From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: habanero@us.ibm.com, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
Erich Focht <efocht@hpce.nec.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LSE <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>, Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
torvalds@osdl.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [patch] scheduler fix for 1cpu/node case
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 18:48:00 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F472A40.2010905@cyberone.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030823004743.GB3170@holomorphy.com>
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 10:29:21AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>>Hmm... get someone to try the scheduler benchmarks on a 32 way box ;)
>>
>
>What scheduler benchmark?
>
>
I don't know! I don't care about high end scheduler performance.
Volanomark? Kernbench? SDET? Whatever you care about.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-23 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-28 19:16 [patch] scheduler fix for 1cpu/node case Erich Focht
2003-07-28 19:55 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-28 20:18 ` Erich Focht
2003-07-28 20:37 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-29 2:24 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-07-29 10:08 ` Erich Focht
2003-07-29 13:33 ` [Lse-tech] " Andrew Theurer
2003-07-30 15:23 ` Erich Focht
2003-07-30 15:44 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-07-29 14:27 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-13 20:49 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-22 15:46 ` [Lse-tech] " Andrew Theurer
2003-08-22 22:56 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-23 0:12 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-08-23 0:29 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-23 0:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-23 8:48 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2003-08-23 14:32 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-08-23 1:31 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-29 10:08 ` Erich Focht
2003-07-29 14:41 ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-31 15:05 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-31 21:45 ` Erich Focht
2003-08-01 0:26 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-01 16:30 ` [Lse-tech] " Erich Focht
2003-07-29 14:06 Mala Anand
2003-07-29 14:29 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-29 16:04 Mala Anand
2003-07-30 16:34 Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F472A40.2010905@cyberone.com.au \
--to=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=efocht@hpce.nec.com \
--cc=habanero@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).