From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Chris Vine <chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test9 - poor swap performance on low end machines
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 09:30:56 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200311050930.56909.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200311042208.05748.chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk>
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 09:08, Chris Vine wrote:
> Your diagnosis looks right, but two points -
>
> 1. The test compile was not of the kernel but of a file in a C++ program
> using quite a lot of templates and therefore which is quite memory
> intensive (for the sake of choosing something, it was a compile of
> src/main.o in
> http://www.cvine.freeserve.co.uk/efax-gtk/efax-gtk-2.2.2.src.tgz). It
> would be a sad day if the kernel could not be compiled under 2.6 in 32MB of
> memory, and I am glad to say that it does compile - my 2.6.0-test9 kernel
> compiles on the 32MB machine in on average 45 minutes 13 seconds under
> kernel 2.4.22, and in 54 minutes 11 seconds under 2.6.0-test9 with your
> latest patch, which is not an enormous difference. (As a digression, in
> the 2.0 days the kernel would compile in 6 minutes on the machine in
> question, and at the time I was very impressed.)
Phew. It would be sad if it couldn't compile a kernel indeed.
>
> 2. Being able to choose a manual setting for swappiness is not "futile".
> As I mentioned in an earlier post, a swappiness of 10 will enable
> 2.6.0-test9 to compile the things I threw at it on a low end machine,
> albeit slowly, whereas with dynamic swappiness it would not compile at all.
> So the difference is between being able to do something and not being able
> to do it.
I agree with you on that; I meant it would be futile trying to get the compile
times back to 2.4 levels with just this tunable modified alone (statically or
dynamically)... which means we should look elsewhere for ways to tackle this.
Con
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-04 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-29 22:30 2.6.0-test9 - poor swap performance on low end machines Chris Vine
2003-10-31 3:57 ` Rik van Riel
2003-10-31 11:26 ` Roger Luethi
2003-10-31 12:37 ` Con Kolivas
2003-10-31 12:59 ` Roger Luethi
2003-10-31 12:55 ` Ed Tomlinson
2003-11-01 18:34 ` Pasi Savolainen
2003-11-06 18:40 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-31 21:52 ` Chris Vine
2003-11-02 23:06 ` Chris Vine
2003-11-03 0:48 ` Con Kolivas
2003-11-03 21:13 ` Chris Vine
2003-11-04 2:55 ` Con Kolivas
2003-11-04 22:08 ` Chris Vine
2003-11-04 22:30 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2003-12-08 13:52 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-08 14:23 ` Con Kolivas
2003-12-08 14:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-09 21:03 ` Chris Vine
2003-12-13 14:08 ` Chris Vine
2003-12-08 19:49 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-08 20:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-09 0:27 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-09 4:05 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-09 15:11 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-09 16:04 ` Rik van Riel
2003-12-09 16:31 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-09 18:31 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-09 19:38 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-10 13:58 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-10 17:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-10 22:23 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-11 0:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-10 21:04 ` Rik van Riel
2003-12-10 23:17 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-11 1:31 ` Rik van Riel
2003-12-11 10:16 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-10 23:30 ` Helge Hafting
2003-12-10 21:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-12-10 22:05 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-10 22:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-12-11 1:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-11 1:32 ` Rik van Riel
2003-12-11 10:16 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-15 23:31 ` Andrew Morton
2003-12-15 23:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-12-15 23:54 ` Andrew Morton
2003-12-16 0:17 ` Rik van Riel
2003-12-16 11:23 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-16 16:29 ` Rik van Riel
2003-12-17 11:03 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-17 11:06 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-17 16:50 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-17 11:33 ` Rik van Riel
2003-12-17 18:53 ` Rik van Riel
2003-12-17 19:27 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-17 19:51 ` Rik van Riel
2003-12-17 19:49 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-17 21:41 ` Andrew Morton
2003-12-17 21:41 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-18 0:21 ` Rik van Riel
2003-12-18 22:53 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-18 23:38 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200311050930.56909.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).