Re: Linux Kernel include files - Jan-Benedict Glaw

From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
To: Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, harald@skogtun.org, david@lang.hm
Subject: Re: Linux Kernel include files
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:57:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070628105702.GA27862@lug-owl.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46838ffd.bUYvs93vY6OX67Mk%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1113 bytes --]

On Thu, 2007-06-28 12:39:57 +0200, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> > > > By the way, your mailer seems to be sometimes omitting In-Reply-To: and
> > > > References: headers, which RFC2822 says you SHOULD include in replies. 
> > > 
> > > Sending such accusation without knowing the reason is not polite.
> >
> > It's not an accusation -- it's merely an observation. You may not have
> > noticed that your mailer was misbehaving; now you _do_ know, and if you
> > care about RFC compliance you might want to fix it. You're not _obliged_
> > to fix it, of course. I just thought you'd like to know.
> 
> Well there you are: my mailer is definitely NOT missbehaving.
> Please do not repeat similar accusations when not knowing the reason.

Just out of interest: In which cases do you want to break threading?

MfG, JBG

-- 
      Jan-Benedict Glaw      jbglaw@lug-owl.de              +49-172-7608481
Signature of:              What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for
the second  :         others and the world remains and is immortal. (Albert Pine)

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]