* [stable][patch] x86_64: fix number of ia32 syscalls
@ 2006-05-22 20:59 Chuck Ebbert
2006-05-22 23:11 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-23 14:33 ` Michael Buesch
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Ebbert @ 2006-05-22 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Andi Kleen, Adrian Bunk, Dave Jones, Ulrich Drepper, linux-stable
Recent discussions about whether to print a message about unimplemented
ia32 syscalls on x86_64 have missed the real bug: the number of ia32
syscalls is wrong in 2.6.16. Fixing that kills the message.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
--- 2.6.16.17-64.orig/include/asm-x86_64/ia32_unistd.h
+++ 2.6.16.17-64/include/asm-x86_64/ia32_unistd.h
@@ -317,6 +317,6 @@
#define __NR_ia32_ppoll 309
#define __NR_ia32_unshare 310
-#define IA32_NR_syscalls 315 /* must be > than biggest syscall! */
+#define IA32_NR_syscalls 311 /* must be > than biggest syscall! */
#endif /* _ASM_X86_64_IA32_UNISTD_H_ */
--
Chuck
"The x86 isn't all that complex -- it just doesn't make a lot of sense."
-- Mike Johnson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [stable][patch] x86_64: fix number of ia32 syscalls
2006-05-22 20:59 [stable][patch] x86_64: fix number of ia32 syscalls Chuck Ebbert
@ 2006-05-22 23:11 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-22 23:24 ` Chris Wright
2006-05-22 23:31 ` Brian Gerst
2006-05-23 14:33 ` Michael Buesch
1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-05-22 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuck Ebbert
Cc: linux-kernel, Adrian Bunk, Dave Jones, Ulrich Drepper, linux-stable
On Monday 22 May 2006 22:59, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Recent discussions about whether to print a message about unimplemented
> ia32 syscalls on x86_64 have missed the real bug: the number of ia32
> syscalls is wrong in 2.6.16. Fixing that kills the message.
There is already a slightly different patch for this in the FF tree.
-Andi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [stable][patch] x86_64: fix number of ia32 syscalls
2006-05-22 23:11 ` Andi Kleen
@ 2006-05-22 23:24 ` Chris Wright
2006-05-22 23:31 ` Brian Gerst
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wright @ 2006-05-22 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andi Kleen
Cc: Chuck Ebbert, Ulrich Drepper, Dave Jones, linux-stable,
linux-kernel, Adrian Bunk
* Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de) wrote:
> On Monday 22 May 2006 22:59, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > Recent discussions about whether to print a message about unimplemented
> > ia32 syscalls on x86_64 have missed the real bug: the number of ia32
> > syscalls is wrong in 2.6.16. Fixing that kills the message.
>
> There is already a slightly different patch for this in the FF tree.
OK, if there's smth you think is good for -stable, just send it over.
thanks,
-chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [stable][patch] x86_64: fix number of ia32 syscalls
2006-05-22 23:11 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-22 23:24 ` Chris Wright
@ 2006-05-22 23:31 ` Brian Gerst
2006-05-23 2:50 ` Andi Kleen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Brian Gerst @ 2006-05-22 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: lkml
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 22 May 2006 22:59, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>> Recent discussions about whether to print a message about unimplemented
>> ia32 syscalls on x86_64 have missed the real bug: the number of ia32
>> syscalls is wrong in 2.6.16. Fixing that kills the message.
>
> There is already a slightly different patch for this in the FF tree.
>
Where is the FF tree?
--
Brian Gerst
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [stable][patch] x86_64: fix number of ia32 syscalls
2006-05-22 23:31 ` Brian Gerst
@ 2006-05-23 2:50 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-05-23 2:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Gerst; +Cc: lkml
On Tuesday 23 May 2006 01:31, Brian Gerst wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Monday 22 May 2006 22:59, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> >> Recent discussions about whether to print a message about unimplemented
> >> ia32 syscalls on x86_64 have missed the real bug: the number of ia32
> >> syscalls is wrong in 2.6.16. Fixing that kills the message.
> >
> > There is already a slightly different patch for this in the FF tree.
> >
>
> Where is the FF tree?
ftp://ftp.firstfloor.org/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt/
-Andi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [stable][patch] x86_64: fix number of ia32 syscalls
2006-05-22 20:59 [stable][patch] x86_64: fix number of ia32 syscalls Chuck Ebbert
2006-05-22 23:11 ` Andi Kleen
@ 2006-05-23 14:33 ` Michael Buesch
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael Buesch @ 2006-05-23 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuck Ebbert
Cc: Andi Kleen, Adrian Bunk, Dave Jones, Ulrich Drepper,
linux-stable, linux-kernel
On Monday 22 May 2006 22:59, you wrote:
> Recent discussions about whether to print a message about unimplemented
> ia32 syscalls on x86_64 have missed the real bug: the number of ia32
> syscalls is wrong in 2.6.16. Fixing that kills the message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
>
> --- 2.6.16.17-64.orig/include/asm-x86_64/ia32_unistd.h
> +++ 2.6.16.17-64/include/asm-x86_64/ia32_unistd.h
> @@ -317,6 +317,6 @@
> #define __NR_ia32_ppoll 309
> #define __NR_ia32_unshare 310
>
> -#define IA32_NR_syscalls 315 /* must be > than biggest syscall! */
Maybe fix the comment so this is more clear, too?
/* must be biggest syscall + 1 */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-05-23 14:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-05-22 20:59 [stable][patch] x86_64: fix number of ia32 syscalls Chuck Ebbert
2006-05-22 23:11 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-22 23:24 ` Chris Wright
2006-05-22 23:31 ` Brian Gerst
2006-05-23 2:50 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-23 14:33 ` Michael Buesch
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).