linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: hch@infradead.org
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, thomas@horsten.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.21-rc1: byteorder.h breaks with __STRICT_ANSI__ defined (trivial)
Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 22:07:14 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030506.220714.35679546.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030507062613.A5318@infradead.org>

   From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
   Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 06:26:13 +0100
   
   Look at e.g. the debian and redhat packages of ipsec-tools:  they all
   have their local copy of theses headers.
   
You merely support my point, the situation is rediculious.

Why don't we copy headers into every app package that wants to use
certain interfaces?

#ifdef SARCASM
Yeah, that sounds like an excellent idea.
#endif /* SARCASM */

This doesn't even consider the case where the ipsec-tools copy of the
headers becomes out of date with the kernel copy.  This isn't a
theoretical issue, this problem is real.

For example, I just changed the values of a few SADB_EALG_* values in
pfkeyv2.h.  Now ipsec-tools is effectively broken.  Oops, when will
the copy in ipsec-tools get updated?

What about applications, ie. normal ones, that want to pass IPSEC
policies into the kernel via the socket options we have that allows
per-socket IPSEC rules to be specified?  The copy in ipsec-tools
doesn't help them at all.

All of this is madness, and every suggestion to copy the headers
all over the place is a non-solution.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-07  6:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-06  9:16 [PATCH] 2.4.21-rc1: byteorder.h breaks with __STRICT_ANSI__ defined (trivial) Thomas Horsten
2003-05-06  9:19 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-06  9:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-06  9:47   ` Thomas Horsten
2003-05-06  9:49     ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-06 10:03       ` David S. Miller
2003-05-06 14:10         ` Thomas Horsten
2003-05-06 13:06           ` David S. Miller
2003-05-06 15:40             ` Thomas Horsten
2003-05-07  5:50               ` ismail (cartman) donmez
2003-05-07  6:44                 ` Thomas Horsten
2003-05-07  6:45                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-07  5:44                     ` David S. Miller
2003-05-07  6:55                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-07  6:59                     ` Thomas Horsten
2003-05-07  5:53                       ` David S. Miller
2003-05-06 21:19           ` David Woodhouse
2003-05-07  3:06             ` David S. Miller
2003-05-07  5:26               ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-07  5:07                 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-05-07  6:20                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-07  5:19                     ` David S. Miller
2003-05-07  6:28                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-07  5:27                         ` David S. Miller
2003-05-07  6:41                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-07  5:42                             ` David S. Miller
     [not found] <20030506110259.A29633@infradead.org>
2003-05-06 10:24 ` Thomas Horsten
2003-11-06 17:36 Martin Schlemmer
2003-11-06 17:37 ` David S. Miller
2003-11-06 18:32   ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-11-06 18:42     ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-11-06 19:37       ` David S. Miller
2003-11-06 20:09         ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-11-06 20:05           ` David S. Miller
2003-11-06 20:29             ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-11-06 20:27               ` David S. Miller
2003-11-06 21:18                 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-11-06 21:18                   ` David S. Miller
2003-11-06 21:59                     ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-11-06 21:24                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-06 20:40               ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-11-06 22:31                 ` David S. Miller
2003-11-06 23:40                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-11-06 21:21             ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030506.220714.35679546.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas@horsten.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).