linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	"Sergey S. Kostyliov" <rathamahata@ehouse.ru>,
	Clem Taylor <clem.taylor@gmail.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:27:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050414182712.GG493@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050414181133.GA18221@wotan.suse.de>

* Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de) wrote:
> > I will take a closer look at the rc1/rc2 patches later this evening
> > and see if I can spot something. Can only report back tomorrow though.
> 
> Actually itt started in .11 already - sigh - on rereading the thread.
> That will make the code audit harder :/

Yes, I've seen it in .11 and earlier kernels.  Happen to have same
"x86_64" string on my bad pmd dumps, but can't reproduce it at all.
So, for now, I can hold off on adding the reload cr3 patch to -stable
unless you think it should be there anyway.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net

  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-14 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-30 21:44 x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 Dave Jones
2005-03-31 10:41 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-31 21:52   ` Dave Jones
2005-04-01 11:52     ` Sergey S. Kostyliov
2005-04-07  2:49   ` Dave Jones
2005-04-07  6:29     ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-14 13:54       ` Hugh Dickins
2005-04-14 17:01         ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-14 17:34           ` Hugh Dickins
2005-04-14 18:10             ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-14 18:11               ` x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II Andi Kleen
2005-04-14 18:27                 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2005-04-15 17:24                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-15 17:28                     ` Chris Wright
2005-04-15 17:58                       ` Hugh Dickins
2005-04-15 18:07                         ` Dave Jones
2005-04-22 17:37                           ` Debugging patch was " Andi Kleen
2005-04-27 14:23                           ` New debugging " Andi Kleen
2005-04-27 17:37                             ` Dave Jones
2005-04-29 11:07                               ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2005-04-19 13:35                         ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-19 15:52                           ` Hugh Dickins
2005-04-29 11:12                             ` Christopher Warner
2005-04-29 16:13                               ` Chris Wright
2005-04-29 17:32                               ` Dave Jones
2005-05-02 17:00                                 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-02 15:28                                   ` Christopher Warner
2005-05-02 20:33                                     ` Chris Wright
2005-05-02 21:08                                       ` Dave Jones
2005-05-03 14:28                                         ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-03 15:15                                           ` Dave Jones
2005-05-10  9:36                                     ` Christopher Warner
2005-05-10 16:26                                       ` Chris Wright
2005-05-10 12:03                                         ` Christopher Warner
2005-05-10 16:38                                       ` Dave Jones
2005-05-10 16:46                                         ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-10 16:59                                           ` Dave Jones
2005-05-10 20:32                                             ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-10 20:43                                               ` Chris Wright
2005-05-12 21:23                                             ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-13 21:51                                               ` Peter J. Stieber
2005-05-14 17:29                                                 ` Peter J. Stieber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050414182712.GG493@shell0.pdx.osdl.net \
    --to=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=clem.taylor@gmail.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rathamahata@ehouse.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).