From: Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ELF: implement AT_RANDOM for future glibc use
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:15:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081003051543.GQ10632@outflux.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081003005258.7FEDE154212@magilla.localdomain>
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 05:52:58PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I think the safe available AT_* values to use are 25, 26.
Out of curiosity, why are there gaps? I figure I can include some
comments in that header to explain the gaps for future AT_* creations.
> I would configure the size in bytes. Ulrich suggested it be 16 bytes on
> both 32-bit and 64-bit machines.
I was trying to make the size compile-time static so I could avoid
kmalloc'ing a buffer for get_random_bytes(). But maybe avoid that isn't
sensible?
As for 16 bytes on both 32bit and 64bit, I was aiming to have 4
pointer-sized random values. 16 works for 32bit, but I was hoping to
have 32 on 64bit. Perhaps I am over-estimating?
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Ubuntu Security Team
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-03 5:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20081001201116.GD12527@outflux.net>
[not found] ` <48E3EFD6.2010704@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20081001215657.GH12527@outflux.net>
[not found] ` <20081001220948.GC32107@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
[not found] ` <20081001222706.68E7E1544B4@magilla.localdomain>
2008-10-03 0:16 ` [PATCH] ELF: implement AT_RANDOM for future glibc use Kees Cook
2008-10-03 0:43 ` Jakub Jelinek
2008-10-03 5:25 ` Kees Cook
2008-10-03 5:29 ` Kees Cook
2008-10-03 5:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-03 6:25 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-10-03 14:50 ` [PATCH] ELF: implement AT_RANDOM for glibc PRNG seeding Kees Cook
2008-10-03 14:56 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-10-03 14:57 ` Jakub Jelinek
2008-10-03 17:33 ` Kees Cook
2008-10-03 17:41 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-10-03 17:59 ` [PATCH v5] " Kees Cook
2008-10-18 5:42 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-10-21 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-21 20:22 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-10-27 5:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-03 0:52 ` [PATCH] ELF: implement AT_RANDOM for future glibc use Roland McGrath
2008-10-03 5:15 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2008-10-03 20:22 ` Roland McGrath
2008-10-06 6:00 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 17:50 ` Kees Cook
2008-10-06 18:25 ` David Wagner
2008-10-06 20:23 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 22:16 ` David Wagner
2008-10-06 19:26 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 22:01 ` Kees Cook
2008-10-06 23:19 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 23:29 ` Kees Cook
2008-10-06 23:44 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 22:07 ` Kees Cook
2008-10-06 23:28 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 23:58 ` Roland McGrath
2008-10-07 0:08 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-10-07 0:31 ` Kees Cook
2008-10-07 0:57 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-10-07 1:44 ` Kees Cook
2008-10-07 1:51 ` Ulrich Drepper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081003051543.GQ10632@outflux.net \
--to=kees.cook@canonical.com \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).