linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: azarah@gentoo.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.21-rc1: byteorder.h breaks with __STRICT_ANSI__ defined (trivial)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 12:05:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031106120548.097ccc7c.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1068149368.12287.331.camel@nosferatu.lan>

On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 22:09:29 +0200
Martin Schlemmer <azarah@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 21:37, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Let's say that you end up using some inline function
> > that takes u32 arguments, and internally it uses
> > u64 types to speed up the calculation or make it more
> > accurate or something like that.
> 
> So basically only in cases where the stuff in byteorder.h
> was not inlined ... ?

No, exactly in the cases where it _IS_ inlined.  Imagine
this:

static inline u32 swab_foo(u32 a, u32 b)
{
	u64 tmp = ((u64)a<<32) | ((u64)b);
	u32 retval;

	retval = compute(tmp);

	return retval;
}

If that's in a kernel header somewhere, and you build with -ansi,
you lose.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-06 20:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-06 17:36 [PATCH] 2.4.21-rc1: byteorder.h breaks with __STRICT_ANSI__ defined (trivial) Martin Schlemmer
2003-11-06 17:37 ` David S. Miller
2003-11-06 18:32   ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-11-06 18:42     ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-11-06 19:37       ` David S. Miller
2003-11-06 20:09         ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-11-06 20:05           ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-11-06 20:29             ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-11-06 20:27               ` David S. Miller
2003-11-06 21:18                 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-11-06 21:18                   ` David S. Miller
2003-11-06 21:59                     ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-11-06 21:24                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-06 20:40               ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-11-06 22:31                 ` David S. Miller
2003-11-06 23:40                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-11-06 21:21             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
     [not found]   ` <1068489427.7910.147.camel@nosferatu.lan>
     [not found]     ` <3FAFE1E2.2020000@zytor.com>
     [not found]       ` <1068589739.19849.2.camel@nosferatu.lan>
     [not found]         ` <20031111145805.45206335.davem@redhat.com>
2003-11-15 13:09           ` [PATCH 2.4] " Martin Schlemmer
2003-11-15 13:24           ` [PATCH 2.6] " Martin Schlemmer
     [not found] <20030506110259.A29633@infradead.org>
2003-05-06 10:24 ` [PATCH] 2.4.21-rc1: " Thomas Horsten
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-06  9:16 Thomas Horsten
2003-05-06  9:19 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-06  9:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-06  9:47   ` Thomas Horsten
2003-05-06  9:49     ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-06 10:03       ` David S. Miller
2003-05-06 14:10         ` Thomas Horsten
2003-05-06 13:06           ` David S. Miller
2003-05-06 15:40             ` Thomas Horsten
2003-05-07  5:50               ` ismail (cartman) donmez
2003-05-07  6:44                 ` Thomas Horsten
2003-05-07  6:45                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-07  5:44                     ` David S. Miller
2003-05-07  6:55                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-07  6:59                     ` Thomas Horsten
2003-05-07  5:53                       ` David S. Miller
2003-05-06 21:19           ` David Woodhouse
2003-05-07  3:06             ` David S. Miller
2003-05-07  5:26               ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-07  5:07                 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-07  6:20                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-07  5:19                     ` David S. Miller
2003-05-07  6:28                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-07  5:27                         ` David S. Miller
2003-05-07  6:41                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-07  5:42                             ` David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031106120548.097ccc7c.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=azarah@gentoo.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).