linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH] extended ptrace
  2002-10-23 15:33 ` Paul Larson
@ 2002-01-16 19:28   ` Pavel Machek
  2002-10-23 16:01   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2002-01-16 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Larson; +Cc: Frank Cornelis, lkml, Frank Cornelis

Hi!

> Do you (or anyone else) have any good tests for this, or even ptrace in
> general?  I'm working on some ptrace tests for LTP, but if someone
> already has something to contribute it would save me some time. :)

You may try to use subterfugue.sf.net to stress ptrace....
				Pavel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] extended ptrace
@ 2002-10-23 15:01 Frank Cornelis
  2002-10-23 15:33 ` Paul Larson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Frank Cornelis @ 2002-10-23 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Frank Cornelis

Hi,

A new extended ptrace patch is available at:
	http://www.elis.rug.ac.be/~fcorneli/downloads/devel/exptrace-0.3.1.patch.gz

This one has the PTRACE_READDATA, PTRACE_WRITEDATA and PTRACE_DUMPCORE 
ptrace requests from SunOS along with faster ptrace_readdata and 
ptrace_writedata functions and some other extended ptrace functionality 
I need. It's patched against 2.4.19.
Since some people often talked about it, I thought some will like this.

Feedback is very welcome. Please CC me.

Frank.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] extended ptrace
  2002-10-23 15:01 [PATCH] extended ptrace Frank Cornelis
@ 2002-10-23 15:33 ` Paul Larson
  2002-01-16 19:28   ` Pavel Machek
  2002-10-23 16:01   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Larson @ 2002-10-23 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Frank Cornelis; +Cc: lkml, Frank Cornelis

On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 10:01, Frank Cornelis wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> A new extended ptrace patch is available at:
> 	http://www.elis.rug.ac.be/~fcorneli/downloads/devel/exptrace-0.3.1.patch.gz
Do you (or anyone else) have any good tests for this, or even ptrace in
general?  I'm working on some ptrace tests for LTP, but if someone
already has something to contribute it would save me some time. :)

Thanks,
Paul Larson


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] extended ptrace
  2002-10-23 16:01   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2002-10-23 16:00     ` Paul Larson
  2002-10-23 18:45       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Larson @ 2002-10-23 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: Frank Cornelis, lkml

On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 11:01, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:33:17AM -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 10:01, Frank Cornelis wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > A new extended ptrace patch is available at:
> > > 	http://www.elis.rug.ac.be/~fcorneli/downloads/devel/exptrace-0.3.1.patch.gz
> > Do you (or anyone else) have any good tests for this, or even ptrace in
> > general?  I'm working on some ptrace tests for LTP, but if someone
> > already has something to contribute it would save me some time. :)
> 
> GDB and gdbserver get a good range of it; just pick a couple of the
> standard tests (to avoid problems with all the GDB bugs the testsuite
> turns up :).  I have some more precise tests but they're for
> features that haven't been accepted yet.
Precise tests that can be automated and ran under our test harness are
more along the lines of what I'm looking for.  If those features do go
in, it might be nice to have them in LTP if you don't mind.

Thanks,
Paul Larson


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] extended ptrace
  2002-10-23 15:33 ` Paul Larson
  2002-01-16 19:28   ` Pavel Machek
@ 2002-10-23 16:01   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  2002-10-23 16:00     ` Paul Larson
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-10-23 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Larson; +Cc: Frank Cornelis, lkml

On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:33:17AM -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 10:01, Frank Cornelis wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > A new extended ptrace patch is available at:
> > 	http://www.elis.rug.ac.be/~fcorneli/downloads/devel/exptrace-0.3.1.patch.gz
> Do you (or anyone else) have any good tests for this, or even ptrace in
> general?  I'm working on some ptrace tests for LTP, but if someone
> already has something to contribute it would save me some time. :)

GDB and gdbserver get a good range of it; just pick a couple of the
standard tests (to avoid problems with all the GDB bugs the testsuite
turns up :).  I have some more precise tests but they're for
features that haven't been accepted yet.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] extended ptrace
  2002-10-23 16:00     ` Paul Larson
@ 2002-10-23 18:45       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-10-23 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Larson; +Cc: Frank Cornelis, lkml

On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:00:13AM -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 11:01, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:33:17AM -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 10:01, Frank Cornelis wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > A new extended ptrace patch is available at:
> > > > 	http://www.elis.rug.ac.be/~fcorneli/downloads/devel/exptrace-0.3.1.patch.gz
> > > Do you (or anyone else) have any good tests for this, or even ptrace in
> > > general?  I'm working on some ptrace tests for LTP, but if someone
> > > already has something to contribute it would save me some time. :)
> > 
> > GDB and gdbserver get a good range of it; just pick a couple of the
> > standard tests (to avoid problems with all the GDB bugs the testsuite
> > turns up :).  I have some more precise tests but they're for
> > features that haven't been accepted yet.
> Precise tests that can be automated and ran under our test harness are
> more along the lines of what I'm looking for.  If those features do go
> in, it might be nice to have them in LTP if you don't mind.

No, I mean from GDB's automated regression suite.  Build gdb from
source and 'make check' to see it.  There's a lot of tests which fail
for reasons you aren't interested in, but a lot of them could just be
incorporated.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-08 21:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-23 15:01 [PATCH] extended ptrace Frank Cornelis
2002-10-23 15:33 ` Paul Larson
2002-01-16 19:28   ` Pavel Machek
2002-10-23 16:01   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-23 16:00     ` Paul Larson
2002-10-23 18:45       ` Daniel Jacobowitz

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).