* RTC_CLASS is still considered as EXPERIMENTAL?
@ 2007-06-15 16:10 Atsushi Nemoto
2007-06-15 18:19 ` [rtc-linux] " Alessandro Zummo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Atsushi Nemoto @ 2007-06-15 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: a.zummo, rtc-linux
The generic RTC subsystem was added to kernel 2.6.17 which was
released a years ago. Since then, many drivers were added to the
subsystem without major API changes, I think.
It is mature enough to remove EXPERIMENTAL label from RTC_CLASS, isn't
it?
---
Atsushi Nemoto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [rtc-linux] RTC_CLASS is still considered as EXPERIMENTAL?
2007-06-15 16:10 RTC_CLASS is still considered as EXPERIMENTAL? Atsushi Nemoto
@ 2007-06-15 18:19 ` Alessandro Zummo
2007-06-19 12:09 ` Alessandro Zummo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alessandro Zummo @ 2007-06-15 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rtc-linux; +Cc: anemo, linux-kernel, a.zummo
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 01:10:37 +0900 (JST)
Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
>
> The generic RTC subsystem was added to kernel 2.6.17 which was
> released a years ago. Since then, many drivers were added to the
> subsystem without major API changes, I think.
>
> It is mature enough to remove EXPERIMENTAL label from RTC_CLASS, isn't
> it?
I'd say yes, I will submit a patch. ty.
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [rtc-linux] RTC_CLASS is still considered as EXPERIMENTAL?
2007-06-15 18:19 ` [rtc-linux] " Alessandro Zummo
@ 2007-06-19 12:09 ` Alessandro Zummo
2007-06-19 15:03 ` Atsushi Nemoto
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alessandro Zummo @ 2007-06-19 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: rtc-linux, anemo, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:19:59 +0200
Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 01:10:37 +0900 (JST)
> Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
>
> >
> > The generic RTC subsystem was added to kernel 2.6.17 which was
> > released a years ago. Since then, many drivers were added to the
> > subsystem without major API changes, I think.
> >
> > It is mature enough to remove EXPERIMENTAL label from RTC_CLASS, isn't
> > it?
>
> I'd say yes, I will submit a patch. ty.
RTC class is mature enough.
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
---
drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-i386.orig/drivers/rtc/Kconfig 2007-06-18 23:43:28.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-i386/drivers/rtc/Kconfig 2007-06-19 14:06:09.000000000 +0200
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ config RTC_LIB
config RTC_CLASS
tristate "RTC class"
- depends on EXPERIMENTAL
default n
select RTC_LIB
help
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [rtc-linux] RTC_CLASS is still considered as EXPERIMENTAL?
2007-06-19 12:09 ` Alessandro Zummo
@ 2007-06-19 15:03 ` Atsushi Nemoto
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Atsushi Nemoto @ 2007-06-19 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alessandro.zummo; +Cc: rtc-linux, linux-kernel, akpm
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:09:19 +0200, Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it> wrote:
> > > It is mature enough to remove EXPERIMENTAL label from RTC_CLASS, isn't
> > > it?
> >
> > I'd say yes, I will submit a patch. ty.
>
> RTC class is mature enough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Thanks. I suppose this helps dropping CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL from some
defconfigs.
---
Atsushi Nemoto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-06-19 15:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-06-15 16:10 RTC_CLASS is still considered as EXPERIMENTAL? Atsushi Nemoto
2007-06-15 18:19 ` [rtc-linux] " Alessandro Zummo
2007-06-19 12:09 ` Alessandro Zummo
2007-06-19 15:03 ` Atsushi Nemoto
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).