From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
To: lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Takayoshi Kochi <t-kochi@bq.jp.nec.com>,
colpatch@us.ibm.com, pj@sgi.com, mbligh@aracnet.com,
akpm@osdl.org, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, simon.derr@bull.net,
frankeh@watson.ibm.com, hawkes@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [RFC PATCH] scheduler: Dynamic sched_domains
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 09:43:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410080943.21326.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41662EC8.4040308@yahoo.com.au>
On Thursday, October 7, 2004 11:08 pm, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Takayoshi Kochi wrote:
> > Yup, if SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN is set to 4, our 32-way TX-7 have
> > two disjoint domains ;(
> > (though the current default is 6 for ia64...)
> >
> > I think the default configuration of the scheduler domains should be
> > as identical to its real hardware topology as possible, and should
> > modify the default only when necessary (e.g. for Altix).
>
> That is the idea. Unfortunately the ia64 modifications are ia64 wide.
> I don't think it should be too hard to make it sn2 only.
The NEC and Altix machines both use a SLIT table to describe the machine
layout, so it should be possible to build them correctly w/o special case
code (I hope). The question is how big to make them, but if that's runtime
changeable, then no big deal. Like I said, the main thing missing from my
changes is a system wide domain, but I think John has some ideas about that.
Jesse
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-08 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-07 0:51 [RFC PATCH] scheduler: Dynamic sched_domains Matthew Dobson
2004-10-07 2:13 ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-07 17:01 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-08 5:55 ` [Lse-tech] " Takayoshi Kochi
2004-10-08 6:08 ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-08 16:43 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2004-10-07 21:58 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-08 0:22 ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-07 22:20 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-07 4:12 ` [ckrm-tech] " Marc E. Fiuczynski
2004-10-07 5:35 ` Paul Jackson
2004-10-07 22:06 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-07 9:32 ` Paul Jackson
2004-10-08 10:14 ` [Lse-tech] " Erich Focht
2004-10-08 10:40 ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-08 15:50 ` [ckrm-tech] " Hubertus Franke
2004-10-08 22:48 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-08 18:54 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-08 21:56 ` Peter Williams
2004-10-08 22:52 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-08 23:13 ` Erich Focht
2004-10-08 23:50 ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-10 12:25 ` Erich Focht
2004-10-08 22:51 ` Erich Focht
2004-10-09 1:05 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-10 12:45 ` Erich Focht
2004-10-12 22:45 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-08 18:45 ` Matthew Dobson
2005-04-18 20:26 ` [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-18 23:44 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-19 8:00 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-19 5:54 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19 6:19 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-19 6:59 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19 7:09 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-19 7:25 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19 7:28 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19 7:19 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19 7:57 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-19 20:34 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-23 23:26 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-26 0:52 ` Matthew Dobson
2005-04-26 0:59 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19 9:52 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-19 15:26 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-20 7:37 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-19 20:42 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19 8:12 ` Simon Derr
2005-04-19 16:19 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19 9:34 ` [Lse-tech] " Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-19 17:23 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-20 7:16 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-20 19:09 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-21 16:27 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-22 21:26 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-23 7:24 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-23 22:30 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-25 11:53 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-25 14:38 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-21 17:31 ` [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets (v0.2) Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-22 18:50 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-22 21:37 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-23 3:11 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200410080943.21326.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--to=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=frankeh@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=hawkes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=simon.derr@bull.net \
--cc=t-kochi@bq.jp.nec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).