* Re: Question regarding Intel i845 chipset.
@ 2003-04-11 17:03 war
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: war @ 2003-04-11 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: freesoftwaredeveloper, war; +Cc: linux-kernel
Ok, then it isn't that, on my SiS, using IO-APIC causes all the interrupts to use 18, and nothing works, remote kernel upgrades a \bre a pain, thanks, now I know it is not this.\b, which is causing the problem.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Question regarding Intel i845 chipset.
@ 2003-04-28 20:05 Chris Smith
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Smith @ 2003-04-28 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:30:20 +0200, Alan Cox wrote:
> No.
>
> Not all BIOS vendors get the tables right however.
Recently compiled 2.4.21-rc1 on two systems with Intel boards, one an
i850 based board where there were no problems with the APIC being
enabled (as it was also with an earlier kernel) but an i845 based board
(Intel D845PT, latest BIOS) would not enable the APIC (all XT-PIC in
/proc/interrupts) until I applied the -ac3 patch, even though the APIC
has worked fine under that other OS.
Chris Smith
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Question regarding Intel i845 chipset.
2003-04-11 16:04 war
2003-04-11 16:24 ` Alan Cox
@ 2003-04-11 16:35 ` Michael Buesch
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Buesch @ 2003-04-11 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: war; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Friday 11 April 2003 18:04, war@lucidpixels.com wrote:
> Is IO-APIC broken on the Intel 845 chipset?
I'm running it without problems.
Regards
Michael Buesch.
--
My homepage: http://www.8ung.at/tuxsoft
fighting for peace is like fu**ing for virginity
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Question regarding Intel i845 chipset.
2003-04-11 16:04 war
@ 2003-04-11 16:24 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-11 16:35 ` Michael Buesch
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2003-04-11 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: war; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Gwe, 2003-04-11 at 17:04, war@lucidpixels.com wrote:
> Is IO-APIC broken on the Intel 845 chipset?
No.
Not all BIOS vendors get the tables right however.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Question regarding Intel i845 chipset.
@ 2003-04-11 16:04 war
2003-04-11 16:24 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-11 16:35 ` Michael Buesch
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: war @ 2003-04-11 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Is IO-APIC broken on the Intel 845 chipset?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-28 19:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-11 17:03 Question regarding Intel i845 chipset war
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-28 20:05 Chris Smith
2003-04-11 16:04 war
2003-04-11 16:24 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-11 16:35 ` Michael Buesch
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).