From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
raybry@sgi.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mask ADT: new mask.h file [2/22]
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 18:07:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040330020700.GC791@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040330012744.GZ791@holomorphy.com>
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 05:27:44PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> ... and all other operations unmodified. In all honesty, the difference
> in overhead and/or implementation complexity between the two invariants
> is miniscule. I don't care who wants what per se; if you want to change
> that invariant, it's not my concern what the invariant is so long as
> it's respected and there's a coherent notion of what people want it to
> be. Given some of your statements, I wonder sometimes if you actually
> understand the "don't care" invariant.
Sorry, that was directed at Paul.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-30 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-29 12:12 [PATCH] mask ADT: new mask.h file [2/22] Paul Jackson
2004-03-30 0:30 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-03-30 0:27 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-30 1:56 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-03-30 0:47 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-30 1:53 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-03-30 2:06 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-30 1:31 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-30 1:27 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-30 1:27 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-30 6:38 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-30 8:45 ` Paul Jackson
2004-03-30 10:19 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-31 0:16 ` Ray Bryant
2004-03-31 0:14 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-03-30 2:07 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-04-01 0:38 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-04-01 0:58 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-01 1:11 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-04-01 1:18 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-01 1:27 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-01 1:35 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-05 1:26 ` Rusty Russell
2004-04-05 7:05 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-05 7:42 ` Rusty Russell
2004-04-05 8:08 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 4:59 ` Rusty Russell
2004-04-06 6:06 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 6:23 ` Nick Piggin
2004-04-06 6:34 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 6:49 ` Nick Piggin
2004-04-06 6:59 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 7:08 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 7:03 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-04-06 7:33 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 6:39 ` Rusty Russell
2004-04-06 6:45 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 7:24 ` Rusty Russell
2004-04-06 7:34 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 10:40 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-07 0:02 ` Rusty Russell
2004-04-07 1:49 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-07 3:55 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 6:55 ` Nick Piggin
2004-04-06 7:34 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-06 7:02 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-05 7:46 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040330020700.GC791@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=raybry@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).