* milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree @ 2003-08-04 17:37 David Mosberger 2003-08-04 17:53 ` H. J. Lu ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: David Mosberger @ 2003-08-04 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ia64; +Cc: linux-kernel As of this morning, Linus's current bk tree (http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5) builds and works out of the box for ia64! Thanks to everybody who helped make this happen. In particular, thanks to Andrew Morton and Christoph Hellwig for their efforts, and Andy Grover for a last-minute ACPI patch! For maximum performance/stability, I'd still recommend to use the ia64-specific patches, but for someone who needs to build bleeding edge kernels for multiple architectures, being able to use Linus' tree should make it a lot easier to include ia64 in their regular testing etc. Now that Linus' tree works for ia64, the next question is how we can keep it that way. I think it would be useful to have someone setup a cron job which does daily builds/automated tests off of Linus tree. If something breaks, the person doing this could perhaps come up with a minimal patch which gets Linus' tree to build again (and submit a patch to the appropriate maintainer, with cc to the linux-ia64 list). I plan on continuing to put out roughly monthly ia64-specific patches and during those normal cycles, I'd then integrate the "quick fix up" patches as needed. Does this sound reasonable? Anybody want to volunteer for this "Linus watchdog" role? --david ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-08-04 17:37 milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree David Mosberger @ 2003-08-04 17:53 ` H. J. Lu 2003-08-04 18:00 ` Jesse Barnes 2003-08-04 18:21 ` David Mosberger 2003-08-04 18:31 ` David S. Miller 2003-08-04 23:06 ` Peter Chubb 2 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: H. J. Lu @ 2003-08-04 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: davidm; +Cc: linux-ia64, linux-kernel On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:37:39AM -0700, David Mosberger wrote: > As of this morning, Linus's current bk tree > (http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5) builds and works out of the > box for ia64! > Does it work on bigsur? Does it support kernel modules? H.J. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-08-04 17:53 ` H. J. Lu @ 2003-08-04 18:00 ` Jesse Barnes 2003-08-04 18:10 ` H. J. Lu 2003-08-04 18:27 ` David Mosberger 2003-08-04 18:21 ` David Mosberger 1 sibling, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jesse Barnes @ 2003-08-04 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H. J. Lu; +Cc: davidm, linux-ia64, linux-kernel On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:53:08AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:37:39AM -0700, David Mosberger wrote: > > As of this morning, Linus's current bk tree > > (http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5) builds and works out of the > > box for ia64! > > > > Does it work on bigsur? Does it support kernel modules? I just tried the latest on my big sur, and though I think modules work (at least they build for other machines), big sur is broken because non-ACPI based PCI enumeration has been removed from the tree. Jesse ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-08-04 18:00 ` Jesse Barnes @ 2003-08-04 18:10 ` H. J. Lu 2003-08-04 18:52 ` Jesse Barnes 2003-08-04 18:27 ` David Mosberger 1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: H. J. Lu @ 2003-08-04 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: davidm, linux-ia64, linux-kernel On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 11:00:16AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:53:08AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:37:39AM -0700, David Mosberger wrote: > > > As of this morning, Linus's current bk tree > > > (http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5) builds and works out of the > > > box for ia64! > > > > > > > Does it work on bigsur? Does it support kernel modules? > > I just tried the latest on my big sur, and though I think modules work > (at least they build for other machines), big sur is broken because > non-ACPI based PCI enumeration has been removed from the tree. > Can you try this patch for bigsur? H.J. --- --- linux/drivers/acpi/osl.c.acpi Mon Jul 28 11:41:53 2003 +++ linux/drivers/acpi/osl.c Mon Jul 28 15:12:44 2003 @@ -250,7 +250,12 @@ acpi_os_install_interrupt_handler(u32 ir irq = acpi_fadt.sci_int; #ifdef CONFIG_IA64 - irq = gsi_to_vector(irq); + irq = acpi_irq_to_vector (irq); + if (irq < 0) { + printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "SCI (IRQ%d/%d) not registerd\n", + irq, acpi_fadt.sci_int); + return AE_OK; + } #endif acpi_irq_irq = irq; acpi_irq_handler = handler; ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-08-04 18:10 ` H. J. Lu @ 2003-08-04 18:52 ` Jesse Barnes 2003-08-04 19:18 ` Andreas Schwab 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Jesse Barnes @ 2003-08-04 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H. J. Lu; +Cc: davidm, linux-ia64, linux-kernel Thanks H.J., this patch works for me! I had to add one more for xfs (included), but after that, things seemed to work. Thanks, Jesse On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 11:10:33AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 11:00:16AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:53:08AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:37:39AM -0700, David Mosberger wrote: > > > > As of this morning, Linus's current bk tree > > > > (http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5) builds and works out of the > > > > box for ia64! > > > > > > > > > > Does it work on bigsur? Does it support kernel modules? > > > > I just tried the latest on my big sur, and though I think modules work > > (at least they build for other machines), big sur is broken because > > non-ACPI based PCI enumeration has been removed from the tree. > > > > Can you try this patch for bigsur? diff -Nru a/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_vfs.h b/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_vfs.h --- a/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_vfs.h Wed Jul 16 12:10:39 2003 +++ b/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_vfs.h Wed Jul 16 12:10:39 2003 @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ typedef struct vfs { u_int vfs_flag; /* flags */ - fsid_t vfs_fsid; /* file system ID */ - fsid_t *vfs_altfsid; /* An ID fixed for life of FS */ + __kernel_fsid_t vfs_fsid; /* file system ID */ + __kernel_fsid_t *vfs_altfsid; /* An ID fixed for life of FS */ bhv_head_t vfs_bh; /* head of vfs behavior chain */ struct super_block *vfs_super; /* Linux superblock structure */ struct task_struct *vfs_sync_task; diff -Nru a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c Wed Jul 16 12:10:39 2003 +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c Wed Jul 16 12:10:39 2003 @@ -889,7 +889,7 @@ * File systems that don't support user level file handles (i.e. * all of them except for XFS) will leave vfs_altfsid as NULL. */ - vfsp->vfs_altfsid = (fsid_t *)mp->m_fixedfsid; + vfsp->vfs_altfsid = (__kernel_fsid_t *)mp->m_fixedfsid; mp->m_dmevmask = 0; /* not persistent; set after each mount */ /* ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-08-04 18:52 ` Jesse Barnes @ 2003-08-04 19:18 ` Andreas Schwab 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Andreas Schwab @ 2003-08-04 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H. J. Lu; +Cc: davidm, linux-ia64, linux-kernel jbarnes@sgi.com (Jesse Barnes) writes: |> diff -Nru a/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_vfs.h b/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_vfs.h |> --- a/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_vfs.h Wed Jul 16 12:10:39 2003 |> +++ b/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_vfs.h Wed Jul 16 12:10:39 2003 |> @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ |> |> typedef struct vfs { |> u_int vfs_flag; /* flags */ |> - fsid_t vfs_fsid; /* file system ID */ |> - fsid_t *vfs_altfsid; /* An ID fixed for life of FS */ |> + __kernel_fsid_t vfs_fsid; /* file system ID */ |> + __kernel_fsid_t *vfs_altfsid; /* An ID fixed for life of FS */ |> bhv_head_t vfs_bh; /* head of vfs behavior chain */ |> struct super_block *vfs_super; /* Linux superblock structure */ |> struct task_struct *vfs_sync_task; Alternatively you could use this patch (following the other architectures): --- linux-2.5.73/include/asm-ia64/statfs.h.~1~ 2003-06-22 20:32:55.000000000 +0200 +++ linux-2.5.73/include/asm-ia64/statfs.h 2003-07-01 16:14:44.000000000 +0200 @@ -6,6 +6,11 @@ * Copyright (C) 1998, 1999 David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com> */ +#ifndef __KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES +# include <linux/types.h> +typedef __kernel_fsid_t fsid_t; +#endif + /* * This is ugly --- we're already 64-bit, so just duplicate the definitions */ Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-08-04 18:00 ` Jesse Barnes 2003-08-04 18:10 ` H. J. Lu @ 2003-08-04 18:27 ` David Mosberger 2003-08-04 18:49 ` Jesse Barnes 1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: David Mosberger @ 2003-08-04 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jesse Barnes; +Cc: H. J. Lu, linux-ia64, linux-kernel >>>>> On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:00:16 -0700, jbarnes@sgi.com (Jesse Barnes) said: Jesse> big sur is broken because non-ACPI based PCI enumeration has Jesse> been removed from the tree. That shouldn't break big sur. Perhaps you need newer firmware, though? --david ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-08-04 18:27 ` David Mosberger @ 2003-08-04 18:49 ` Jesse Barnes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jesse Barnes @ 2003-08-04 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: davidm; +Cc: H. J. Lu, linux-ia64, linux-kernel On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 11:27:53AM -0700, David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:00:16 -0700, jbarnes@sgi.com (Jesse Barnes) said: > > Jesse> big sur is broken because non-ACPI based PCI enumeration has > Jesse> been removed from the tree. > > That shouldn't break big sur. Perhaps you need newer firmware, > though? You're right, I thought that big sur didn't use ACPI to enumerate PCI, but I guess it does. Jesse ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-08-04 17:53 ` H. J. Lu 2003-08-04 18:00 ` Jesse Barnes @ 2003-08-04 18:21 ` David Mosberger 2003-08-04 18:41 ` Jes Sorensen 1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: David Mosberger @ 2003-08-04 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H. J. Lu; +Cc: linux-ia64, linux-kernel >>>>> On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:53:08 -0700, "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> said: HJ> Does it work on bigsur? It should, apart from a qla1280.c glitch (see the latest ia64 diff for the one-liner to get it to work; Jes Sorensen said he's going to cleanup qla1280 for real). HJ> Does it support kernel modules? Sure. Kernel modules have been working for a while. You do need module-init-tools, of course (Debian has the necessary package in the "unstable" tree). --david ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-08-04 18:21 ` David Mosberger @ 2003-08-04 18:41 ` Jes Sorensen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jes Sorensen @ 2003-08-04 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: davidm; +Cc: H. J. Lu, linux-ia64, linux-kernel >>>>> "David" == David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> writes: >>>>> On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:53:08 -0700, "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> said: HJ> Does it work on bigsur? David> It should, apart from a qla1280.c glitch (see the latest ia64 David> diff for the one-liner to get it to work; Jes Sorensen said David> he's going to cleanup qla1280 for real). Yes, I already have in fact. I submitted the updated driver to James Bottomley for inclusion in the tree. I'll post it to you shortly. Cheers, Jes ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-08-04 17:37 milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree David Mosberger 2003-08-04 17:53 ` H. J. Lu @ 2003-08-04 18:31 ` David S. Miller 2003-08-04 18:40 ` David Mosberger 2003-08-04 23:06 ` Peter Chubb 2 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: David S. Miller @ 2003-08-04 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: davidm; +Cc: davidm, linux-ia64, linux-kernel On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:37:39 -0700 David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> wrote: > As of this morning, Linus's current bk tree > (http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5) builds and works out of the > box for ia64! I hate to rain on your parade, but for a platform that has so many companies paying people full time to maintain under Linux having it take this long is a big diasppointment for me :( I do sparc64 as a hobby in my spare time, as a single individual, and it has been working daily throughout the entire 2.4.x and 2.5.x series. The fact that there are still "external patches for performance" is even more disheartening. My tree never lags Linus's by more than 24 or 48 hours, unless one of us is on vacation and not near computers. And if I can do this in my spare time, it should be doable by people getting paid full time to maintain the ia64 port, don't you think? 8-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-08-04 18:31 ` David S. Miller @ 2003-08-04 18:40 ` David Mosberger 2003-08-04 18:45 ` David S. Miller 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: David Mosberger @ 2003-08-04 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David S. Miller; +Cc: linux-ia64, linux-kernel >>>>> On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:31:44 -0700, "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> said: Dave> My tree never lags Linus's by more than 24 or 48 hours, unless Dave> one of us is on vacation and not near computers. And if I can Dave> do this in my spare time, it should be doable by people Dave> getting paid full time to maintain the ia64 port, don't you Dave> think? 8-) Well, you're obviously just way better than everybody else! For what it's worth, I spend on average about 1 day a week on ia64 linux maintenance and that's just about as much as I'd want to (though in recent months it has been a bit more, partly so that we can get into sync with Linus' tree). --david ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-08-04 18:40 ` David Mosberger @ 2003-08-04 18:45 ` David S. Miller 2003-08-04 19:07 ` Alan Cox 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: David S. Miller @ 2003-08-04 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: davidm; +Cc: davidm, linux-ia64, linux-kernel On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:40:25 -0700 David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> wrote: > For what it's worth, I spend on average about 1 day a week on ia64 > linux maintenance and that's just about as much as I'd want to (though > in recent months it has been a bit more, partly so that we can get > into sync with Linus' tree). I'm not addressing you specifically, but I will note how great you tend to say ia64 is when platform performance comparison discussions happen on the lists :-) In general, I think some platform maintainence drifts way too easily into a tail-spin of local changes that take forever to get merged. My point was that if some random single monkey like me can keep a loser platform like sparc64 still building in Linus's tree, a group of several trained professionals should be able to fare much better :) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-08-04 18:45 ` David S. Miller @ 2003-08-04 19:07 ` Alan Cox 2003-08-04 19:17 ` David S. Miller 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Alan Cox @ 2003-08-04 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David S. Miller; +Cc: davidm, davidm, linux-ia64, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Llu, 2003-08-04 at 19:45, David S. Miller wrote: > My point was that if some random single monkey like me can keep a > loser platform like sparc64 still building in Linus's tree, a group of > several trained professionals should be able to fare much better :) Right but ia64 - for better or worse started off as a hideously divergent tree that did really stupid things like redefine GFP_DMA. It may be that ia64 should have aimed in a different direction from day one but having finally ended up in the right place *is* a milestone. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-08-04 19:07 ` Alan Cox @ 2003-08-04 19:17 ` David S. Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: David S. Miller @ 2003-08-04 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Cox; +Cc: davidm, davidm, linux-ia64, linux-kernel On 04 Aug 2003 20:07:58 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > but having finally ended up in the right place *is* a milestone. I agree. I apologize, I really didn't want to diminsh what has been accomplished. I was trying to achieve something different :) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-08-04 17:37 milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree David Mosberger 2003-08-04 17:53 ` H. J. Lu 2003-08-04 18:31 ` David S. Miller @ 2003-08-04 23:06 ` Peter Chubb 2003-08-04 23:35 ` David Mosberger 2 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Peter Chubb @ 2003-08-04 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: davidm; +Cc: linux-ia64, linux-kernel >>>>> "David" == David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> writes: David> Now that Linus' tree works for ia64, the next question is how David> we can keep it that way. I think it would be useful to have David> someone setup a cron job which does daily builds/automated David> tests off of Linus tree. If something breaks, the person doing David> this could perhaps come up with a minimal patch which gets David> Linus' tree to build again (and submit a patch to the David> appropriate maintainer, with cc to the linux-ia64 list). I David> plan on continuing to put out roughly monthly ia64-specific David> patches and during those normal cycles, I'd then integrate the David> "quick fix up" patches as needed. Does this sound reasonable? David> Anybody want to volunteer for this "Linus watchdog" role? We can do this. We're tracking Linus's tree anyway for the work we're doing. We'd probably do daily automated builds to check that the kernel still compiles cleanly for HPSIM, DIG, and ZX1, but test only weekly. If you have anyu specific configuration options you think should be included, let us know. -- Dr Peter Chubb http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au peterc AT gelato.unsw.edu.au You are lost in a maze of BitKeeper repositories, all slightly different. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-08-04 23:06 ` Peter Chubb @ 2003-08-04 23:35 ` David Mosberger 2003-08-13 0:07 ` Ian Wienand 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: David Mosberger @ 2003-08-04 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Chubb; +Cc: linux-ia64, linux-kernel >>>>> On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:06:18 +1000, Peter Chubb <peter@chubb.wattle.id.au> said: >>>>> "David" == David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> writes: David> Now that Linus' tree works for ia64, the next question is how David> we can keep it that way. I think it would be useful to have David> someone setup a cron job which does daily builds/automated David> tests off of Linus tree. If something breaks, the person doing David> this could perhaps come up with a minimal patch which gets David> Linus' tree to build again (and submit a patch to the David> appropriate maintainer, with cc to the linux-ia64 list). I David> plan on continuing to put out roughly monthly ia64-specific David> patches and during those normal cycles, I'd then integrate the David> "quick fix up" patches as needed. Does this sound reasonable? David> Anybody want to volunteer for this "Linus watchdog" role? Peter> We can do this. We're tracking Linus's tree anyway for the work we're Peter> doing. Excellent! Peter> We'd probably do daily automated builds to check that the kernel Peter> still compiles cleanly for HPSIM, DIG, and ZX1, but test only weekly. Sounds reasonable. Except doing a boot/halt cycle on the simulator should be easy to automate, no? The simulator can actually catch a surprising number of problems. Peter> If you have anyu specific configuration options you think should be Peter> included, let us know. Nothing in particular, though it would be good to cover UP, MP, 16, and 64KB page sizes (not in all permutations, of course). Thanks, --david ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-08-04 23:35 ` David Mosberger @ 2003-08-13 0:07 ` Ian Wienand 2003-09-10 0:53 ` Ian Wienand 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Ian Wienand @ 2003-08-13 0:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ia64; +Cc: linux-kernel On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:35:32PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote: > David> Now that Linus' tree works for ia64, the next question is how > David> we can keep it that way. I think it would be useful to have > David> someone setup a cron job which does daily builds/automated > David> tests off of Linus tree. > > Peter> We'd probably do daily automated builds to check that the kernel > Peter> still compiles cleanly for HPSIM, DIG, and ZX1, but test only weekly. It has been running OK for a few days now, so please feel free to check out http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/kerncomp for the status of daily IA64 builds. We will attempt to keep track of what is happening and fix anything that needs fixing or point to where it has been fixed. We're still working on automated testing (i.e. booting on the simulator, maybe real hardware). -i ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-08-13 0:07 ` Ian Wienand @ 2003-09-10 0:53 ` Ian Wienand 2003-09-10 1:57 ` David Mosberger 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Ian Wienand @ 2003-09-10 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ia64; +Cc: linux-kernel On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 10:07:51AM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote: > We're still working on automated testing (i.e. booting on the > simulator, maybe real hardware). For those who are interested, we now attempt to boot the autobuilt kernels on the simulator daily. See http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/kerncomp/simboot.php -i ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree 2003-09-10 0:53 ` Ian Wienand @ 2003-09-10 1:57 ` David Mosberger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: David Mosberger @ 2003-09-10 1:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ian Wienand; +Cc: linux-ia64, linux-kernel >>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:53:17 +1000, Ian Wienand <ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au> said: Ian> On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 10:07:51AM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote: >> We're still working on automated testing (i.e. booting on the >> simulator, maybe real hardware). Ian> For those who are interested, we now attempt to boot the autobuilt Ian> kernels on the simulator daily. See Ian> http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/kerncomp/simboot.php Very nice! (The test setup & web-page, not the fact that the boot failed... ;-). As for perfmon under Ski: the latest perfmon should have the necessary code, but I don't remember whether it made it into test5 already (and I don't have CONFIG_PERFMON enabled in my Ski setup). If it's not there already, it should be there tomorrow, as Linus pulled on the ia64 repository a couple of hours ago. --david ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-10 1:57 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2003-08-04 17:37 milstone reached: ia64 linux builds out of Linus' tree David Mosberger 2003-08-04 17:53 ` H. J. Lu 2003-08-04 18:00 ` Jesse Barnes 2003-08-04 18:10 ` H. J. Lu 2003-08-04 18:52 ` Jesse Barnes 2003-08-04 19:18 ` Andreas Schwab 2003-08-04 18:27 ` David Mosberger 2003-08-04 18:49 ` Jesse Barnes 2003-08-04 18:21 ` David Mosberger 2003-08-04 18:41 ` Jes Sorensen 2003-08-04 18:31 ` David S. Miller 2003-08-04 18:40 ` David Mosberger 2003-08-04 18:45 ` David S. Miller 2003-08-04 19:07 ` Alan Cox 2003-08-04 19:17 ` David S. Miller 2003-08-04 23:06 ` Peter Chubb 2003-08-04 23:35 ` David Mosberger 2003-08-13 0:07 ` Ian Wienand 2003-09-10 0:53 ` Ian Wienand 2003-09-10 1:57 ` David Mosberger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).