From: Bernd Eckenfels <be-mail2006@lina.inka.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Grant Coady <gcoady@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why is 2.4.32 four times faster than 2.6.14.6??
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 09:00:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060108080048.GA32737@lina.inka.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <irf1s1hdoqbsf9cin627gh9tgrsb51htoe@4ax.com>
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:42:25PM +1100, Grant Coady wrote:
> Excuse me? there is no 5 minutes wait time ;)
sure there is, you see the real time is 6mins vs 1min. since user and system
time are nearly the same, the delay is introduced by sleeping io. And if it
is not the disk, it is the terminal, as proofen by the redirection.
No the question is, if this is in the pty or tcp/networkstack code.
Gruss
Bernd
--
(OO) -- Bernd_Eckenfels@Mörscher_Strasse_8.76185Karlsruhe.de --
( .. ) ecki@{inka.de,linux.de,debian.org} http://www.eckes.org/
o--o 1024D/E383CD7E eckes@IRCNet v:+497211603874 f:+49721151516129
(O____O) When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-08 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-08 6:16 Why is 2.4.32 four times faster than 2.6.14.6?? Grant Coady
2006-01-08 6:58 ` Markus Rechberger
2006-01-08 7:18 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-01-08 7:42 ` Grant Coady
2006-01-08 8:00 ` Bernd Eckenfels [this message]
2006-01-08 8:11 ` Con Kolivas
2006-01-08 9:12 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-01-08 12:04 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-08 19:20 ` Grant Coady
2006-02-22 19:27 ` Enrico Weigelt
2006-02-22 23:17 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-08 7:28 ` Grant Coady
2006-01-08 9:57 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-01-08 10:23 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-01-08 10:54 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-01-08 11:09 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-01-08 11:16 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-01-08 11:18 ` Grant Coady
2006-01-09 2:37 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-01-09 2:46 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 2:59 ` Grant Coady
2006-01-09 6:56 ` Grant Coady
2006-01-08 11:05 ` Grant Coady
2006-01-08 18:21 ` Octavio Alvarez Piza
2006-01-08 19:27 ` Grant Coady
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060108080048.GA32737@lina.inka.de \
--to=be-mail2006@lina.inka.de \
--cc=gcoady@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).