linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich Weigand" <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>
To: jakub@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sizeof (siginfo_t) problem
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 20:31:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <OF8354A4F2.09CC83D0-ONC1256D63.0064A671@de.ibm.com> (raw)

Jakub Jelinek wrote:

>I have noticed this on s390x in a different place:
>MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR in gcc, in order to unwind through
>signal frames, needs to locate ucontext, and looking at
>stack pointer + 8 + sizeof(siginfo_t) (which works on s390 32-bit)
>did not work at all, everything was shifted by 8 bytes.

The MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR macro does not use sizeof(siginfo_t)
at all, but hardcodes 128.  (This has always been the case, and was
done to avoid the need to include signal.h.)  This is still broken
with the current kernel behaviour, though.

It is strange that I didn't notice the problem earlier; apparently
most of the places where unwinding through signal frames is required
use non-RT frames ...

>This though means that the kernel siginfo_t change cannot be done
>just in asm-*/siginfo.h headers - at least places where siginfo_t
>is present within some structures ever visible to userland a dummy
>8 byte pad needs to be inserted.

As userspace expects a size of 128 bytes, and with the change
the size now *is* 128 bytes, why would a pad be required?


Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards

Ulrich Weigand

--
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  Linux for S/390 Design & Development
  IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH, Schoenaicher Str. 220, 71032 Boeblingen
  Phone: +49-7031/16-3727   ---   Email: Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


             reply	other threads:[~2003-07-14 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-14 18:31 Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2003-07-14 18:35 ` sizeof (siginfo_t) problem Jakub Jelinek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-15 11:58 Martin Schwidefsky
2003-07-14 18:52 Ulrich Weigand
2003-07-14 12:40 Jakub Jelinek
2003-07-14 13:55 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-14 15:02   ` Andreas Schwab
2003-07-14 15:48 ` David Mosberger
2003-07-14 15:57   ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-07-14 16:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2003-07-14 17:00   ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-07-14 17:11     ` Stephen Rothwell
2003-07-14 17:14       ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-07-14 17:25         ` Stephen Rothwell
2003-07-14 17:45           ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-07-19 18:32   ` Anton Blanchard
2003-07-21  0:08     ` Stephen Rothwell
2003-07-22 13:42       ` Russell King
2003-07-22 13:57         ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=OF8354A4F2.09CC83D0-ONC1256D63.0064A671@de.ibm.com \
    --to=ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).