hald in status D with 2.6.16-rc4

hald in status D with 2.6.16-rc4

[Hesse, Christian]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 261 bytes --]

Hello everybody,

since using kernel version 2.6.16-rc4 the hal daemon is in status D after 
resume. I use suspend2 2.2.0.1 for 2.6.16-rc3. Any hints what could be the 
problem? It worked perfectly with 2.6.15.x and suspend2 2.2.
-- 
Regards,
Christian

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]

Re: hald in status D with 2.6.16-rc4

[Andrew Morton]

"Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
> 
> since using kernel version 2.6.16-rc4 the hal daemon is in status D after 
> resume. I use suspend2 2.2.0.1 for 2.6.16-rc3. Any hints what could be the 
> problem? It worked perfectly with 2.6.15.x and suspend2 2.2.

a) Look in the logs for any oopses, other nasties

b) Do `echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger', `dmesg -s 1000000 > foo' then find
   the trace for `hald' in `foo', send it to this list.

Thanks.

Re: hald in status D with 2.6.16-rc4

[Hesse, Christian]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2224 bytes --]

On Tuesday 21 February 2006 06:19, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > since using kernel version 2.6.16-rc4 the hal daemon is in status D after
> > resume. I use suspend2 2.2.0.1 for 2.6.16-rc3. Any hints what could be
> > the problem? It worked perfectly with 2.6.15.x and suspend2 2.2.
>
> a) Look in the logs for any oopses, other nasties

Nothing.

> b) Do `echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger', `dmesg -s 1000000 > foo' then find
>    the trace for `hald' in `foo', send it to this list.

Ok, here it is:

hald          D E0B50480     0  7791      1  7797   10654  7609 (NOTLB)
cc6cbccc e0b50480 000f4428 e0b50480 000f4428 c6c9605c c14dce00 c14dce00
       e0b50480 000f4428 cc3df530 dff6e5c0 cc3df530 00000296 dff6e5c8 c046f202
       00000001 cc3df530 c0115680 d7ea1ce0 dff6e5c8 00000003 00000001 00000000
Call Trace:
 [<c046f202>] __down+0x62/0xc0
 [<c0115680>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [<c046dd3f>] __down_failed+0x7/0xc
 [<c0288bbf>] .text.lock.osl+0x13/0x3c
 [<c0292678>] acpi_ex_system_wait_semaphore+0x34/0x48
 [<c028d5da>] acpi_ev_acquire_global_lock+0x67/0x6c
 [<c0293fdc>] acpi_ex_acquire_global_lock+0x14/0x3b
 [<c028f578>] acpi_ex_read_data_from_field+0x114/0x14b
 [<c029475b>] acpi_ex_resolve_node_to_value+0x123/0x1ac
 [<c028fdc2>] acpi_ex_resolve_to_value+0x5e/0x69
 [<c02923df>] acpi_ex_resolve_operands+0x277/0x4dc
 [<c028a4fd>] acpi_ds_exec_end_op+0xab/0x36e
 [<c0298fe6>] acpi_ps_parse_loop+0x5ba/0x8bc
 [<c0298881>] acpi_ps_parse_aml+0x4e/0x1f9
 [<c02998fb>] acpi_ps_execute_pass+0x72/0x83
 [<c0299824>] acpi_ps_execute_method+0x54/0x7d
 [<c0296c5f>] acpi_ns_execute_control_method+0x5a/0x67
 [<c0296bee>] acpi_ns_evaluate_by_handle+0x73/0x8a
 [<c0296aee>] acpi_ns_evaluate_relative+0xaa/0xc6
 [<c0296375>] acpi_evaluate_object+0x139/0x1fb
 [<c024e2e2>] copy_to_user+0x42/0x60
 [<c02a0107>] acpi_battery_get_status+0x6b/0x11c
 [<c02a056b>] acpi_battery_read_state+0x52/0x185
 [<c01832d8>] seq_read+0xe8/0x2f0
 [<c0162dba>] vfs_read+0xaa/0x1a0
 [<c01631d1>] sys_read+0x51/0x80
 [<c0102b5f>] sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75

This is with 2.6.16-rc4-git1 + suspend2 2.2.0.1.
-- 
Christian

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]

Re: hald in status D with 2.6.16-rc4

[Andrew Morton]

"Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 21 February 2006 06:19, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
> > > Hello everybody,
> > >
> > > since using kernel version 2.6.16-rc4 the hal daemon is in status D after
> > > resume. I use suspend2 2.2.0.1 for 2.6.16-rc3. Any hints what could be
> > > the problem? It worked perfectly with 2.6.15.x and suspend2 2.2.
> >
> > a) Look in the logs for any oopses, other nasties
> 
> Nothing.
> 
> > b) Do `echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger', `dmesg -s 1000000 > foo' then find
> >    the trace for `hald' in `foo', send it to this list.
> 
> Ok, here it is:
> 
> hald          D E0B50480     0  7791      1  7797   10654  7609 (NOTLB)
> cc6cbccc e0b50480 000f4428 e0b50480 000f4428 c6c9605c c14dce00 c14dce00
>        e0b50480 000f4428 cc3df530 dff6e5c0 cc3df530 00000296 dff6e5c8 c046f202
>        00000001 cc3df530 c0115680 d7ea1ce0 dff6e5c8 00000003 00000001 00000000
> Call Trace:
>  [<c046f202>] __down+0x62/0xc0
>  [<c0115680>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
>  [<c046dd3f>] __down_failed+0x7/0xc
>  [<c0288bbf>] .text.lock.osl+0x13/0x3c
>  [<c0292678>] acpi_ex_system_wait_semaphore+0x34/0x48
>  [<c028d5da>] acpi_ev_acquire_global_lock+0x67/0x6c
>  [<c0293fdc>] acpi_ex_acquire_global_lock+0x14/0x3b
>  [<c028f578>] acpi_ex_read_data_from_field+0x114/0x14b
>  [<c029475b>] acpi_ex_resolve_node_to_value+0x123/0x1ac
>  [<c028fdc2>] acpi_ex_resolve_to_value+0x5e/0x69
>  [<c02923df>] acpi_ex_resolve_operands+0x277/0x4dc
>  [<c028a4fd>] acpi_ds_exec_end_op+0xab/0x36e
>  [<c0298fe6>] acpi_ps_parse_loop+0x5ba/0x8bc
>  [<c0298881>] acpi_ps_parse_aml+0x4e/0x1f9
>  [<c02998fb>] acpi_ps_execute_pass+0x72/0x83
>  [<c0299824>] acpi_ps_execute_method+0x54/0x7d
>  [<c0296c5f>] acpi_ns_execute_control_method+0x5a/0x67
>  [<c0296bee>] acpi_ns_evaluate_by_handle+0x73/0x8a
>  [<c0296aee>] acpi_ns_evaluate_relative+0xaa/0xc6
>  [<c0296375>] acpi_evaluate_object+0x139/0x1fb
>  [<c024e2e2>] copy_to_user+0x42/0x60
>  [<c02a0107>] acpi_battery_get_status+0x6b/0x11c
>  [<c02a056b>] acpi_battery_read_state+0x52/0x185
>  [<c01832d8>] seq_read+0xe8/0x2f0
>  [<c0162dba>] vfs_read+0xaa/0x1a0
>  [<c01631d1>] sys_read+0x51/0x80
>  [<c0102b5f>] sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75
> 
> This is with 2.6.16-rc4-git1 + suspend2 2.2.0.1.

Hopefully suspend2 isn't involved.  People would feel more comfortable if
you could test a vanilla mainline tree..

Could the ACPI team please take a look at fixing this regression?

Re: hald in status D with 2.6.16-rc4

[Hesse, Christian]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1159 bytes --]

On Tuesday 21 February 2006 23:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 06:19, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
> > > > Hello everybody,
> > > >
> > > > since using kernel version 2.6.16-rc4 the hal daemon is in status D
> > > > after resume. I use suspend2 2.2.0.1 for 2.6.16-rc3. Any hints what
> > > > could be the problem? It worked perfectly with 2.6.15.x and suspend2
> > > > 2.2.
> > >
> > > a) Look in the logs for any oopses, other nasties
> >
> > Nothing.
> >
> > > b) Do `echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger', `dmesg -s 1000000 > foo' then
> > > find the trace for `hald' in `foo', send it to this list.
> >
> > Ok, here it is:
> >
> > [ trace snipped ]
> >
> > This is with 2.6.16-rc4-git1 + suspend2 2.2.0.1.
>
> Hopefully suspend2 isn't involved.  People would feel more comfortable if
> you could test a vanilla mainline tree..
>
> Could the ACPI team please take a look at fixing this regression?

I did two cycles with mainline suspend now and did not hit the problem... I 
will keep an eye on it.
-- 
Christian

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]

Re: hald in status D with 2.6.16-rc4

[Nigel Cunningham]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1481 bytes --]

Hi.

On Wednesday 22 February 2006 20:10, Hesse, Christian wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 February 2006 23:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 06:19, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
> > > > > Hello everybody,
> > > > >
> > > > > since using kernel version 2.6.16-rc4 the hal daemon is in status D
> > > > > after resume. I use suspend2 2.2.0.1 for 2.6.16-rc3. Any hints what
> > > > > could be the problem? It worked perfectly with 2.6.15.x and
> > > > > suspend2 2.2.
> > > >
> > > > a) Look in the logs for any oopses, other nasties
> > >
> > > Nothing.
> > >
> > > > b) Do `echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger', `dmesg -s 1000000 > foo' then
> > > > find the trace for `hald' in `foo', send it to this list.
> > >
> > > Ok, here it is:
> > >
> > > [ trace snipped ]
> > >
> > > This is with 2.6.16-rc4-git1 + suspend2 2.2.0.1.
> >
> > Hopefully suspend2 isn't involved.  People would feel more comfortable if
> > you could test a vanilla mainline tree..
> >
> > Could the ACPI team please take a look at fixing this regression?
>
> I did two cycles with mainline suspend now and did not hit the problem... I
> will keep an eye on it.

Could you let me know how you go? I didn't make any changes between 2.2 and 
2.2.0.1 that I think could cause this, but if you can't reproduce it 
otherwise, I'll happily look again.

Regards,

Nigel

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: hald in status D with 2.6.16-rc4

[Hesse, Christian]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1368 bytes --]

On Wednesday 22 February 2006 11:10, Hesse, Christian wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 February 2006 23:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 06:19, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
> > > > > Hello everybody,
> > > > >
> > > > > since using kernel version 2.6.16-rc4 the hal daemon is in status D
> > > > > after resume. I use suspend2 2.2.0.1 for 2.6.16-rc3. Any hints what
> > > > > could be the problem? It worked perfectly with 2.6.15.x and
> > > > > suspend2 2.2.
> > > >
> > > > a) Look in the logs for any oopses, other nasties
> > >
> > > Nothing.
> > >
> > > > b) Do `echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger', `dmesg -s 1000000 > foo' then
> > > > find the trace for `hald' in `foo', send it to this list.
> > >
> > > Ok, here it is:
> > >
> > > [ trace snipped ]
> > >
> > > This is with 2.6.16-rc4-git1 + suspend2 2.2.0.1.
> >
> > Hopefully suspend2 isn't involved.  People would feel more comfortable if
> > you could test a vanilla mainline tree..
> >
> > Could the ACPI team please take a look at fixing this regression?
>
> I did two cycles with mainline suspend now and did not hit the problem... I
> will keep an eye on it.

It is independent from suspend version, hald hangs with mainline suspend as 
well.
-- 
Christian

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]

Re: hald in status D with 2.6.16-rc4

[Hesse, Christian]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1736 bytes --]

On Wednesday 22 February 2006 12:09, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.

Hi Nigel,

> On Wednesday 22 February 2006 20:10, Hesse, Christian wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 23:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 06:19, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
> > > > > > Hello everybody,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > since using kernel version 2.6.16-rc4 the hal daemon is in status
> > > > > > D after resume. I use suspend2 2.2.0.1 for 2.6.16-rc3. Any hints
> > > > > > what could be the problem? It worked perfectly with 2.6.15.x and
> > > > > > suspend2 2.2.
> > > > >
> > > > > a) Look in the logs for any oopses, other nasties
> > > >
> > > > Nothing.
> > > >
> > > > > b) Do `echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger', `dmesg -s 1000000 > foo' then
> > > > > find the trace for `hald' in `foo', send it to this list.
> > > >
> > > > Ok, here it is:
> > > >
> > > > [ trace snipped ]
> > > >
> > > > This is with 2.6.16-rc4-git1 + suspend2 2.2.0.1.
> > >
> > > Hopefully suspend2 isn't involved.  People would feel more comfortable
> > > if you could test a vanilla mainline tree..
> > >
> > > Could the ACPI team please take a look at fixing this regression?
> >
> > I did two cycles with mainline suspend now and did not hit the problem...
> > I will keep an eye on it.
>
> Could you let me know how you go? I didn't make any changes between 2.2 and
> 2.2.0.1 that I think could cause this, but if you can't reproduce it
> otherwise, I'll happily look again.

You just missed my last mail. It happens with mainline suspend as well, so it 
is not your fault.

Regards,
-- 
Christian

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]

Re: hald in status D with 2.6.16-rc4

[Nigel Cunningham]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1812 bytes --]

Hi.

On Thursday 23 February 2006 08:36, Hesse, Christian wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 February 2006 12:09, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 February 2006 20:10, Hesse, Christian wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 23:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 06:19, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > > "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello everybody,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > since using kernel version 2.6.16-rc4 the hal daemon is in
> > > > > > > status D after resume. I use suspend2 2.2.0.1 for 2.6.16-rc3.
> > > > > > > Any hints what could be the problem? It worked perfectly with
> > > > > > > 2.6.15.x and suspend2 2.2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a) Look in the logs for any oopses, other nasties
> > > > >
> > > > > Nothing.
> > > > >
> > > > > > b) Do `echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger', `dmesg -s 1000000 > foo'
> > > > > > then find the trace for `hald' in `foo', send it to this list.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok, here it is:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ trace snipped ]
> > > > >
> > > > > This is with 2.6.16-rc4-git1 + suspend2 2.2.0.1.
> > > >
> > > > Hopefully suspend2 isn't involved.  People would feel more
> > > > comfortable if you could test a vanilla mainline tree..
> > > >
> > > > Could the ACPI team please take a look at fixing this regression?
> > >
> > > I did two cycles with mainline suspend now and did not hit the
> > > problem... I will keep an eye on it.
> >
> > Could you let me know how you go? I didn't make any changes between 2.2
> > and 2.2.0.1 that I think could cause this, but if you can't reproduce it
> > otherwise, I'll happily look again.
>
> You just missed my last mail. It happens with mainline suspend as well, so
> it is not your fault.

Ok. Thanks! :)

Nigel

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: hald in status D with 2.6.16-rc4

[Hesse, Christian]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1681 bytes --]

On Wednesday 22 February 2006 21:12, Hesse, Christian wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 February 2006 11:10, Hesse, Christian wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 23:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 06:19, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
> > > > > > Hello everybody,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > since using kernel version 2.6.16-rc4 the hal daemon is in status
> > > > > > D after resume. I use suspend2 2.2.0.1 for 2.6.16-rc3. Any hints
> > > > > > what could be the problem? It worked perfectly with 2.6.15.x and
> > > > > > suspend2 2.2.
> > > > >
> > > > > a) Look in the logs for any oopses, other nasties
> > > >
> > > > Nothing.
> > > >
> > > > > b) Do `echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger', `dmesg -s 1000000 > foo' then
> > > > > find the trace for `hald' in `foo', send it to this list.
> > > >
> > > > Ok, here it is:
> > > >
> > > > [ trace snipped ]
> > > >
> > > > This is with 2.6.16-rc4-git1 + suspend2 2.2.0.1.
> > >
> > > Hopefully suspend2 isn't involved.  People would feel more comfortable
> > > if you could test a vanilla mainline tree..
> > >
> > > Could the ACPI team please take a look at fixing this regression?
> >
> > I did two cycles with mainline suspend now and did not hit the problem...
> > I will keep an eye on it.
>
> It is independent from suspend version, hald hangs with mainline suspend as
> well.

I think this is a big regression since 2.5.15. Is anybody working on it? I did 
not get a reply for nearly a week now...
If anybody needs more information let me know.
-- 
Regards,
Christian

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]

Re: hald in status D with 2.6.16-rc4

[Nigel Cunningham]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1816 bytes --]

Hi.

On Tuesday 28 February 2006 08:48, Hesse, Christian wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 February 2006 21:12, Hesse, Christian wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 February 2006 11:10, Hesse, Christian wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 23:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 06:19, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > > "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello everybody,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > since using kernel version 2.6.16-rc4 the hal daemon is in
> > > > > > > status D after resume. I use suspend2 2.2.0.1 for 2.6.16-rc3.
> > > > > > > Any hints what could be the problem? It worked perfectly with
> > > > > > > 2.6.15.x and suspend2 2.2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a) Look in the logs for any oopses, other nasties
> > > > >
> > > > > Nothing.
> > > > >
> > > > > > b) Do `echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger', `dmesg -s 1000000 > foo'
> > > > > > then find the trace for `hald' in `foo', send it to this list.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok, here it is:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ trace snipped ]
> > > > >
> > > > > This is with 2.6.16-rc4-git1 + suspend2 2.2.0.1.
> > > >
> > > > Hopefully suspend2 isn't involved.  People would feel more
> > > > comfortable if you could test a vanilla mainline tree..
> > > >
> > > > Could the ACPI team please take a look at fixing this regression?
> > >
> > > I did two cycles with mainline suspend now and did not hit the
> > > problem... I will keep an eye on it.
> >
> > It is independent from suspend version, hald hangs with mainline suspend
> > as well.
>
> I think this is a big regression since 2.5.15. Is anybody working on it? I
> did not get a reply for nearly a week now...
> If anybody needs more information let me know.

I would suggest bugging the acpi guys :)

Regards,

Nigel

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: hald in status D with 2.6.16-rc4

[Hesse, Christian]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2038 bytes --]

On Tuesday 28 February 2006 01:40, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 February 2006 08:48, Hesse, Christian wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 February 2006 21:12, Hesse, Christian wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 22 February 2006 11:10, Hesse, Christian wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 23:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
> > > > > > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 06:19, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > > > "Hesse, Christian" <mail@earthworm.de> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hello everybody,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > since using kernel version 2.6.16-rc4 the hal daemon is in
> > > > > > > > status D after resume. I use suspend2 2.2.0.1 for 2.6.16-rc3.
> > > > > > > > Any hints what could be the problem? It worked perfectly with
> > > > > > > > 2.6.15.x and suspend2 2.2.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > a) Look in the logs for any oopses, other nasties
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nothing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > b) Do `echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger', `dmesg -s 1000000 > foo'
> > > > > > > then find the trace for `hald' in `foo', send it to this list.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ok, here it is:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ trace snipped ]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is with 2.6.16-rc4-git1 + suspend2 2.2.0.1.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hopefully suspend2 isn't involved.  People would feel more
> > > > > comfortable if you could test a vanilla mainline tree..
> > > > >
> > > > > Could the ACPI team please take a look at fixing this regression?
> > > >
> > > > I did two cycles with mainline suspend now and did not hit the
> > > > problem... I will keep an eye on it.
> > >
> > > It is independent from suspend version, hald hangs with mainline
> > > suspend as well.
> >
> > I think this is a big regression since 2.5.15. Is anybody working on it?
> > I did not get a reply for nearly a week now...
> > If anybody needs more information let me know.
>
> I would suggest bugging the acpi guys :)

They are in cc, but nobody cares. :(
-- 
Christian

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]