linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: dino@in.ibm.com, Simon.Derr@bull.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
	akpm@osdl.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com, colpatch@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:25:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050419002512.557478d4.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1113894584.5074.54.camel@npiggin-nld.site>

> > So you do _not_ want to consider nested sched domains, just disjoint
> > ones.  Good.
> > 
> 
> You don't either? Good. :)

>From the point of view of cpusets, I'd rather not think
about nested sched domains, for now at least.

But my scheduler savvy colleagues on the big SGI boxes
may well have ambitions here.  I can't speak for them.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401

  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-19  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-07  0:51 [RFC PATCH] scheduler: Dynamic sched_domains Matthew Dobson
2004-10-07  2:13 ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-07 17:01   ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-08  5:55     ` [Lse-tech] " Takayoshi Kochi
2004-10-08  6:08       ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-08 16:43         ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-07 21:58   ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-08  0:22     ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-07 22:20   ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-07  4:12 ` [ckrm-tech] " Marc E. Fiuczynski
2004-10-07  5:35   ` Paul Jackson
2004-10-07 22:06   ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-07  9:32 ` Paul Jackson
2004-10-08 10:14 ` [Lse-tech] " Erich Focht
2004-10-08 10:40   ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-08 15:50     ` [ckrm-tech] " Hubertus Franke
2004-10-08 22:48       ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-08 18:54     ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-08 21:56       ` Peter Williams
2004-10-08 22:52         ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-08 23:13       ` Erich Focht
2004-10-08 23:50         ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-10 12:25           ` Erich Focht
2004-10-08 22:51     ` Erich Focht
2004-10-09  1:05       ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-10 12:45         ` Erich Focht
2004-10-12 22:45           ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-08 18:45   ` Matthew Dobson
2005-04-18 20:26 ` [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-18 23:44   ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-19  8:00     ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-19  5:54   ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19  6:19     ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-19  6:59       ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19  7:09         ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-19  7:25           ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2005-04-19  7:28           ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19  7:19       ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19  7:57         ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-19 20:34           ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-23 23:26             ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-26  0:52               ` Matthew Dobson
2005-04-26  0:59                 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19  9:52       ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-19 15:26         ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-20  7:37           ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-19 20:42         ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19  8:12     ` Simon Derr
2005-04-19 16:19       ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19  9:34     ` [Lse-tech] " Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-19 17:23       ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-20  7:16         ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-20 19:09           ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-21 16:27             ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-22 21:26               ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-23  7:24                 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-23 22:30               ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-25 11:53                 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-25 14:38                   ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-21 17:31   ` [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets (v0.2) Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-22 18:50     ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-22 21:37       ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-23  3:11     ` Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050419002512.557478d4.pj@sgi.com \
    --to=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=Simon.Derr@bull.net \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).