* [PATCH] uninline __sigqueue_alloc
@ 2004-10-22 21:35 Chris Wright
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Chris Wright @ 2004-10-22 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: torvalds; +Cc: linux-kernel
Christoph suggests letting the compiler choose. No real compelling reason
to inline anyhow. I had some vmlinux size numbers suggesting inline was
better, but re-running them on newer kernel is giving different results,
favoring uninline. Best let compiler choose. Un-inline __sigqueue_alloc.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
===== kernel/signal.c 1.140 vs edited =====
--- 1.140/kernel/signal.c 2004-10-21 13:46:54 -07:00
+++ edited/kernel/signal.c 2004-10-22 14:00:00 -07:00
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@
return sig;
}
-static inline struct sigqueue *__sigqueue_alloc(struct task_struct *t, int flags)
+static struct sigqueue *__sigqueue_alloc(struct task_struct *t, int flags)
{
struct sigqueue *q = NULL;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-10-22 21:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-10-22 21:35 [PATCH] uninline __sigqueue_alloc Chris Wright
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).