linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: szonyi calin <caszonyi@yahoo.com>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] updated preempt-kernel
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 07:46:01 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011022144601.55173.qmail@web13103.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1003562833.862.65.camel@phantasy>


--- Robert Love <rml@tech9.net> wrote:
> Testers Wanted:
> 
> patches to enable a fully preemptible kernel are
> available at:
> 	http://tech9.net/rml/linux
> for kernels 2.4.10, 2.4.12, 2.4.12-ac3, and
> 2.4.13-pre5.
> 
> What is this:
> 
> A preemptible kernel.  It lowers your latency.
> 

Hi 
I'm using the preemptible kernel patch since 2.4.10 
(no 2.4.11). And it makes a big difference on 486 with
12Megs of ram. 
I can't send you benchmarks (i don't have time for
this but if you really want one ... it can be arranged
:-)). 
But:

When I run a configure script I can actually see it
running (without this patch it is very slow).

The coolest thing was that I could run Gnome and KDE
(with loadavg of 4 and waiting 2 to 4 minutes for an
application to start (because of ram I think))
something not possible without the preemtible kernel.
I don't swear after them anyway.( I prefer fvwm)

Compilation is much faster (i'll make a benchmark
compiling linux kernel -- i promise :-)) ).

The system is stable with high system loads.
Now is kernel 2.4.12 and no problems at all.

Any chance to be in the main stable kernel ?

Bye 



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-10-22 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-20  7:27 [PATCH] updated preempt-kernel Robert Love
2001-10-20 12:44 ` elko
2001-10-22 20:43   ` elko
2001-10-22 23:11   ` Robert Love
2001-10-23 15:13     ` elko
2001-10-23 15:40       ` Andre's PDC20269 support patch? J.R. de Jong
2001-10-20 12:59 ` [PATCH] updated preempt-kernel Lorenzo Allegrucci
2001-10-20 17:02   ` Robert Love
2001-10-22 15:32     ` bill davidsen
2001-10-22 18:39       ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-22 23:08       ` Robert Love
2001-10-21 11:05 ` Colin Phipps
2001-10-21 15:24   ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-21 18:16   ` Robert Love
2001-10-22 15:36     ` Taral
2001-10-21 18:23 ` Federico Sevilla III
2001-10-22  8:27 ` Jesper Juhl
2001-10-22 14:46 ` szonyi calin [this message]
2001-10-22 23:03   ` Robert Love

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011022144601.55173.qmail@web13103.mail.yahoo.com \
    --to=caszonyi@yahoo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).