From: szonyi calin <caszonyi@yahoo.com>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] updated preempt-kernel
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 07:46:01 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011022144601.55173.qmail@web13103.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1003562833.862.65.camel@phantasy>
--- Robert Love <rml@tech9.net> wrote:
> Testers Wanted:
>
> patches to enable a fully preemptible kernel are
> available at:
> http://tech9.net/rml/linux
> for kernels 2.4.10, 2.4.12, 2.4.12-ac3, and
> 2.4.13-pre5.
>
> What is this:
>
> A preemptible kernel. It lowers your latency.
>
Hi
I'm using the preemptible kernel patch since 2.4.10
(no 2.4.11). And it makes a big difference on 486 with
12Megs of ram.
I can't send you benchmarks (i don't have time for
this but if you really want one ... it can be arranged
:-)).
But:
When I run a configure script I can actually see it
running (without this patch it is very slow).
The coolest thing was that I could run Gnome and KDE
(with loadavg of 4 and waiting 2 to 4 minutes for an
application to start (because of ram I think))
something not possible without the preemtible kernel.
I don't swear after them anyway.( I prefer fvwm)
Compilation is much faster (i'll make a benchmark
compiling linux kernel -- i promise :-)) ).
The system is stable with high system loads.
Now is kernel 2.4.12 and no problems at all.
Any chance to be in the main stable kernel ?
Bye
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-22 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-20 7:27 [PATCH] updated preempt-kernel Robert Love
2001-10-20 12:44 ` elko
2001-10-22 20:43 ` elko
2001-10-22 23:11 ` Robert Love
2001-10-23 15:13 ` elko
2001-10-23 15:40 ` Andre's PDC20269 support patch? J.R. de Jong
2001-10-20 12:59 ` [PATCH] updated preempt-kernel Lorenzo Allegrucci
2001-10-20 17:02 ` Robert Love
2001-10-22 15:32 ` bill davidsen
2001-10-22 18:39 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-22 23:08 ` Robert Love
2001-10-21 11:05 ` Colin Phipps
2001-10-21 15:24 ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-21 18:16 ` Robert Love
2001-10-22 15:36 ` Taral
2001-10-21 18:23 ` Federico Sevilla III
2001-10-22 8:27 ` Jesper Juhl
2001-10-22 14:46 ` szonyi calin [this message]
2001-10-22 23:03 ` Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011022144601.55173.qmail@web13103.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=caszonyi@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).