From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: davem@redhat.com, willy@debian.org,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Message Signalled Interrupt support?
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 13:26:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200305121330_MC3-1-3881-E571@compuserve.com> (raw)
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Has anybody done any work, or put any thought, into MSI support?
>
> Would things massively break if I set up MSI manually in the driver?
>
> I heard rumblings on lkml that Intel has done some work internally w/
> MSI support in Linux, but that doesn't help me much without further
> details ;-)
I found this in my archives:
================================
Subject: RE: [PATCH] 2.5.68 Fix IO_APIC IRQ assignment bug
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:34:34 -0700
From: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
<SNIP>
After (vector-based)
CPU0 CPU1
0: 709682 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
2: 0 0 XT-PIC cascade
9: 0 0 IO-APIC-level acpi
14: 4988 1 IO-APIC-edge ide0
15: 10 1 IO-APIC-edge ide1
177: 78 0 IO-APIC-level uhci-hcd
185: 0 0 IO-APIC-level uhci-hcd, uhci-hcd
193: 58 0 IO-APIC-level uhci-hcd
201: 0 0 IO-APIC-level ehci-hcd
209: 356 0 IO-APIC-level eth0
NMI: 0 0
LOC: 707613 707524
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
=========================================
They changed things so the MSI scheme uses the vector number
directly instead of remapping it...
next reply other threads:[~2003-05-12 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-12 17:26 Chuck Ebbert [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-12 18:26 Message Signalled Interrupt support? Nakajima, Jun
2003-05-12 17:53 Nakajima, Jun
2003-05-12 16:32 Jeff Garzik
2003-05-12 16:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-05-12 17:20 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-12 18:54 ` Mika Penttilä
2003-05-12 17:43 ` Matt Porter
2003-05-12 18:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-05-12 18:48 ` Matt Porter
2003-05-13 11:21 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200305121330_MC3-1-3881-E571@compuserve.com \
--to=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).