From: Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@sfgoth.com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Increasing HZ (patch for HZ > 1000)
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:20:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031216052034.GI70731@gaz.sfgoth.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1071543853.989.183.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>
john stultz wrote:
> Indeed, with all the trouble HZ==1000 has caused, I'm thinking that
> playing w/ HZ at 10k and 10 would be good stress tests for the time
> subsystem.
I think setting HZ much lower than 100 might break some drivers that
do things like:
timeout = jiffies + (HZ / 50);
Not sure if any of the common drivers have this problem but be on the
lookout for it if you want to try running w/ really low HZ.
I suppose there should really be a "FRACTION_OF_SECOND()" macro or something
that always returns >0 for specifying these really short delays.
-Mitch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-16 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-11 6:05 Increasing HZ (patch for HZ > 1000) Jean-Marc Valin
2003-12-11 7:07 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-11 7:15 ` Jean-Marc Valin
2003-12-11 7:18 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-11 17:18 ` Gene Heskett
2003-12-11 17:33 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-11 18:10 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-12-11 19:14 ` Gene Heskett
2003-12-11 18:35 ` Gene Heskett
2003-12-12 22:08 ` Pavel Machek
2003-12-12 22:57 ` Jean-Marc Valin
2003-12-12 23:18 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-12 23:40 ` Pavel Machek
2003-12-13 2:25 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-16 3:04 ` john stultz
2003-12-16 5:20 ` Mitchell Blank Jr [this message]
2003-12-14 1:05 ` bill davidsen
2003-12-14 4:48 ` Pat Erley
2003-12-11 7:30 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-11 8:25 ` Tim Schmielau
2003-12-12 8:00 ` Jean-Marc Valin
2003-12-12 22:10 ` Pavel Machek
2003-12-12 22:50 ` Jean-Marc Valin
2004-01-03 18:16 ` Bill Davidsen
[not found] ` <010f01c415a4_27033d00_d100000a@sbs2003.local>
2004-04-06 13:00 ` Pavel Machek
2003-12-11 19:22 Grover, Andrew
2003-12-12 22:31 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-12-12 22:58 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-12-12 23:45 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-12-13 8:36 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-12-12 15:52 Vincent Legoll
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031216052034.GI70731@gaz.sfgoth.com \
--to=mitch@sfgoth.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).