archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bert hubert <>
To: Marc Haber <>
Subject: Re: 2.4.21 sending out "need to fragment" on wrong interface
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:26:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:29:17AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using a Linux machine with freeS/WAN for my connectivity. The
> default route points to the IPSEC link. It has recently begun to send
> out "need to fragment" packets on the wrong interface.

Linux-kernel is mostly about unpatched kernels, have you taken this up with
the freeswan people?

--      Open source, database driven DNS Software           Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO

      reply	other threads:[~2003-11-12 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-03  7:29 2.4.21 sending out "need to fragment" on wrong interface Marc Haber
2003-11-12 14:26 ` bert hubert [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).