From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>, Rob Radez <rob@osinvestor.com>
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Watchdog drivers
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 20:01:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021013200104.C23142@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021013194041.A15609@medelec.uia.ac.be>; from wim@iguana.be on Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 07:40:41PM +0200
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 07:40:41PM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> I'm reviewing the different watchdog drivers and started porting the features
> that have been added in the 2.4 kernel to the 2.5 development kernel.
> I now wondered if it would make sence to put all watchdog drivers in
> drivers/char/watchdog/ instead of in drivers/char ?
> Please comments.
Rob Radez has been doing a lot of work in this area; I thought he
was going to do the 2.5 drivers as well (or his last mail on the
8 August seemed to imply that.) Not sure what happened.
Rob?
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-13 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-13 17:40 Watchdog drivers Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-13 19:01 ` Russell King [this message]
2002-10-13 22:31 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-13 22:43 ` Russell King
2002-10-13 23:17 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-14 1:57 ` Rob Radez
2002-10-14 8:12 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-14 12:22 ` Dave Jones
2002-10-14 12:41 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-14 13:04 ` Dave Jones
2002-10-14 15:11 ` Rob Radez
2002-10-14 15:58 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-15 9:35 ` David Woodhouse
2002-10-15 11:20 ` Dave Jones
2002-10-14 9:29 ` Padraig Brady
2002-10-14 15:51 Matt_Domsch
2002-10-14 16:40 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-14 19:12 ` Matt Domsch
2002-10-15 9:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-10-15 17:26 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-16 21:36 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-11-06 13:10 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-15 12:57 Matt_Domsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021013200104.C23142@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob@osinvestor.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).