linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sizeof (siginfo_t) problem
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:55:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030714135540.GB26002@mail.jlokier.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030714084000.J15481@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> When siginfo_t was added, the intent obviously was that its size
> be 128 bytes on all arches.
> 
> The kernel unfortunately does this right on sparc64 and alpha from 64-bit
> arches only; ia64, s390x, ppc64 etc. got it wrong.

That's not the only siginfo_t problem:

	- Take a look at the placement of the _uid32 field on m68k.
	  It varies from sub-structure to sub-structure - yet it is
	  always written to the same offset by the kernel.  Borken!

Other cleanups:

	- SI_* codes on S390 are identical to the generic ones.
	  They can be removed from the S390 file.

	- Comment in MIPS siginfo about IRIX compatibility is no
	  longer true; the layout was changed when uid32 added.

	- __ARCH_SI_UID_T can be removed.  Only Sparc sets it,
	  and to the same type as uid_t (unsigned int).

-- Jamie

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-14 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-14 12:40 sizeof (siginfo_t) problem Jakub Jelinek
2003-07-14 13:55 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2003-07-14 15:02   ` Andreas Schwab
2003-07-14 15:48 ` David Mosberger
2003-07-14 15:57   ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-07-14 16:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2003-07-14 17:00   ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-07-14 17:11     ` Stephen Rothwell
2003-07-14 17:14       ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-07-14 17:25         ` Stephen Rothwell
2003-07-14 17:45           ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-07-19 18:32   ` Anton Blanchard
2003-07-21  0:08     ` Stephen Rothwell
2003-07-22 13:42       ` Russell King
2003-07-22 13:57         ` Stephen Rothwell
2003-07-14 18:31 Ulrich Weigand
2003-07-14 18:35 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-07-14 18:52 Ulrich Weigand
2003-07-15 11:58 Martin Schwidefsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030714135540.GB26002@mail.jlokier.co.uk \
    --to=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).