From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] mtime&ctime updated when it should not
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 15:48:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030901224829.GG31760@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030901183527.GB21251@DUK2.13thfloor.at>
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 08:35:27PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 08:11:13PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > one user pointed my attention to the fact that when the write fails
> > (for example when the user quota is exceeded) the modification time is
> > still updated (the problem appears both in 2.4 and 2.6). According to
> > SUSv3 that should not happen because the specification says that mtime
> > and ctime should be marked for update upon a successful completition
> > of a write (not that it would forbid updating the times in other cases
> > but I find it at least a bit nonintuitive).
> > The easiest fix would be probably to "backup" the times at the
> > beginning of the write and restore the original values when the write
> > fails (simply not updating the times would require more surgery because
> > for example vmtruncate() is called when the write fails and it also
> > updates the times).
> > So should I write the patch or is the current behaviour considered
> > correct?
>
> hmm, what if the request only partially succeeds?
>
> for example echo "five" >/tmp/x will create /tmp/x
> if inode limit permits it, but will leave it empty
> if the space limit does not ...
>
> personally I wouldn't care about the modification
> time on such a quota fault ...
At least you would know when the truncate happened, even if the write didn't
complete successfully.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-01 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-01 18:11 [BUG] mtime&ctime updated when it should not Jan Kara
2003-09-01 18:35 ` Herbert Poetzl
2003-09-01 19:05 ` Jan Kara
2003-09-01 22:48 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2003-09-01 19:18 ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-01 19:31 ` Jan Kara
2003-09-01 19:58 ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-02 13:06 ` Jan Kara
2003-09-06 8:05 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030901224829.GG31760@matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).