* [2.6 patch] net/netlink/af_netlink.c: possible cleanups
@ 2004-12-15 0:46 Adrian Bunk
2004-12-15 14:07 ` jamal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2004-12-15 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox, Alexey Kuznetsov; +Cc: netdev, linux-kernel
The patch below contains the following possible cleanups:
- make the needlessly global function netlink_getsockbypid static
- remove the EXPORT_SYMBOL'ed but unused functions netlink_attach and
netlink_detach
Please review whether these changes are correct or whether they conflict
with pending patches.
diffstat output:
include/linux/netlink.h | 3 ---
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 28 +---------------------------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 30 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
--- linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/include/linux/netlink.h.old 2004-12-14 21:43:16.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/include/linux/netlink.h 2004-12-14 21:44:27.000000000 +0100
@@ -116,8 +116,6 @@
#define NETLINK_CREDS(skb) (&NETLINK_CB((skb)).creds)
-extern int netlink_attach(int unit, int (*function)(int,struct sk_buff *skb));
-extern void netlink_detach(int unit);
extern int netlink_post(int unit, struct sk_buff *skb);
extern struct sock *netlink_kernel_create(int unit, void (*input)(struct sock *sk, int len));
extern void netlink_ack(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, int err);
@@ -129,7 +127,6 @@
extern int netlink_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
/* finegrained unicast helpers: */
-struct sock *netlink_getsockbypid(struct sock *ssk, u32 pid);
struct sock *netlink_getsockbyfilp(struct file *filp);
int netlink_attachskb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int nonblock, long timeo);
void netlink_detachskb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
--- linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/net/netlink/af_netlink.c.old 2004-12-14 21:43:31.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/net/netlink/af_netlink.c 2004-12-14 21:44:34.000000000 +0100
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@
}
}
-struct sock *netlink_getsockbypid(struct sock *ssk, u32 pid)
+static struct sock *netlink_getsockbypid(struct sock *ssk, u32 pid)
{
int protocol = ssk->sk_protocol;
struct sock *sock;
@@ -1210,30 +1210,6 @@
* Backward compatibility.
*/
-int netlink_attach(int unit, int (*function)(int, struct sk_buff *skb))
-{
- struct sock *sk = netlink_kernel_create(unit, NULL);
- if (sk == NULL)
- return -ENOBUFS;
- nlk_sk(sk)->handler = function;
- write_lock_bh(&nl_emu_lock);
- netlink_kernel[unit] = sk->sk_socket;
- write_unlock_bh(&nl_emu_lock);
- return 0;
-}
-
-void netlink_detach(int unit)
-{
- struct socket *sock;
-
- write_lock_bh(&nl_emu_lock);
- sock = netlink_kernel[unit];
- netlink_kernel[unit] = NULL;
- write_unlock_bh(&nl_emu_lock);
-
- sock_release(sock);
-}
-
int netlink_post(int unit, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct socket *sock;
@@ -1522,7 +1498,5 @@
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_unregister_notifier);
#if defined(CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV) || defined(CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV_MODULE)
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_attach);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_detach);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_post);
#endif
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [2.6 patch] net/netlink/af_netlink.c: possible cleanups
2004-12-15 0:46 [2.6 patch] net/netlink/af_netlink.c: possible cleanups Adrian Bunk
@ 2004-12-15 14:07 ` jamal
2004-12-28 3:08 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: jamal @ 2004-12-15 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: Alan Cox, Alexey Kuznetsov, netdev, linux-kernel
I think this should be left alone for now; what we need to do is
deprecate NETLINK_DEV incase someone is still using it.
Else we could get rid of it totaly including what Adrian is deleting
below. Any users of NETLINK_DEV? Maybe deleting the feature will get
someone whining? ;->
cheers,
jamal
On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 19:46, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The patch below contains the following possible cleanups:
> - make the needlessly global function netlink_getsockbypid static
> - remove the EXPORT_SYMBOL'ed but unused functions netlink_attach and
> netlink_detach
>
> Please review whether these changes are correct or whether they conflict
> with pending patches.
>
>
> diffstat output:
> include/linux/netlink.h | 3 ---
> net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 28 +---------------------------
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
>
> --- linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/include/linux/netlink.h.old 2004-12-14 21:43:16.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/include/linux/netlink.h 2004-12-14 21:44:27.000000000 +0100
> @@ -116,8 +116,6 @@
> #define NETLINK_CREDS(skb) (&NETLINK_CB((skb)).creds)
>
>
> -extern int netlink_attach(int unit, int (*function)(int,struct sk_buff *skb));
> -extern void netlink_detach(int unit);
> extern int netlink_post(int unit, struct sk_buff *skb);
> extern struct sock *netlink_kernel_create(int unit, void (*input)(struct sock *sk, int len));
> extern void netlink_ack(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, int err);
> @@ -129,7 +127,6 @@
> extern int netlink_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
>
> /* finegrained unicast helpers: */
> -struct sock *netlink_getsockbypid(struct sock *ssk, u32 pid);
> struct sock *netlink_getsockbyfilp(struct file *filp);
> int netlink_attachskb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int nonblock, long timeo);
> void netlink_detachskb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
> --- linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/net/netlink/af_netlink.c.old 2004-12-14 21:43:31.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/net/netlink/af_netlink.c 2004-12-14 21:44:34.000000000 +0100
> @@ -546,7 +546,7 @@
> }
> }
>
> -struct sock *netlink_getsockbypid(struct sock *ssk, u32 pid)
> +static struct sock *netlink_getsockbypid(struct sock *ssk, u32 pid)
> {
> int protocol = ssk->sk_protocol;
> struct sock *sock;
> @@ -1210,30 +1210,6 @@
> * Backward compatibility.
> */
>
> -int netlink_attach(int unit, int (*function)(int, struct sk_buff *skb))
> -{
> - struct sock *sk = netlink_kernel_create(unit, NULL);
> - if (sk == NULL)
> - return -ENOBUFS;
> - nlk_sk(sk)->handler = function;
> - write_lock_bh(&nl_emu_lock);
> - netlink_kernel[unit] = sk->sk_socket;
> - write_unlock_bh(&nl_emu_lock);
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -void netlink_detach(int unit)
> -{
> - struct socket *sock;
> -
> - write_lock_bh(&nl_emu_lock);
> - sock = netlink_kernel[unit];
> - netlink_kernel[unit] = NULL;
> - write_unlock_bh(&nl_emu_lock);
> -
> - sock_release(sock);
> -}
> -
> int netlink_post(int unit, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct socket *sock;
> @@ -1522,7 +1498,5 @@
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_unregister_notifier);
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV) || defined(CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV_MODULE)
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_attach);
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_detach);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_post);
> #endif
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [2.6 patch] net/netlink/af_netlink.c: possible cleanups
2004-12-15 14:07 ` jamal
@ 2004-12-28 3:08 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2004-12-28 3:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hadi; +Cc: bunk, alan, kuznet, netdev, linux-kernel
On 15 Dec 2004 09:07:03 -0500
jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> wrote:
> I think this should be left alone for now; what we need to do is
> deprecate NETLINK_DEV incase someone is still using it.
> Else we could get rid of it totaly including what Adrian is deleting
> below. Any users of NETLINK_DEV? Maybe deleting the feature will get
> someone whining? ;->
While I agree we should probably just kill NETLINK_DEV now
and don't look back, I have applied Adrian's patch for
the time being.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-28 3:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-15 0:46 [2.6 patch] net/netlink/af_netlink.c: possible cleanups Adrian Bunk
2004-12-15 14:07 ` jamal
2004-12-28 3:08 ` David S. Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).