From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>, Rob Radez <rob@osinvestor.com>,
<torvalds@transmeta.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Watchdog drivers
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 15:31:12 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0210131529140.22520-100000@dragon.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021013200104.C23142@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Russell King wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 07:40:41PM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
| > I'm reviewing the different watchdog drivers and started porting the features
| > that have been added in the 2.4 kernel to the 2.5 development kernel.
| > I now wondered if it would make sence to put all watchdog drivers in
| > drivers/char/watchdog/ instead of in drivers/char ?
| > Please comments.
|
| Rob Radez has been doing a lot of work in this area; I thought he
| was going to do the 2.5 drivers as well (or his last mail on the
| 8 August seemed to imply that.) Not sure what happened.
|
| Rob?
Rob has gone off to school and apparently has little time
for such trivial stuff. :)
His (2.4.19-preN) patches used to live at http://junker.org/~rradez/wd/
but I can't get to that web server now.
I do have a copy of the patch file that was there if Wim
or anyone needs/wants it.
--
~Randy
"In general, avoiding problems is better than solving them."
-- from "#ifdef Considered Harmful", Spencer & Collyer, USENIX 1992.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-13 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-13 17:40 Watchdog drivers Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-13 19:01 ` Russell King
2002-10-13 22:31 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2002-10-13 22:43 ` Russell King
2002-10-13 23:17 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-14 1:57 ` Rob Radez
2002-10-14 8:12 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-14 12:22 ` Dave Jones
2002-10-14 12:41 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-14 13:04 ` Dave Jones
2002-10-14 15:11 ` Rob Radez
2002-10-14 15:58 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-15 9:35 ` David Woodhouse
2002-10-15 11:20 ` Dave Jones
2002-10-14 9:29 ` Padraig Brady
2002-10-14 15:51 Matt_Domsch
2002-10-14 16:40 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-14 19:12 ` Matt Domsch
2002-10-15 9:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-10-15 17:26 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-16 21:36 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-11-06 13:10 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-15 12:57 Matt_Domsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0210131529140.22520-100000@dragon.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rob@osinvestor.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).