From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourcefoge.net.kroah.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, laforge@gnumonks.org
Subject: Re: My vision of usbmon
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:04:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041222050424.GB31076@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1103679534.5055.2.camel@npiggin-nld.site>
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 12:38:54PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 16:57 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 11:04:54PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > > Hi, Guys:
> > >
> > > This is usbmon which I cooked up because I got tired from adding dbg()'s
> > > and polluting my dmesg. I use it to hunt bugs in USB storage devices so
> > > far, and it's useful, although limited at this stage.
> > >
> > > I looked at the Harding's USBmon patch, and I think he got a few things right.
> > > The main of them is that I underestimated the benefits of placing the special
> > > files into the filesystem namespace. When we discussed it with Greg in the
> > > airport, we decided that having some sort of Netlink-style socket would be
> > > the best option. I decided to make a u-turn and attach those sockets into
> > > the namespace (currently under /dbg, but it can change). What this buys us is:
> > >
>
> Is there any reason why these debug filesystems are going under the
> root directory? Why not /sys/debug or /sys/kernel/debug or something?
See the previous thread as to where to mount debugfs. In short, I don't
really care :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-22 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-20 7:04 My vision of usbmon Pete Zaitcev
[not found] ` <200412201255.59120.oliver@neukum.org>
2004-12-20 12:21 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Pete Zaitcev
2004-12-22 0:57 ` Greg KH
2004-12-22 1:29 ` Pete Zaitcev
2004-12-22 5:06 ` Greg KH
2004-12-22 5:10 ` Greg KH
2004-12-22 1:38 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-22 5:04 ` Greg KH [this message]
2004-12-22 5:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-12-22 6:43 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <200412201525.52149.oliver@neukum.org>
2004-12-22 2:25 ` Pete Zaitcev
2004-12-22 5:03 ` Greg KH
2004-12-22 20:46 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-12-23 21:02 Chad Kitching
2005-01-11 1:36 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041222050424.GB31076@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourcefoge.net.kroah.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).