Re: Console on USB

Re: Console on USB

[Pete Zaitcev]

>   So I ordered a USB to serial converter, configured a 2.6.0-test3 
> kernel, added a console=/dev/ttyUSB0 to the kernel command line and 
> connected this to my desktop with a null modem adapter.

What made you think this will work?!

> Is there any advice I might be able to use to get this going?

You'd have to write it. Grep for register_console for starters.
But I do not advise it, see below.

>  I really want to be able to catch some oops output.

If oops happens with interrupts closed, forget about it.
USB needs interrupts to work. This is one of the reasons nobody
bothered to implement console over USB serial.

You will have a better chance using Ingo's netconsole, if a patch
for your Ethernet driver exists.

-- Pete

Re: Console on USB

[Randy.Dunlap]

>>   So I ordered a USB to serial converter, configured a 2.6.0-test3
>> kernel, added a console=/dev/ttyUSB0 to the kernel command line and
>> connected this to my desktop with a null modem adapter.
>
> What made you think this will work?!

Maybe the drivers/usb/serial/Kconfig file?

config USB_SERIAL_CONSOLE
        bool "USB Serial Console device support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
        depends on USB_SERIAL=y && EXPERIMENTAL

>> Is there any advice I might be able to use to get this going?
>
> You'd have to write it. Grep for register_console for starters.
> But I do not advise it, see below.

usb/serial/console.c:255:         register_console(&usbcons);

>>  I really want to be able to catch some oops output.
>
> If oops happens with interrupts closed, forget about it.
> USB needs interrupts to work. This is one of the reasons nobody
> bothered to implement console over USB serial.

The call to register_console() also happens very late in the boot
sequence, so if your oops is early, USB console won't help.

> You will have a better chance using Ingo's netconsole, if a patch
> for your Ethernet driver exists.

Certainly, I agree.

~Randy

Re: Console on USB

[Pete Zaitcev]

> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 21:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>

> >> Is there any advice I might be able to use to get this going?
> >
> > You'd have to write it. Grep for register_console for starters.
> 
> usb/serial/console.c:255:         register_console(&usbcons);

Eeek, eating a crow now.

> >>  I really want to be able to catch some oops output.
> >
> > If oops happens with interrupts closed, forget about it.
> > USB needs interrupts to work. This is one of the reasons nobody
> > bothered to implement console over USB serial.
> 
> The call to register_console() also happens very late in the boot
> sequence, so if your oops is early, USB console won't help.

It's true for many consoles, that's why sparc allows
"-p" in SILO options, for instance. I think either wli or willy
did "early VGA printk" patch.

Interrupts are a major problem. Also, the USB stack is pretty
thick.

-- Pete

Re: Console on USB

[Zwane Mwaikambo]

On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote:

> > You will have a better chance using Ingo's netconsole, if a patch
> > for your Ethernet driver exists.
> 
> Certainly, I agree.

I think Matt Mackall has an updated patch which looks frightfully easy to 
add device support to, i think he may have even made it generic (he 
basically just calls netdriver isrs)

Re: Console on USB

[John Bradford]

> > > > Is there any advice I might be able to use to get this going?  I really 
> > > > want to be able to catch some oops output.
> > >
> > > Buy a machine with a serial port.  That's my recommendation :)
> > 
> > That could be difficult in a few years time.  What are we going to do
> > when we start getting bugs that are only reproducable on laptops with
> > no legacy ports? 
>
> Use the previously mentioned netconsole code.

Yeah, I guess everything will have Ethernet onboard by then :-).

John.

Re: Console on USB

[John Bradford]

> > Is there any advice I might be able to use to get this going?  I really 
> > want to be able to catch some oops output.
>
> Buy a machine with a serial port.  That's my recommendation :)

That could be difficult in a few years time.  What are we going to do
when we start getting bugs that are only reproducable on laptops with
no legacy ports? 

John.

Re: Console on USB

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 06:08:45PM +0100, John Bradford wrote:
> > > Is there any advice I might be able to use to get this going?  I really 
> > > want to be able to catch some oops output.
> >
> > Buy a machine with a serial port.  That's my recommendation :)
> 
> That could be difficult in a few years time.  What are we going to do
> when we start getting bugs that are only reproducable on laptops with
> no legacy ports? 

Use the previously mentioned netconsole code.

Or use a firewire debug console, like some of the BSDs and Windows do
today.

Good luck,

greg k-h

Console on USB

[Thomas Molina]

I have just spent a very frustrating evening trying to get console on USB 
working.  My laptop does not have regular DB-9 serial connectors, only 
USB.  So I ordered a USB to serial converter, configured a 2.6.0-test3 
kernel, added a console=/dev/ttyUSB0 to the kernel command line and 
connected this to my desktop with a null modem adapter.  However, I am 
unable to get output from this setup on the desktop.  On another setup I 
can get a normal serial console output, so I am fairly confident I can set 
things up correctly.

Googling around and doing a search on lkml archives gave some minimal 
help, but I can find very little info past early to mid 2.5 kernels.  The 
configuration doesn't quite seem to work the way I read documentation.  
For instance, the web pages I can find indicate I should be able to build 
this modular; however the configuration makes the setting of console on 
usb depend on USB being y and EXPERIMENTAL being defined.  

In /var/log/messages I can see the USB-to-serial converter being recogized 
and the driver being loaded, just before the synaptics touchpad is probed.

It looks like things are correct, but, as I said, I am unable to get 
output.  Am I headed for frustration, or is there some advice to get good 
results?  

Is there any advice I might be able to use to get this going?  I really 
want to be able to catch some oops output.

Re: Console on USB

[Zwane Mwaikambo]

On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Thomas Molina wrote:

> It looks like things are correct, but, as I said, I am unable to get 
> output.  Am I headed for frustration, or is there some advice to get good 
> results?  
> 
> Is there any advice I might be able to use to get this going?  I really 
> want to be able to catch some oops output.

How about forgetting the console= part and just booting and then set the 
console log level so that you're able to get oopses to hit the USB 
console.

Re: Console on USB

[stefan.eletzhofer]

Hi,
AFAIK there was a network console patch on the list recently.

IIRC it sends UDP packets to a receiving daemon (or netcat ;),
and works w/o interrupts. I believe, though, that there are
only certain nics supported.

Cheers,
	Stefan E.
-- 
Eletztrick Computing - Customized Linux Development
Stefan Eletzhofer, Marktstrasse 43, DE-88214 Ravensburg
http://www.eletztrick.de

Re: Console on USB

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 10:20:51PM -0500, Thomas Molina wrote:
> I have just spent a very frustrating evening trying to get console on USB 
> working.  My laptop does not have regular DB-9 serial connectors, only 
> USB.  So I ordered a USB to serial converter,

Which usb to serial converter?  Not all of them work with Linux.  Does
this device work with Linux _not_ as a serial console device?

> configured a 2.6.0-test3 
> kernel, added a console=/dev/ttyUSB0 to the kernel command line and 
> connected this to my desktop with a null modem adapter.  However, I am 
> unable to get output from this setup on the desktop.  On another setup I 
> can get a normal serial console output, so I am fairly confident I can set 
> things up correctly.

Which "serial console" are you trying to get working?  The kernel log
console, or a login console?

> Googling around and doing a search on lkml archives gave some minimal 
> help, but I can find very little info past early to mid 2.5 kernels.  The 
> configuration doesn't quite seem to work the way I read documentation.  
> For instance, the web pages I can find indicate I should be able to build 
> this modular; however the configuration makes the setting of console on 
> usb depend on USB being y and EXPERIMENTAL being defined.  

What web page says you can build this modular?  You have to build it
into the kernel.

> In /var/log/messages I can see the USB-to-serial converter being recogized 
> and the driver being loaded, just before the synaptics touchpad is probed.

Can you show us the relevant part of the kernel logs?

> It looks like things are correct, but, as I said, I am unable to get 
> output.  Am I headed for frustration, or is there some advice to get good 
> results?  

You are headed for frustration.  USB serial console was a neat hack, but
pretty pointless.  It has the following problems:
	- can't see oopses before USB starts up, and USB starts up
	  almost last in the system boot process.
	- really can not capture oopses very well as USB is interrupt
	  driven
	- most usb-serial converters have a very small buffer, so you
	  constantly get over-runs in printing out console messages
	  (meaning that only a few of the devices will even work
	  properly, you usually have to buy one of the expensive ones to
	  see all messages.)

> Is there any advice I might be able to use to get this going?  I really 
> want to be able to catch some oops output.

Buy a machine with a serial port.  That's my recommendation :)

Good luck,

greg k-h

Re: Console on USB

[root]

> 
> I have just spent a very frustrating evening trying to get console on USB 
> working.  My laptop does not have regular DB-9 serial connectors, only 
> USB.  So I ordered a USB to serial converter, configured a 2.6.0-test3 
> kernel, added a console=/dev/ttyUSB0 to the kernel command line and 
> connected this to my desktop with a null modem adapter.  However, I am 
> unable to get output from this setup on the desktop.  On another setup I 
> can get a normal serial console output, so I am fairly confident I can set 
> things up correctly.

For laptops, might console=/dev/irda work?

Re: Console on USB

[Valdis.Kletnieks]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 314 bytes --]

On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:44:58 BST, root@mauve.demon.co.uk said:

> For laptops, might console=/dev/irda work?

Hmm.... <looks around>  Do I have anything handy that will *catch* stuff being
spewed out the irda port?  Don't think so, or I'd have built that driver....

Yes, might work, *if* you have hardware handy.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]

Re: Console on USB

[Randy.Dunlap]

On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:56:18 -0400 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:

| On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:44:58 BST, root@mauve.demon.co.uk said:
| 
| > For laptops, might console=/dev/irda work?
| 
| Hmm.... <looks around>  Do I have anything handy that will *catch* stuff being
| spewed out the irda port?  Don't think so, or I'd have built that driver....
| 
| Yes, might work, *if* you have hardware handy.

I don't see any console support in the irda drivers...
How is it supposed to work?
or do you just mean that in theory it could be made to work?

--
~Randy   [MOTD:  Always include kernel version.]
"Everything is relative."

Re: Console on USB

[Valdis.Kletnieks]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 585 bytes --]

On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 11:07:42 PDT, "Randy.Dunlap" said:

> I don't see any console support in the irda drivers...
> How is it supposed to work?
> or do you just mean that in theory it could be made to work?

Well, in theory..   The problem is that for irda to work, you'd need a *second*
device that did irda to catch the bits - and I don't have a good feel for how
many of the kernel hackers that would use this have a second irda-capable box -
probably a lot less than have a second box that does USB....

Now if that damned RJ-11 for the LoseModem was useful for something... ;)





[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]

Re: Console on USB

[root]

> 
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:56:18 -0400 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> 
> | On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:44:58 BST, root@mauve.demon.co.uk said:
> | 
> | > For laptops, might console=/dev/irda work?
> | 
> | Hmm.... <looks around>  Do I have anything handy that will *catch* stuff being
> | spewed out the irda port?  Don't think so, or I'd have built that driver....
> | 
> | Yes, might work, *if* you have hardware handy.
> 
> I don't see any console support in the irda drivers...
> How is it supposed to work?
> or do you just mean that in theory it could be made to work?

I last looked at irda, when my laptop was a 486/745, and thought that
the hardware still looked more or less like a 8250 variant.
I had previously used /dev/ttyS1 (where that was an IR port) to dump
debugging data.

Looking at the documentation for more recent hardware, I find this isn't really
the case any more for all hardware.