From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkml-031028@amos.mailshell.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.0test9 Reiserfs boot time "buffer layer error at fs/buffer.c:431"
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 14:19:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031029141931.6c4ebdb5.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200310292149.h9TLnsNq024151@car.linuxhacker.ru>
Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> >> Here are the results (output of dmesg) from booting a kernel with this
> >> patch:
> >> set_blocksize: size=4096
> >> buffer layer error at fs/buffer.c:431
> AM> hm, that didn't tell us much :(
> AM> Could you add Oleg's patch as well?
>
> Actually it will say that device's block size is 4096 (confirming
> last set_blocksize was at least partially succesful),
Assuming that the printk is for the correct filesystem, yes.
> but what
> it does not tell us is how those buffers have survived after blocksize
> was changed and all buffers were invalidated.
Well reiserfs shouldn't be doing this:
bh = sb_bread (s, offset / s->s_blocksize);
...
sb_set_blocksize (s, sb_blocksize(rs));
brelse (bh);
but still, truncate_inode_pages() should be removing all those pages
unconditionally.
> (These buffers are there because reiserfs first reads that offset (in bytes)
> with whatever current blocksize is, except they should have been invalidated of
> course).
> Even if invalidate_bdev() -> invalidate_inode_pages() have not cleaned
> everything, truncate_inode_pages() should have done this.
yup.
> So probably this page means do_invalidate_page() ... -> try_to_free_buffers()
> have failed for whatever reason.
See the pinned buffer, above.
> We did not write there yet, so this is not PageWriteback case.
> But if the read is still going on, I guess we won't free the page/buffers?
> Or am I missing some wait_on_buffer()?
> But anyway that might explains buffers being still in page, but not such
> a page present in a mapping. (except if we have not pickup this page from a list
> of free pages not looking that it still have stale buffers)
Yes, the page should have been removed from the mapping.
Amos, could you add this as well?
25-akpm/mm/truncate.c | 8 ++++++++
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff -puN mm/truncate.c~truncate_inode_pages-check mm/truncate.c
--- 25/mm/truncate.c~truncate_inode_pages-check Wed Oct 29 14:13:43 2003
+++ 25-akpm/mm/truncate.c Wed Oct 29 14:15:06 2003
@@ -174,6 +174,14 @@ void truncate_inode_pages(struct address
}
pagevec_release(&pvec);
}
+
+ if (lstart == 0) {
+ WARN_ON(mapping->nrpages);
+ WARN_ON(!list_empty(&mapping->clean_pages));
+ WARN_ON(!list_empty(&mapping->dirty_pages));
+ WARN_ON(!list_empty(&mapping->locked_pages));
+ WARN_ON(!list_empty(&mapping->io_pages));
+ }
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(truncate_inode_pages);
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-29 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-28 15:49 2.6.0test9 Reiserfs boot time "buffer layer error at fs/buffer.c:431" lkml-031028
2003-10-28 18:36 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-28 20:27 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-10-28 22:13 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-28 22:15 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-29 6:56 ` lkml-031028
2003-10-29 17:44 ` lkml-031028
2003-10-29 20:31 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-29 21:49 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-10-29 22:19 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2003-10-30 6:22 ` lkml-031028
2003-10-30 6:51 ` lkml-031028
2003-11-02 7:17 ` Herbert Xu
2003-11-02 7:33 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-02 9:18 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-11-02 9:27 ` Herbert Xu
2003-11-02 9:40 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-02 9:54 ` Herbert Xu
2003-11-02 11:54 ` Hans Reiser
2003-11-02 21:09 ` Herbert Xu
2003-11-03 10:20 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-11-04 8:10 ` Hans Reiser
2003-11-04 21:03 ` Debian Kernels was: " Mike Fedyk
2003-11-04 9:54 ` Hans Reiser
2003-11-04 23:49 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-11-05 0:05 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-11-16 13:05 ` Pavel Machek
2003-11-16 3:55 ` Hans Reiser
2003-11-16 14:15 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-11-16 17:05 ` Pavel Machek
2003-11-16 17:27 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-11-16 17:40 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-11-16 18:38 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-11-16 22:54 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-11-16 17:30 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-11-02 11:50 ` Hans Reiser
2003-11-02 20:33 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031029141931.6c4ebdb5.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=green@linuxhacker.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml-031028@amos.mailshell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).