:14 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-17 0:31 ` Juan Quintela
2001-07-15 13:44 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-15 14:39 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-15 15:32 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-15 15:33 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-15 16:24 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-15 15:06 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-15 15:22 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-15 17:44 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-15 17:47 ` Justin T. Gibbs
2001-07-15 23:14 ` Rod Van Meter
2001-07-16 0:37 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-16 15:11 ` Rod Van Meter
2001-07-16 8:56 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-16 13:19 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-16 1:08 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-07-16 8:49 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-21 19:18 ` Alexander Griesser
2001-07-22 3:52 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-07-23 14:41 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 4:29 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-07-24 11:45 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-14 15:41 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-14 17:00 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-14 17:33 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-15 4:02 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-15 5:46 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-15 17:10 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-15 17:39 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-26 2:18 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-07-26 16:24 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-08-10 19:42 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-10 19:51 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-08-10 20:02 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-11 0:18 ` Steve Lord
2001-08-11 21:44 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-07-04 10:16 ` [RFC][PATCH] first cut 64 bit block support Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-04 16:59 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-07-14 15:08 [PATCH] 64 bit scsi read/write Ed Tomlinson
2001-07-19 7:35 [PATCH] 64 bit SCSI read/write Andre Hedrick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010715180752.B7993@weta.f00f.org \
--to=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=acahalan@cs.uml.edu \
--cc=adilger@turbolinux.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andrewm@uow.edu.au \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=jalvo@mbay.net \
--cc=kernel@ragnark.vestdata.no \
--cc=kevin@bigstorage.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
--cc=mike@bigstorage.com \
--cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).