linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] stricter type-checking rwlock primitives, x86
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:18:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050120121813.GA4838@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050120120905.GA3493@elte.hu>


turn x86 rwlock macros into inline functions, to get stricter
type-checking. Test-built/booted on x86. (patch comes after all
previous spinlock patches.)

	Ingo

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

--- linux/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h.orig
+++ linux/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h
@@ -198,21 +198,33 @@ typedef struct {
 
 #define RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED (rwlock_t) { RW_LOCK_BIAS RWLOCK_MAGIC_INIT }
 
-#define rwlock_init(x)	do { *(x) = RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED; } while(0)
+static inline void rwlock_init(rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	*rw = RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
+}
 
-#define rwlock_is_locked(x) ((x)->lock != RW_LOCK_BIAS)
+static inline int rwlock_is_locked(rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	return rw->lock != RW_LOCK_BIAS;
+}
 
 /**
  * read_trylock_test - would read_trylock() succeed?
  * @lock: the rwlock in question.
  */
-#define read_trylock_test(x) (atomic_read((atomic_t *)&(x)->lock) > 0)
+static inline int read_trylock_test(rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	return atomic_read((atomic_t *)&rw->lock) > 0;
+}
 
 /**
  * write_trylock_test - would write_trylock() succeed?
  * @lock: the rwlock in question.
  */
-#define write_trylock_test(x) ((x)->lock == RW_LOCK_BIAS)
+static inline int write_trylock_test(rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	return atomic_read((atomic_t *)&rw->lock) == RW_LOCK_BIAS;
+}
 
 /*
  * On x86, we implement read-write locks as a 32-bit counter
@@ -241,8 +253,16 @@ static inline void _raw_write_lock(rwloc
 	__build_write_lock(rw, "__write_lock_failed");
 }
 
-#define _raw_read_unlock(rw)		asm volatile("lock ; incl %0" :"=m" ((rw)->lock) : : "memory")
-#define _raw_write_unlock(rw)	asm volatile("lock ; addl $" RW_LOCK_BIAS_STR ",%0":"=m" ((rw)->lock) : : "memory")
+static inline void _raw_read_unlock(rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	asm volatile("lock ; incl %0" :"=m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
+}
+
+static inline void _raw_write_unlock(rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	asm volatile("lock ; addl $" RW_LOCK_BIAS_STR
+				",%0":"=m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
+}
 
 static inline int _raw_read_trylock(rwlock_t *lock)
 {

  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-20 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-20 11:43 [patch 1/3] spinlock fix #1 Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 11:59 ` [patch 2/3] spinlock fix #2: generalize [spin|rw]lock yielding Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 12:09   ` [patch 3/3] spinlock fix #3: type-checking spinlock primitives, x86 Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 12:18     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-01-20 12:22       ` [patch] minor spinlock cleanups Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 22:51     ` [patch 3/3] spinlock fix #3: type-checking spinlock primitives, x86 J.A. Magallon
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-19  9:20 Horrible regression with -CURRENT from "Don't busy-lock-loop in preemptable spinlocks" patch Ingo Molnar
2005-01-19 21:43 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-01-20  2:34   ` [PATCH RFC] 'spinlock/rwlock fixes' V3 [1/1] Chris Wedgwood
2005-01-20  3:01     ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-20  3:18       ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-01-20  8:59         ` Peter Chubb
2005-01-20 15:51           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-20 16:08             ` [patch 1/3] spinlock fix #1, *_can_lock() primitives Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 16:11               ` [patch 2/3] spinlock fix #2: generalize [spin|rw]lock yielding Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 16:12                 ` [patch 3/3] spinlock fix #3: type-checking spinlock primitives, x86 Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 16:14                   ` [patch] stricter type-checking rwlock " Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050120121813.GA4838@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).