From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: lord@sgi.com, Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
cw@f00f.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 19:45:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020930194529.A15138@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209301835190.18614-100000@localhost.localdomain>; from mingo@elte.hu on Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:38:03PM +0200
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:38:03PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> see the workqueues patch i posted a couple of minutes ago. Does this solve
> XFS's problems?
Not exactly. All your work on one queue is internally serialize. An
totally unserialized workqueue would be best for XFS.
> why is it ugly? I can add a simple interface to the workqueues subsystem
> that will bind the XFS worker threads to given sets of CPUs. That should
> give you per-CPU workqueues, with separate per-CPU locking.
That would also work, but would require more code in XFS than my
above suggestion.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-30 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-29 17:52 [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39 Ingo Molnar
2002-09-29 18:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-29 18:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-29 19:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-29 19:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-29 18:54 ` Dave Jones
2002-09-29 19:15 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-30 0:20 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-30 4:33 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-30 4:28 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-30 4:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-09-30 12:55 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-30 14:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-09-29 19:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-30 0:39 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-30 6:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-30 21:45 ` george anzinger
2002-10-01 3:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-01 4:18 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-01 5:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-01 8:00 ` george anzinger
2002-10-01 5:33 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-10-03 7:10 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-30 23:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-09-30 16:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-30 23:45 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2002-09-30 17:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-01 0:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020930194529.A15138@sgi.com \
--to=hch@sgi.com \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lord@sgi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).