linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Hoogerhuis <alexh@ihatent.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: USB 2.0 with 250Gb disk and insane loads
Date: 02 Jun 2003 16:03:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87llwkpoex.fsf@lapper.ihatent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200306012021.41147.oliver@neukum.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org> writes:

> > > Probably the block layer as it waits for free io slots.
> > > But that doesn't tell us why the requests are not executed.
> > > Where is SCSI timeout kicking in?
> >
> > I'm not seeing any scsi timeouts in the logs.
> 
> So it seems that the driver doesn't fail utterly, but crawls along.
> Storage's debugging output should clarify the situation.
> 

I had a private reply form a guy that had three of these running
reliably on 2.4.21-pre6, and he noted he'd never done cd->disk
transfers, but across the net. So I did the same.

Results are that it survived a lot longer, I managed to get about
700Mb across at about 8Mb/s (line speed 100mbit half duplex) before it
fell over with this:

usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 13/13
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk status result = 0
usb-storage: Bulk status Sig 0x53425355 T 0xc42 R 0 Stat 0x0
usb-storage: scsi cmd done, result=0x0
usb-storage: *** thread sleeping.
usb-storage: queuecommand() called
usb-storage: *** thread awakened.
usb-storage: Command WRITE_10 (10 bytes)
usb-storage:  2a 00 18 f0 34 47 00 04 00 00
usb-storage: Bulk command S 0x43425355 T 0xc43 Trg 0 LUN 0 L 524288 F 0 CL 10
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 31 bytes
usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 31/31
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk command transfer result=0
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_sglist: xfer 524288 bytes, 128 entries
usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 524288/524288
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk data transfer result 0x0
usb-storage: Attempting to get CSW...
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 13 bytes
usb-storage: usb_storage_command_abort called
usb-storage: usb_stor_stop_transport called
usb-storage: -- cancelling URB
usb-storage: Status code -104; transferred 0/13
usb-storage: -- transfer cancelled
usb-storage: Bulk status result = 3
usb-storage: -- command was aborted
usb-storage: Bulk reset requested
usb-storage: Soft reset: clearing bulk-in endpoint halt
usb-storage: Soft reset: clearing bulk-out endpoint halt
usb-storage: Soft reset done
usb-storage: scsi command aborted
usb-storage: *** thread sleeping.
usb-storage: queuecommand() called
usb-storage: *** thread awakened.
usb-storage: Command TEST_UNIT_READY (6 bytes)
usb-storage:  00 00 00 00 00 00
usb-storage: Bulk command S 0x43425355 T 0xc43 Trg 0 LUN 0 L 0 F 0 CL 6
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 31 bytes
usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 31/31
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk command transfer result=0
usb-storage: Attempting to get CSW...
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 13 bytes
usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 13/13
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk status result = 0
usb-storage: Bulk status Sig 0x53425355 T 0xc43 R 0 Stat 0x0
usb-storage: scsi cmd done, result=0x0
usb-storage: *** thread sleeping.

Load only got up to about 3-4 before it fell over.

Apart from that, it seems the speed at which it falls over is depening
on two factors: with/without debugging and speed at which data arrives
for the drive.

Using a ssh-session that limited it to 3Mb/sec and it ran fine for a
long time with interrupts showing at about 5000 a second for the
usb-controller (vs. 1000 for the timer). With the example above that
made it fall over it ran at close to 10k interrupts/sec.

If it makes a difference, transferring from a local CD-ROM to the
drive across USB 2.0 also uses ide-scsi. The 2.4 example I had falling
over used no ide-scsi.

mvh,
A
- -- 
Alexander Hoogerhuis                               | alexh@ihatent.com
CCNP - CCDP - MCNE - CCSE                          | +47 908 21 485
"You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it."  --Scott McNealy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE+21kjCQ1pa+gRoggRAiV4AJ9OAqrgeSP5WzwkonApbZtNPDOd1QCfTz68
81LU78RHkdpIlLNPD6Bgr6g=
=4Lmd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-06-02 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-01 14:31 USB 2.0 with 250Gb disk and insane loads David Brownell
2003-06-01 14:53 ` Oliver Neukum
2003-06-01 15:17   ` Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-06-01 18:21     ` Oliver Neukum
2003-06-02  6:51       ` Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-06-02 14:03       ` Alexander Hoogerhuis [this message]
2003-06-02 17:13         ` David Brownell
2003-06-02 17:17           ` Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-06-03 11:49     ` Terje Malmedal
2003-06-01 14:57 ` Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-06-13 20:19 ` David Brownell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-01 13:47 Alexander Hoogerhuis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87llwkpoex.fsf@lapper.ihatent.com \
    --to=alexh@ihatent.com \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver@neukum.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).