From: Antonio Vargas <wind@cocodriloo.com>
To: Shantanu Goel <sgoel01@yahoo.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
Antonio Vargas <wind@cocodriloo.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>
Subject: Re: [VM PATCH] Faster reclamation of dirty pages and unused inode/dcache entries in 2.4.22
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 07:01:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030830050111.GD640@wind.cocodriloo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030829202001.38031.qmail@web12807.mail.yahoo.com>
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:20:01PM -0700, Shantanu Goel wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer to the benchmarks.
>
> The patch I posted only helps the mmap case so it
> won't help (or hurt hopefully ;-) any program that
> primarily does read/write instead of mmap. The
> extreme case where I observed this was a perl script
> that created a gigantic hash and tried to populate it.
I've experienced this workload and it's easily reproducible:
get the lxr tools and try to build the indexes.
> The perl in question uses mmap for malloc. The
> difference in execution time between stock 2.4.22 and
> one with the patch was insignificant because it is
> primarily I/O bound, however the other apps I was
> running, Mozilla and several xterm's, were paged out
> much less frequently in the latter case. The machine
> has 256MB of memory and perl grew to about 1 GB.
>
> I have written another patch that more aggresively
> tries to free pages with dirty buffers which should
> help with the buffer I/O case. It essentially changes
> try_to_free_buffers() so it immediately starts and
> waits for I/O to complete if the gfp_mask allows it.
> It does not do any clustering so its performance is
> questionable at the moment.
>
> --- Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:46:36PM -0700, Shantanu
> > Goel wrote:
> > > Andrea,
> > >
> > > I'll test and submit a patch against -aa. Also,
> > is
> > > there a common benchmark that you use to test for
> > > regression?
> >
> > bonnie,tiobench,dbench would be a very good start
> > for the basics (note:
> > dbench can be misleading, but at the same fariness
> > levels, it's
> > interesting too, it's just that dbench doesn't
> > measure the fariness
> > level itself [like tiobench started doing relatively
> > recently]).
> >
> > (I'm assuming the patch makes difference not only
> > for mmapped dirty
> > pages, in such case the above would be non
> > interesting)
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Andrea
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
> http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
--
winden/network
1. Dado un programa, siempre tiene al menos un fallo.
2. Dadas varias lineas de codigo, siempre se pueden acortar a menos lineas.
3. Por induccion, todos los programas se pueden
reducir a una linea que no funciona.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-30 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-29 15:01 [VM PATCH] Faster reclamation of dirty pages and unused inode/dcache entries in 2.4.22 Shantanu Goel
2003-08-29 14:57 ` Antonio Vargas
2003-08-29 17:55 ` Shantanu Goel
2003-08-29 18:06 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-29 18:46 ` Shantanu Goel
2003-08-29 18:57 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-29 19:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-29 19:46 ` Shantanu Goel
2003-08-29 19:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-29 20:20 ` Shantanu Goel
2003-08-30 5:01 ` Antonio Vargas [this message]
2003-09-20 13:39 ` A couple of 2.4.23-pre4 VM nits Shantanu Goel
2003-09-21 2:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-09-21 5:32 ` Shantanu Goel
2003-09-21 14:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-09-21 14:51 ` Shantanu Goel
2003-09-21 15:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-09-21 15:28 ` Shantanu Goel
2003-09-21 15:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-09-21 18:37 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-29 19:11 ` [VM PATCH] Faster reclamation of dirty pages and unused inode/dcache entries in 2.4.22 Rahul Karnik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030830050111.GD640@wind.cocodriloo.com \
--to=wind@cocodriloo.com \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
--cc=sgoel01@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).