* KVM binary incompatiablity
@ 2008-02-08 19:32 Stephen Hemminger
2008-02-08 22:22 ` [kvm-devel] " Anthony Liguori
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2008-02-08 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity; +Cc: kvm-devel, linux-kernel
I notice that recent KVM is incompatiable with older versions.
Using a KVM image created on 2.6.24 will crash on 2.6.25 (or
vice versa). It appears that Ubuntu Hardy has incorporated the 2.6.25
update even though it claims to be 2.6.24.
This is reproducible on Intel (64bit) kernel. Was this intentional?
is it documented?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-devel] KVM binary incompatiablity
2008-02-08 19:32 KVM binary incompatiablity Stephen Hemminger
@ 2008-02-08 22:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-02-09 0:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Liguori @ 2008-02-08 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: Avi Kivity, kvm-devel, linux-kernel
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> I notice that recent KVM is incompatiable with older versions.
>
> Using a KVM image created on 2.6.24 will crash on 2.6.25 (or
> vice versa). It appears that Ubuntu Hardy has incorporated the 2.6.25
> update even though it claims to be 2.6.24.
>
This isn't intentional. What is the guest and how does it crash?
I've been using the same image for most of KVM's development life cycle
without having issues.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> This is reproducible on Intel (64bit) kernel. Was this intentional?
> is it documented?
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> kvm-devel mailing list
> kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-devel] KVM binary incompatiablity
2008-02-08 22:22 ` [kvm-devel] " Anthony Liguori
@ 2008-02-09 0:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2008-02-09 0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anthony Liguori; +Cc: Avi Kivity, kvm-devel, linux-kernel
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:22:12 -0600
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > I notice that recent KVM is incompatiable with older versions.
> >
> > Using a KVM image created on 2.6.24 will crash on 2.6.25 (or
> > vice versa). It appears that Ubuntu Hardy has incorporated the 2.6.25
> > update even though it claims to be 2.6.24.
> >
>
> This isn't intentional. What is the guest and how does it crash?
>
> I've been using the same image for most of KVM's development life cycle
> without having issues.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>
I'll see if I can get a backtrace, it isn't reliably reproducible.
--
Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@vyatta.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-09 0:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-08 19:32 KVM binary incompatiablity Stephen Hemminger
2008-02-08 22:22 ` [kvm-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2008-02-09 0:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).