From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.64-mm1 with contest
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:24:55 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200303070724.55565.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
contest results:
no_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 4 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.63-mm2 3 80 92.5 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.64 3 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.64-mm1 5 81 91.4 0.0 0.0 1.00
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 4 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.5.63-mm2 3 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.94
2.5.64 3 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.95
2.5.64-mm1 5 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.93
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 4 92 81.5 28.2 15.2 1.16
2.5.63-mm2 3 92 80.4 29.3 16.3 1.15
2.5.64 3 92 81.5 30.0 16.3 1.16
2.5.64-mm1 5 94 78.7 30.2 18.1 1.16
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 3 99 79.8 1.0 4.0 1.25
2.5.63-mm2 3 112 70.5 1.0 6.2 1.40
2.5.64 3 100 79.0 0.0 0.0 1.27
2.5.64-mm1 5 114 69.3 0.8 4.4 1.41
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 3 102 74.5 1.0 3.9 1.29
2.5.63-mm2 3 108 70.4 1.0 4.6 1.35
2.5.64 3 103 73.8 1.0 3.9 1.30
2.5.64-mm1 5 112 67.9 1.0 4.5 1.38
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 5 217 35.0 56.7 15.1 2.75
2.5.63-mm2 3 99 75.8 15.1 7.1 1.24
2.5.64 3 229 33.2 58.8 14.8 2.90
2.5.64-mm1 5 97 77.3 13.6 6.2 1.20
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 4 95 78.9 15.3 8.3 1.20
2.5.63-mm2 3 92 80.4 13.2 6.5 1.15
2.5.64 3 100 75.0 18.4 9.0 1.27
2.5.64-mm1 5 93 80.6 13.7 7.5 1.15
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 3 106 74.5 5.7 4.7 1.34
2.5.63-mm2 3 121 64.5 8.4 5.8 1.51
2.5.64 3 103 76.7 6.2 4.9 1.30
2.5.64-mm1 5 115 68.7 8.2 6.1 1.42
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 3 96 79.2 0.0 6.2 1.22
2.5.63-mm2 3 99 76.8 0.0 6.1 1.24
2.5.64 3 96 79.2 0.0 6.2 1.22
2.5.64-mm1 5 100 76.0 0.0 7.0 1.23
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 3 104 75.0 57.7 1.9 1.32
2.5.63-mm2 3 132 59.1 90.3 2.3 1.65
2.5.64 3 105 74.3 58.3 1.9 1.33
2.5.64-mm1 5 111 70.3 63.2 1.8 1.37
dbench_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.63 4 194 39.2 2.0 38.7 2.46
2.5.63-mm2 3 236 32.2 2.7 43.2 2.95
2.5.64 3 222 34.2 2.3 38.7 2.81
2.5.64-mm1 5 231 32.9 2.6 42.0 2.85
Compared with 2.5.63-mm2 hardly any difference. Slightly better read load,
slightly longer tar loads; the climbing mem_load problem has gone away...?
Con
reply other threads:[~2003-03-06 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200303070724.55565.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).