From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
uclinux-v850@lsi.nec.co.jp
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] include/linux/irq.h: #include <linux/smp.h>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:11:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051221221114.GA3917@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051221214806.GJ1736@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 09:48:06PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:33:21PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:04:22AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 02:41:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > Yes, it's basically always wrong to include asm/foo.h when linux/foo.h
> > > > exists.
> > >
> > > There's always an exception to every rule. linux/irq.h is that
> > > exception for the above rule.
> >
> > Why?
>
> /*
> * Please do not include this file in generic code. There is currently
> * no requirement for any architecture to implement anything held
> * within this file.
> *
> * Thanks. --rmk
> */
>
> Using linux/irq.h instead of asm/irq.h _breaks_ architectures
> which do not use the generic irq code.
>
> Basically, linux/irq.h should have been called asm-generic/irq.h.
I'm not getting your point.
The patch we are discussing is:
--- linux-2.6.15-rc6/include/linux/irq.h.old 2005-12-20 21:45:57.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.15-rc6/include/linux/irq.h 2005-12-20 21:46:08.000000000 +0100
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/config.h>
-#include <asm/smp.h> /* cpu_online_map */
+#include <linux/smp.h>
> Russell King
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-21 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-21 1:27 [RFC: 2.6 patch] include/linux/irq.h: #include <linux/smp.h> Adrian Bunk
2005-12-21 10:41 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-21 11:04 ` Russell King
2005-12-21 21:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-21 21:48 ` Russell King
2005-12-21 22:11 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-12-21 22:21 ` Russell King
2005-12-21 22:33 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051221221114.GA3917@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=uclinux-v850@lsi.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).