From: Erich Focht <efocht@hpce.nec.com>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LSE <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [patch] scheduler fix for 1cpu/node case
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 18:30:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200308011830.07280.efocht@hpce.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <380280000.1059697615@flay>
On Friday 01 August 2003 02:26, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> np - was easy to fix up ;-) I did run some benchmarks on it ...
> low end SDET seemed highly variable, but otherwise looked OK.
> If I have only 4 tasks running on a 16x (4x4), what's the rate
> limit on the idle cpus trying to steal now?
the rate is 3ms, that's a bit too fast, maybe. And the busy rate is
200ms (instead of 400). I made some experiments with 2 CPUs per node
and 1 ms seems to be definitely too fast. I'll tune the formula a
bit...
Regards,
Erich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-01 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-28 19:16 [patch] scheduler fix for 1cpu/node case Erich Focht
2003-07-28 19:55 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-28 20:18 ` Erich Focht
2003-07-28 20:37 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-29 2:24 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-07-29 10:08 ` Erich Focht
2003-07-29 13:33 ` [Lse-tech] " Andrew Theurer
2003-07-30 15:23 ` Erich Focht
2003-07-30 15:44 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-07-29 14:27 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-13 20:49 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-22 15:46 ` [Lse-tech] " Andrew Theurer
2003-08-22 22:56 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-23 0:12 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-08-23 0:29 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-23 0:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-23 8:48 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-23 14:32 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-08-23 1:31 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-29 10:08 ` Erich Focht
2003-07-29 14:41 ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-31 15:05 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-31 21:45 ` Erich Focht
2003-08-01 0:26 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-01 16:30 ` Erich Focht [this message]
2003-07-29 14:06 [Lse-tech] " Mala Anand
2003-07-29 14:29 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-29 16:04 Mala Anand
2003-07-30 16:34 Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200308011830.07280.efocht@hpce.nec.com \
--to=efocht@hpce.nec.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).