* 2.4.10-pre5
@ 2001-09-08 5:12 Garst R. Reese
2001-09-08 6:14 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Kingsley Foreman
2001-09-08 10:36 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Peter Osterlund
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Garst R. Reese @ 2001-09-08 5:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: torvalds
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 59 bytes --]
gcc-3.0
log should be self explanatory.
cc me if rqd.
Garst
[-- Attachment #2: makemodules.log --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 810 bytes --]
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/block'
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i586 -DMODULE -c -o rd.o rd.c
rd.c: In function `rd_ioctl':
rd.c:262: invalid type argument of `->'
rd.c: In function `rd_cleanup':
rd.c:375: too few arguments to function `blkdev_put'
make[2]: *** [rd.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/block'
make[1]: *** [_modsubdir_block] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers'
make: *** [_mod_drivers] Error 2
Command exited with non-zero status 2
4.13user 0.37system 0:04.50elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (3849major+4162minor)pagefaults 0swaps
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.10-pre5
2001-09-08 5:12 2.4.10-pre5 Garst R. Reese
@ 2001-09-08 6:14 ` Kingsley Foreman
2001-09-08 6:46 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Josh McKinney
2001-09-08 13:05 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Alan Cox
2001-09-08 10:36 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Peter Osterlund
1 sibling, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Kingsley Foreman @ 2001-09-08 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Yes i got this too
anyone got a fix
----- Original Message -----
From: "Garst R. Reese" <reese@isn.net>
To: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 2:42 PM
Subject: 2.4.10-pre5
> gcc-3.0
> log should be self explanatory.
> cc me if rqd.
> Garst
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/block'
>
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-tri
graphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpre
ferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i586 -DMODULE -c -o rd.o rd.c
> rd.c: In function `rd_ioctl':
> rd.c:262: invalid type argument of `->'
> rd.c: In function `rd_cleanup':
> rd.c:375: too few arguments to function `blkdev_put'
> make[2]: *** [rd.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/block'
> make[1]: *** [_modsubdir_block] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers'
> make: *** [_mod_drivers] Error 2
> Command exited with non-zero status 2
> 4.13user 0.37system 0:04.50elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
0maxresident)k
> 0inputs+0outputs (3849major+4162minor)pagefaults 0swaps
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.10-pre5
2001-09-08 6:14 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Kingsley Foreman
@ 2001-09-08 6:46 ` Josh McKinney
2001-09-08 8:19 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Nicholas Knight
2001-09-08 9:32 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Eyal Lebedinsky
2001-09-08 13:05 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Alan Cox
1 sibling, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Josh McKinney @ 2001-09-08 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
On approximately Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 03:44:31PM +0930, Kingsley Foreman wrote:
> Yes i got this too
> anyone got a fix
Don't use gcc-3.0
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Garst R. Reese" <reese@isn.net>
> To: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: <torvalds@transmeta.com>
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 2:42 PM
> Subject: 2.4.10-pre5
>
>
> > gcc-3.0
> > log should be self explanatory.
> > cc me if rqd.
> > Garst
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
>
> > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/block'
> >
> gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-tri
> graphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpre
> ferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i586 -DMODULE -c -o rd.o rd.c
> > rd.c: In function `rd_ioctl':
> > rd.c:262: invalid type argument of `->'
> > rd.c: In function `rd_cleanup':
> > rd.c:375: too few arguments to function `blkdev_put'
> > make[2]: *** [rd.o] Error 1
> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/block'
> > make[1]: *** [_modsubdir_block] Error 2
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers'
> > make: *** [_mod_drivers] Error 2
> > Command exited with non-zero status 2
> > 4.13user 0.37system 0:04.50elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
> 0maxresident)k
> > 0inputs+0outputs (3849major+4162minor)pagefaults 0swaps
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Linux, the choice | Stupidity is its own reward.
of a GNU generation -o) |
Kernel 2.4.9-ac1 /\ |
on a i586 _\_v |
|
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.10-pre5
2001-09-08 6:46 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Josh McKinney
@ 2001-09-08 8:19 ` Nicholas Knight
2001-09-08 9:32 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Eyal Lebedinsky
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Nicholas Knight @ 2001-09-08 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
On Friday 07 September 2001 11:46 pm, Josh McKinney wrote:
> On approximately Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 03:44:31PM +0930, Kingsley
Foreman wrote:
> > Yes i got this too
> > anyone got a fix
>
> Don't use gcc-3.0
Excuse me, but shouldn't it be a goal to have the kernel compiling
cleanly on gcc-3.0 as soon as is reasonable?
Telling people to use older versions of GCC for the kernel is not really
a "good" thing if it can be avoided.
Personaly I don't use gcc-3.0 yet, but some do, and many will follow, and
when they do, it'd be nice to have the kernel compiling cleanly, would it
not?
They want a fix, not a one-line editorial. They're reporting a "bug", so
that it may be fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.10-pre5
2001-09-08 6:46 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Josh McKinney
2001-09-08 8:19 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Nicholas Knight
@ 2001-09-08 9:32 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Eyal Lebedinsky @ 2001-09-08 9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josh McKinney; +Cc: linux-kernel
Josh McKinney wrote:
>
> On approximately Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 03:44:31PM +0930, Kingsley Foreman wrote:
> > Yes i got this too
> > anyone got a fix
> Don't use gcc-3.0
No need to jump the gun, this is a real problem, unrelated to gcc-3.0.
I get the same error with Debian stable 2.2.r3
$ gcc --version
2.95.2
--
Eyal Lebedinsky (eyal@eyal.emu.id.au) <http://samba.anu.edu.au/eyal/>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.10-pre5
2001-09-08 5:12 2.4.10-pre5 Garst R. Reese
2001-09-08 6:14 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Kingsley Foreman
@ 2001-09-08 10:36 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-09-08 12:57 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Garst R. Reese
2001-09-09 5:30 ` 2.4.10-pre5/pre6 Garst R. Reese
1 sibling, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peter Osterlund @ 2001-09-08 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Garst R. Reese; +Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, Alexander Viro
"Garst R. Reese" <reese@isn.net> writes:
> Garstmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/block'
> gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i586 -DMODULE -c -o rd.o rd.c
> rd.c: In function `rd_ioctl':
> rd.c:262: invalid type argument of `->'
> rd.c: In function `rd_cleanup':
> rd.c:375: too few arguments to function `blkdev_put'
> make[2]: *** [rd.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/block'
> make[1]: *** [_modsubdir_block] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers'
> make: *** [_mod_drivers] Error 2
> Command exited with non-zero status 2
This patch seems to work:
--- linux/drivers/block/rd.c.orig Sat Sep 8 11:58:19 2001
+++ linux/drivers/block/rd.c Sat Sep 8 12:21:50 2001
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@
/* special: we want to release the ramdisk memory,
it's not like with the other blockdevices where
this ioctl only flushes away the buffer cache. */
- if ((atomic_read(rd_bdev[minor]->bd_openers) > 2))
+ if ((atomic_read(&rd_bdev[minor]->bd_openers) > 2))
return -EBUSY;
destroy_buffers(inode->i_rdev);
rd_blocksizes[minor] = 0;
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@
struct block_device *bdev = rd_bdev[i];
rd_bdev[i] = NULL;
if (bdev) {
- blkdev_put(bdev);
+ blkdev_put(bdev, BDEV_FILE);
bdput(bdev);
}
destroy_buffers(MKDEV(MAJOR_NR, i));
--
Peter Österlund petero2@telia.com
Sköndalsvägen 35 http://w1.894.telia.com/~u89404340
S-128 66 Sköndal +46 8 942647
Sweden
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.10-pre5
2001-09-08 10:36 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Peter Osterlund
@ 2001-09-08 12:57 ` Garst R. Reese
2001-09-09 5:30 ` 2.4.10-pre5/pre6 Garst R. Reese
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Garst R. Reese @ 2001-09-08 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Osterlund; +Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, Alexander Viro
Peter Osterlund wrote:
>
> "Garst R. Reese" <reese@isn.net> writes:
>
> > Garstmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/block'
> > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i586 -DMODULE -c -o rd.o rd.c
> > rd.c: In function `rd_ioctl':
> > rd.c:262: invalid type argument of `->'
> > rd.c: In function `rd_cleanup':
> > rd.c:375: too few arguments to function `blkdev_put'
> > make[2]: *** [rd.o] Error 1
> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/block'
> > make[1]: *** [_modsubdir_block] Error 2
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers'
> > make: *** [_mod_drivers] Error 2
> > Command exited with non-zero status 2
>
> This patch seems to work:
Yes, it compiled, but Netscape-4.75 either kills it, or locks up.
So there are other problems.
Nothing in logs. booting back to pre2 is ok
Garst
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.10-pre5
2001-09-08 6:14 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Kingsley Foreman
2001-09-08 6:46 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Josh McKinney
@ 2001-09-08 13:05 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-08 22:03 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Alessandro Suardi
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2001-09-08 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kingsley Foreman; +Cc: linux-kernel
> ferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i586 -DMODULE -c -o rd.o rd.c
> > rd.c: In function `rd_ioctl':
> > rd.c:262: invalid type argument of `->'
> > rd.c: In function `rd_cleanup':
> > rd.c:375: too few arguments to function `blkdev_put'
2.4.10pre5 doesnt compile for rd. It looks like the same error I got when
I applied Al's patch to -ac (and thus took it back out)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.10-pre5
2001-09-08 13:05 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Alan Cox
@ 2001-09-08 22:03 ` Alessandro Suardi
2001-09-09 4:05 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Josh McKinney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Alessandro Suardi @ 2001-09-08 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Alan Cox, Kingsley Foreman
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > ferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i586 -DMODULE -c -o rd.o rd.c
> > > rd.c: In function `rd_ioctl':
> > > rd.c:262: invalid type argument of `->'
> > > rd.c: In function `rd_cleanup':
> > > rd.c:375: too few arguments to function `blkdev_put'
>
> 2.4.10pre5 doesnt compile for rd. It looks like the same error I got when
> I applied Al's patch to -ac (and thus took it back out)
Just in case anybody wondered it doesn't compile with gcc-3.0.1 either.
--alessandro
"this is no time to get cute, it's a mad dog's promenade
so walk tall, or baby don't walk at all"
(Bruce Springsteen, 'New York City Serenade')
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.10-pre5
2001-09-08 22:03 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Alessandro Suardi
@ 2001-09-09 4:05 ` Josh McKinney
2001-09-09 4:14 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Steven Walter
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Josh McKinney @ 2001-09-09 4:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Since I have gotten a decent amount of flame mail from my one-liner posted
yesterday, I am just curious. Has anyone really been able to successfully
compile their kernel with gcc-3*. I did once or twice long before it was
released, but it dies on the same error everytime. I posted it to the
GCC mailing list because it was an internal compiler error, but it went
unanswered, along with other reports of the same bug. Anyway, I just want
to see if someone really is able to use it as a reliable compiler.
Josh
On approximately Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 12:03:51AM +0200, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > > ferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i586 -DMODULE -c -o rd.o rd.c
> > > > rd.c: In function `rd_ioctl':
> > > > rd.c:262: invalid type argument of `->'
> > > > rd.c: In function `rd_cleanup':
> > > > rd.c:375: too few arguments to function `blkdev_put'
> >
> > 2.4.10pre5 doesnt compile for rd. It looks like the same error I got when
> > I applied Al's patch to -ac (and thus took it back out)
>
> Just in case anybody wondered it doesn't compile with gcc-3.0.1 either.
>
> --alessandro
>
> "this is no time to get cute, it's a mad dog's promenade
> so walk tall, or baby don't walk at all"
> (Bruce Springsteen, 'New York City Serenade')
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Linux, the choice | Magic is always the best solution --
of a GNU generation -o) | especially reliable magic.
Kernel 2.4.9-ac1 /\ |
on a i586 _\_v |
|
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.10-pre5
2001-09-09 4:05 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Josh McKinney
@ 2001-09-09 4:14 ` Steven Walter
2001-09-09 11:48 ` 2.4.10-pre5 (and gcc-3) Ken Moffat
2001-09-09 21:22 ` compiling kernel with gcc-3 (was: 2.4.10-pre5) Alessandro Suardi
2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Steven Walter @ 2001-09-09 4:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josh McKinney; +Cc: linux-kernel
I've used it several times. I thought that I experienced a compiler bug
at one point, but then I found that the same behavior occurs with
2.95.3, so...
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 11:05:39PM -0500, Josh McKinney wrote:
> Since I have gotten a decent amount of flame mail from my one-liner posted
> yesterday, I am just curious. Has anyone really been able to successfully
> compile their kernel with gcc-3*. I did once or twice long before it was
> released, but it dies on the same error everytime. I posted it to the
> GCC mailing list because it was an internal compiler error, but it went
> unanswered, along with other reports of the same bug. Anyway, I just want
> to see if someone really is able to use it as a reliable compiler.
>
> Josh
--
-Steven
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
-- George Orwell
Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. War is peace.
-- George Orwell
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.10-pre5/pre6
2001-09-08 10:36 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Peter Osterlund
2001-09-08 12:57 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Garst R. Reese
@ 2001-09-09 5:30 ` Garst R. Reese
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Garst R. Reese @ 2001-09-09 5:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Osterlund; +Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds
aar:/lib/modules/2.4.10-pre6#
Pre5 problems cured but,
dhinds pcmcia-cs-3.1.29 gives:
depmod -ae
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.10-pre6/kernel/drivers/scsi/sd_mod.o
depmod: del_gendisk
depmod: add_gendisk
This patch is still needed for pre6
Peter Osterlund wrote:
> This patch seems to work:
>
> --- linux/drivers/block/rd.c.orig Sat Sep 8 11:58:19 2001
> +++ linux/drivers/block/rd.c Sat Sep 8 12:21:50 2001
> @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@
> /* special: we want to release the ramdisk memory,
> it's not like with the other blockdevices where
> this ioctl only flushes away the buffer cache. */
> - if ((atomic_read(rd_bdev[minor]->bd_openers) > 2))
> + if ((atomic_read(&rd_bdev[minor]->bd_openers) > 2))
> return -EBUSY;
> destroy_buffers(inode->i_rdev);
> rd_blocksizes[minor] = 0;
> @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@
> struct block_device *bdev = rd_bdev[i];
> rd_bdev[i] = NULL;
> if (bdev) {
> - blkdev_put(bdev);
> + blkdev_put(bdev, BDEV_FILE);
> bdput(bdev);
> }
> destroy_buffers(MKDEV(MAJOR_NR, i));
>
> --
> Peter Österlund petero2@telia.com
> Sköndalsvägen 35 http://w1.894.telia.com/~u89404340
> S-128 66 Sköndal +46 8 942647
> Sweden
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.10-pre5 (and gcc-3)
2001-09-09 4:05 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Josh McKinney
2001-09-09 4:14 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Steven Walter
@ 2001-09-09 11:48 ` Ken Moffat
2001-09-09 21:22 ` compiling kernel with gcc-3 (was: 2.4.10-pre5) Alessandro Suardi
2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Ken Moffat @ 2001-09-09 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josh McKinney; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Josh McKinney wrote:
> Since I have gotten a decent amount of flame mail from my one-liner posted
> yesterday, I am just curious. Has anyone really been able to successfully
> compile their kernel with gcc-3*. I did once or twice long before it was
> released, but it dies on the same error everytime.
I had problems with pre-release versions, but gcc-3.0 works fine for
me. I've got two boxes with K6s, this one running 2.4.6 (gcc-3) and the
other was running various fairly recent kernels through to 2.4.8-pre3
compiled with gcc-3. I've seen strange errors with 2.4.7-ac5 (messages about
loss of clock data, and trying to compile gcc-2.95.3 gave sig 11), but I'm
not ready to lay those at the compiler's door. (The test box has turned into
a linux from scratch system using gcc-2.95.3, it will be a little while
before I get gcc-3 back up on it).
Ken
--
If a six turned out to be nine, I don't mind.
Home page : http://www.kenmoffat.uklinux.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: compiling kernel with gcc-3 (was: 2.4.10-pre5)
2001-09-09 4:05 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Josh McKinney
2001-09-09 4:14 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Steven Walter
2001-09-09 11:48 ` 2.4.10-pre5 (and gcc-3) Ken Moffat
@ 2001-09-09 21:22 ` Alessandro Suardi
2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Alessandro Suardi @ 2001-09-09 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josh McKinney; +Cc: linux-kernel
Josh McKinney wrote:
>
> Since I have gotten a decent amount of flame mail from my one-liner posted
> yesterday, I am just curious. Has anyone really been able to successfully
> compile their kernel with gcc-3*. I did once or twice long before it was
> released, but it dies on the same error everytime. I posted it to the
> GCC mailing list because it was an internal compiler error, but it went
> unanswered, along with other reports of the same bug. Anyway, I just want
> to see if someone really is able to use it as a reliable compiler.
>
I've been compiling kernels since June 22 with 3.0, never a
problem. -pre5 and -pre6 compiled with 3.0.1 backing out the
rd.c changes.
--alessandro
"this is no time to get cute, it's a mad dog's promenade
so walk tall, or baby don't walk at all"
(Bruce Springsteen, 'New York City Serenade')
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-09-10 20:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-09-08 5:12 2.4.10-pre5 Garst R. Reese
2001-09-08 6:14 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Kingsley Foreman
2001-09-08 6:46 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Josh McKinney
2001-09-08 8:19 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Nicholas Knight
2001-09-08 9:32 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Eyal Lebedinsky
2001-09-08 13:05 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Alan Cox
2001-09-08 22:03 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Alessandro Suardi
2001-09-09 4:05 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Josh McKinney
2001-09-09 4:14 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Steven Walter
2001-09-09 11:48 ` 2.4.10-pre5 (and gcc-3) Ken Moffat
2001-09-09 21:22 ` compiling kernel with gcc-3 (was: 2.4.10-pre5) Alessandro Suardi
2001-09-08 10:36 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Peter Osterlund
2001-09-08 12:57 ` 2.4.10-pre5 Garst R. Reese
2001-09-09 5:30 ` 2.4.10-pre5/pre6 Garst R. Reese
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).