[clemens@endorphin.org: Please confirm your message/Bitte bestaetige Deine Nachricht]

[clemens@endorphin.org: Please confirm your message/Bitte bestaetige Deine Nachricht]

[Christoph Hellwig]

Okay, for everyone who want to answer to the loop thread just drop
clemens@endorphin.org from the Cc list - just another idiots that wants
mails confirmed..


----- Forwarded message from clemens@endorphin.org -----

Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 15:57:14 GMT
From: clemens@endorphin.org
Subject: Please confirm your message/Bitte bestaetige Deine Nachricht
To: hch@infradead.org

Die  Zustellung  Deiner  Nachricht  |  Your e-mail message  with the subject
mit   dem   Subjekt  "Re: [PATCH - RFC] loop.c"  |  of  "Re: [PATCH - RFC] loop.c"   is   being   held
ist   unterbrochen,   weil   Deine  |  because   your   address    was   not
Mailadresse      unbekannt     ist  |  recognized  (or the -dated cookie  is
(oder die Zeitmarke abgelaufen).    |  expired).

Eine  Bestaetigung  ist notwendig,  |  A  confirmation  is  required   which
womit  du  garantierst, dass Deine  |  guarantees   that  your  message   is
Nachricht    legitim   und   keine  |  legitimate and not junk-mail.
unerwuenschte Massennachricht ist.  |

Um   Deine   Nachricht   fuer  die  |  To release your message for delivery,
Zustellung freizugeben, sende eine  |  please  send an empty message  to the
leere  Nachricht  an  die folgende  |  following   address,  or   use   your
Adresse,    oder    benuetze   die  |  mailer's "Reply" feature:
Antwortfunktion             Deines  |
Mailprogramms:                      |

   clemens-confirm-accept.1056211034.1633.88a6@endorphin.org

     ACHTUNG: DEINE NACHRICHT       |       WARNING: YOUR MESSAGE WILL
     WIRD UNGELESEN GELOESCHT,      |         BE DELETED UNNOTICED,
     WENN DU NICHT ANTWORTEST.      |         IF YOU DO NOT REPLY.

[ This notice was generated by TMDA v0.51 (http://tmda.sf.net/),
  an automated junk-mail reduction system. ]

--- Enclosed is a copy of your message.

>From hch@infradead.org Sat Jun 21 15:57:14 2003
Return-Path: <hch@infradead.org>
Delivered-To: therapy@leto2.endorphin.org
Received: (qmail 1628 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2003 15:57:13 -0000
Received: from static213-229-22-161.adsl.inode.at (HELO homebase.endorphin.org) (213.229.22.161)
  by chello080108023209.34.11.vie.surfer.at with SMTP; 21 Jun 2003 15:57:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 5281 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2003 16:53:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 5273 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2003 16:53:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO phoenix.infradead.org) (195.224.96.167)
  by static213-229-22-161.adsl.inode.at with SMTP; 21 Jun 2003 16:53:09 -0000
Received: from hch by phoenix.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 19TkjH-00073k-00; Sat, 21 Jun 2003 16:56:39 +0100
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 16:56:39 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
Cc: akpm@digeo.com, axboe@suse.de, clemens@endorphin.org,
  torvalds@transmeta.com, jari.ruusu@pp.inet.fi, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
  hugh@veritas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH - RFC] loop.c
Message-ID: <20030621165639.A27091@infradead.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, akpm@digeo.com, axboe@suse.de,
	clemens@endorphin.org, torvalds@transmeta.com,
	jari.ruusu@pp.inet.fi, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	hugh@veritas.com
References: <UTC200306211507.h5LF7lM23701.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <UTC200306211507.h5LF7lM23701.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl>; from Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl on Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 05:07:47PM +0200

On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 05:07:47PM +0200, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
> Concerning the second point, several patches are floating around.
> Below a patch that Jari Ruusu sent me.
> 
> This is a RFC.
> Clemens - any comments on the crypto side?
> Jens - any comments on the block I/O side?

The patch is far too big and mixes up very different issues.  Let's
change one thing at a time.  There's was a small patch for the IV
issue posted, let's get that in first and base small, reviewable patches
on it.  You also might want to Cc'ed Hugh as he did some work on
loop.c recently..


----- End forwarded message -----