From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ck list <ck@vds.kolivas.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:29:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070313092920.GB7648@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703132021.50712.kernel@kolivas.org>
* Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> Well I guess you must have missed where I asked him if he would be
> happy if I changed +5 metrics to do whatever he wanted and he refused
> to answer me. [...]
I'd say lets keep nice levels out of this completely for now - while
they should work _too_, it's easy because the scheduler has the 'nice'
information. The basic behavior of CPU hogs that matters most.
So the question is: if all tasks are on the same nice level, how does,
in Mike's test scenario, RSDL behave relative to the current
interactivity code?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-13 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-11 3:57 [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2 Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 11:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-11 11:48 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 12:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-11 12:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-11 12:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-11 21:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 7:22 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 7:48 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 8:29 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 8:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 9:22 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 9:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 10:27 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 10:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 11:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-12 11:23 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 13:48 ` Theodore Tso
2007-03-12 18:09 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 14:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 15:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-12 18:10 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 19:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-12 20:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 4:17 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-03-13 8:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-12 18:49 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 19:06 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-03-13 17:21 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-03-12 20:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 20:38 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 20:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 22:51 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 5:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 5:53 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 6:08 ` [ck] " Rodney Gordon II
2007-03-13 6:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 7:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 8:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-13 8:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-13 8:22 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 9:21 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 9:29 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-03-13 9:41 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 10:50 ` Bill Huey
2007-03-13 9:31 ` [ck] " Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 10:24 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-03-13 23:19 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2007-03-13 9:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-13 10:06 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 11:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 11:41 ` Serge Belyshev
2007-03-13 11:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 15:36 ` John Stoffel
2007-03-13 14:17 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-13 15:15 ` David Schwartz
2007-03-13 17:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-13 19:58 ` David Schwartz
2007-03-13 20:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-13 20:35 ` Bill Huey
2007-03-13 20:27 ` Bill Huey
2007-03-16 16:42 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-12 23:43 ` David Lang
2007-03-13 2:23 ` Lee Revell
2007-03-13 6:00 ` David Lang
2007-03-12 21:34 ` [ck] " jos poortvliet
2007-03-12 21:38 ` michael chang
2007-03-13 0:09 ` Thibaut VARENE
2007-03-13 6:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-13 6:16 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 6:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 20:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-12 21:05 ` Serge Belyshev
2007-03-12 21:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 11:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12 9:38 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-03-12 10:34 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 16:38 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-03-14 2:25 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-03-14 3:25 ` Gabriel C
2007-03-14 9:44 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-03-12 8:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-11 14:32 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 6:58 ` Radoslaw Szkodzinski
2007-03-12 11:16 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 11:49 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 11:58 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 16:38 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 18:34 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 19:53 Al Boldi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070313092920.GB7648@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).