linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: ncunningham@linuxmail.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: Totally broken PCI PM calls
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:53:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041012085349.GA2292@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200410111437.17898.david-b@pacbell.net>

Hi!

> The machines I've tested with relatively generic 2.6.9-rc kernels
> don't use BIOS support for S4 when I call swsusp.
> 
> Of course the ACPI spec muddies the water by talking about two
> different states called "S4":  "S4 Sleeping", which is what I was
> talking about as G1/S4; and "S4 Non-Volatile Sleep" that's more
> what I've seen with swusp:  more like a G2 or G3 poweroff.
> 
> I'm willing to believe that there are systems on which swsusp
> tells drivers a less confusing story ... but I don't seem to have
> tested with those!

If you are entering S4 or S5 at the end of swsusp basically should not
matter to anyone. What we tell the drivers is same in both cases.

								Pavel
-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-10-12  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-11  0:45 Totally broken PCI PM calls Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-11  2:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-11  3:42   ` Paul Mackerras
2004-10-11  4:04     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-11  4:24       ` Paul Mackerras
2004-10-11  9:57         ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-11 14:42         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-11 14:56           ` suspend-to-RAM [was Re: Totally broken PCI PM calls] Pavel Machek
2004-10-11 15:30             ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-11 17:39               ` Olivier Galibert
2004-10-11 18:21                 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-11 15:53             ` Brice Goglin
2004-10-11 16:17               ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-11 17:09                 ` Brice Goglin
2004-10-11 18:23                   ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-11 18:40                     ` Brice Goglin
2004-10-11 16:47         ` Totally broken PCI PM calls David Brownell
2004-10-11 22:28           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-11 22:58             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-10-11 23:08               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-12  3:00                 ` David Brownell
2004-10-12  4:09                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-10-12 16:56                     ` David Brownell
2004-10-12  9:27             ` Russell King
2004-10-12 11:24               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-11  4:25     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-11 10:18       ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-11 10:54         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-11 16:01         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-15 13:59           ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-15 15:56             ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-24 20:58               ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-24 21:18                 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-11 16:36     ` David Brownell
2004-10-11 21:17       ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-10-11 21:37         ` David Brownell
2004-10-11 22:12           ` Stefan Seyfried
2004-10-12  2:59             ` David Brownell
2004-10-12  8:54               ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-12 10:32                 ` Stefan Seyfried
2004-10-12 18:28                 ` David Brownell
2004-10-12 20:28                   ` Stefan Seyfried
2004-10-13 13:34                     ` David Brownell
2004-10-12  1:24           ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-10-12  8:53           ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2004-10-12 18:52             ` David Brownell
2004-10-12 19:50               ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-12 22:13               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-12 22:35                 ` David Brownell
2004-10-11 22:26       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-11  3:45   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-11  4:08     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-11  4:23       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-11  4:32         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-11  4:55           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-11 16:15             ` David Brownell
2004-10-11 22:22               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-12  2:46                 ` David Brownell
2004-10-12  4:02                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-12 10:49                     ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-10-12 11:27                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-12 11:38                         ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-10-12 11:51               ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-11 10:08     ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-11  9:51 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041012085349.GA2292@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).