linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
To: Alexander Hoogerhuis <alexh@ihatent.com>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: USB 2.0 with 250Gb disk and insane loads
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 20:21:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200306012021.41147.oliver@neukum.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k7c5g738.fsf@lapper.ihatent.com>


> > Probably the block layer as it waits for free io slots.
> > But that doesn't tell us why the requests are not executed.
> > Where is SCSI timeout kicking in?
>
> I'm not seeing any scsi timeouts in the logs.

So it seems that the driver doesn't fail utterly, but crawls along.
Storage's debugging output should clarify the situation.

[..]
> > Could you try on USB1.1 only?
>
> Stuck it in an older machine on USB 1.1 and it foudn the disk fine
> (redhat 9, 2.4.20-13.9 kernel on that machine), and ditto result:
>
> 19:15:16  up 2 days, 20:23,  4 users,  load average: 6.02, 2.41, 0.89
> 58 processes: 55 sleeping, 3 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
> CPU states:   0.2% user   4.0% system   0.0% nice   0.0% iowait  95.8% idle
> Mem:   385040k av,  380820k used,    4220k free,       0k shrd,   67368k
> buff 224720k active,              69412k inactive
> Swap:  521632k av,      80k used,  521552k free                  237452k
> cached
>
> and generating about 2500 interrupts for the usb controller per 10
> seconds and when i finally break it off and give it "sync" it uses
> about two minutes with about 4500 per 10 seconds to get it all on
> disk. On 2.4 the machine becomes more and more sluggish if I let it go
> more than a short minute.

Which 2.4 ?

	Regards
		Oliver


  reply	other threads:[~2003-06-01 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-01 14:31 USB 2.0 with 250Gb disk and insane loads David Brownell
2003-06-01 14:53 ` Oliver Neukum
2003-06-01 15:17   ` Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-06-01 18:21     ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2003-06-02  6:51       ` Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-06-02 14:03       ` Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-06-02 17:13         ` David Brownell
2003-06-02 17:17           ` Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-06-03 11:49     ` Terje Malmedal
2003-06-01 14:57 ` Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-06-13 20:19 ` David Brownell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-01 13:47 Alexander Hoogerhuis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200306012021.41147.oliver@neukum.org \
    --to=oliver@neukum.org \
    --cc=alexh@ihatent.com \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).