From: Grant Coady <gcoady@gmail.com>
To: Markus Rechberger <mrechberger@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why is 2.4.32 four times faster than 2.6.14.6??
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:28:53 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <gre1s1lkr687o2npgom26gqq3etgjdjgpo@4ax.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9def9db0601072258v39ac4334kccc843838b436bba@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 07:58:09 +0100, Markus Rechberger <mrechberger@gmail.com> wrote:
>Were there any other processes running during the test?
box runs same config both kernels: the usual light load ~100% idle ;)
>what does "vmstat 1" show up during the test?
grant@deltree:~$ uname -r
2.6.14.6a
grant@deltree:~$ vmstat 1
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
[...]
0 0 0 63800 11520 32352 0 0 0 0 110 18 0 0 100 0
0 0 0 63800 11520 32352 0 0 0 0 106 17 1 0 99 0
3 0 0 63560 11520 32352 0 0 0 0 346 502 22 9 69 0
1 0 0 63560 11520 32352 0 0 0 0 1057 1987 59 41 0 0
1 0 0 63560 11520 32352 0 0 0 0 1062 2011 59 41 0 0
1 0 0 63560 11520 32352 0 0 0 0 1053 2001 50 50 0 0
1 0 0 63500 11596 32352 0 0 0 136 1054 1974 61 39 0 0
1 0 0 63500 11596 32352 0 0 0 0 1040 1978 50 50 0 0
0 0 0 63620 11596 32352 0 0 0 0 799 1425 45 27 29 0
0 0 0 63620 11596 32352 0 0 0 0 104 12 0 0 100 0
0 0 0 63620 11596 32352 0 0 0 0 103 10 0 0 100 0
grant@deltree:~$ uname -r
2.4.32-hf32.1
grant@deltree:~$ vmstat 1
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
[...]
0 0 0 83192 6532 21404 0 0 0 0 104 12 0 1 99 0
0 0 0 83152 6572 21404 0 0 0 80 116 24 0 1 99 0
1 0 0 82952 6572 21404 0 0 0 0 168 130 6 5 89 0
2 0 0 82952 6572 21404 0 0 0 0 667 1019 65 35 0 0
0 0 0 83152 6572 21404 0 0 0 0 297 378 41 10 49 0
0 0 0 83152 6572 21404 0 0 0 0 104 9 0 1 99 0
0 0 0 83064 6656 21404 0 0 0 304 169 121 0 1 99 0
0 0 0 83064 6656 21404 0 0 0 0 137 42 0 2 98 0
--
Thanks,
Grant.
http://bugsplatter.mine.nu/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-08 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-08 6:16 Why is 2.4.32 four times faster than 2.6.14.6?? Grant Coady
2006-01-08 6:58 ` Markus Rechberger
2006-01-08 7:18 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-01-08 7:42 ` Grant Coady
2006-01-08 8:00 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-01-08 8:11 ` Con Kolivas
2006-01-08 9:12 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-01-08 12:04 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-08 19:20 ` Grant Coady
2006-02-22 19:27 ` Enrico Weigelt
2006-02-22 23:17 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-08 7:28 ` Grant Coady [this message]
2006-01-08 9:57 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-01-08 10:23 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-01-08 10:54 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-01-08 11:09 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-01-08 11:16 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-01-08 11:18 ` Grant Coady
2006-01-09 2:37 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-01-09 2:46 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 2:59 ` Grant Coady
2006-01-09 6:56 ` Grant Coady
2006-01-08 11:05 ` Grant Coady
2006-01-08 18:21 ` Octavio Alvarez Piza
2006-01-08 19:27 ` Grant Coady
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=gre1s1lkr687o2npgom26gqq3etgjdjgpo@4ax.com \
--to=gcoady@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mrechberger@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).