2.6.27-rc8-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.26

2.6.27-rc8-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.26

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.26, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of.  If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.26, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list.  Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2008-10-04      181       41          33
  2008-09-27      173       35          28
  2008-09-21      169       45          36
  2008-09-15      163       46          32
  2008-09-12      163       51          38
  2008-09-07      150       43          33
  2008-08-30      135       48          36
  2008-08-23      122       48          40
  2008-08-16      103       47          37
  2008-08-10       80       52          31
  2008-08-02       47       31          20


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11700
Subject		: ACPI instabilities and IRQs being disabled
Submitter	: Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com>
Date		: 2008-09-27 22:40 (8 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122255527412178&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11699
Subject		: 2.6.27-rc-7: BUG: scheduling while atomic, c1e_idle+0x98/0xe0
Submitter	: Prakash Punnoor <prakash@punnoor.de>
Date		: 2008-09-28 17:45 (7 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122262403415629&w=4
Handled-By	: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11698
Subject		: 2.6.27-rc7, freezes with &gt; 1 s2ram cycle
Submitter	: Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de>
Date		: 2008-09-29 11:29 (6 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122268780926859&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11697
Subject		: CD tray closes spontaneously after opening it
Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date		: 2008-09-30 10:47 (5 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122277167125264&w=4
Handled-By	: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11695
Subject		: USB disconnects every 30 seconds
Submitter	: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Date		: 2008-10-03 17:45 (2 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122305738430115&w=4
Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11676
Subject		: 2.6.27-rc2 to rc8, apgart fails, iommu=soft works, regression
Submitter	: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Date		: 2008-09-30 10:24 (5 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11664
Subject		: acpi errors and random freeze on sony vaio sr
Submitter	: Giovanni Pellerano <giovanni.pellerano@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-09-28 03:48 (7 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11643
Subject		: ALSA sound/core/pcm_native.c:1947: BUG? (err &gt;= 0)
Submitter	: sangu <sangu.gnome@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-09-24 16:51 (11 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11634
Subject		: Sometime my laptop is dead on resume from ram
Submitter	: Romano Giannetti <romano.giannetti@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-09-24 01:12 (11 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11608
Subject		: 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter	: John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-09-16 23:00 (19 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122160611517267&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11607
Subject		: 2.6.27-rc6  Bug in tty_chars_in_buffer
Submitter	: John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-09-15 2:26 (20 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122144565514490&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11569
Subject		: Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced
Submitter	: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date		: 2008-09-02 13:49 (33 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122036356127282&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568
Subject		: spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27
Submitter	: Andy Wettstein <ajw1980@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-09-14 20:00 (21 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject		: kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter	: Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
Date		: 2008-09-11 16:46 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By	: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
		  Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
		  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11516
Subject		: severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -&gt; 2.6.27-rc5
Submitter	: Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-09-07 13:59 (28 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512
Subject		: sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig"
Submitter	: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-09-05 22:50 (30 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11504
Subject		: reiserfs  BUG in 2.6.27-rc5
Submitter	: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date		: 2008-09-03 16:35 (32 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122045982120138&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476
Subject		: failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram
Submitter	: Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-09-01 13:33 (34 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
		  Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
		  Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407
Subject		: suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter	: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-08-21 17:28 (45 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
		  Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
		  Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404
Subject		: BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr
Submitter	: rdunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date		: 2008-08-21 5:52 (45 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4
Handled-By	: Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller@hp.com>
		  James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380
Subject		: lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16
Submitter	: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date		: 2008-08-20 6:44 (46 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340
Subject		: LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box
Submitter	: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-08-13 9:24 (53 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308
Subject		: tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -&gt; 2.6.28
Submitter	: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Date		: 2008-08-11 18:36 (55 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272
Subject		: BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835
Submitter	: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-08-05 15:12 (61 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271
Subject		: BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-08-05 14:58 (61 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98
Handled-By	: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264
Subject		: Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue
Submitter	: Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-08-07 04:18 (59 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11230
Subject		: Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs
Submitter	: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date		: 2008-08-02 16:03 (64 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121769306319391&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224
Subject		: Only three cores found on quad-core machine.
Submitter	: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Date		: 2008-08-01 18:15 (65 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220
Subject		: Screen stays black after resume
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico@schottelius.org>
Date		: 2008-07-31 21:05 (66 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215
Subject		: INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command
Submitter	: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 9:41 (66 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4
Handled-By	: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210
Subject		: libata badness
Submitter	: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Date		: 2008-07-31 18:53 (66 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4
Handled-By	: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209
Subject		: 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting
Submitter	: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
Date		: 2008-07-31 10:43 (66 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121750102917490&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/30/199
Handled-By	: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (66 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11701
Subject		: sky2 wol regression
Submitter	: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@gmx.de>
Date		: 2008-09-24 8:05 (11 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122224359222164&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122298334522551&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11696
Subject		: 2.6.27-rc8 doubled times
Submitter	: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Date		: 2008-10-03 10:21 (2 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122302939313636&w=4
Handled-By	: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122307260621434&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11629
Subject		: quad G5 fails to shut down
Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date		: 2008-09-23 14:20 (12 days old)
Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11629#c8


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11615
Subject		: sata_nv EH problems
Submitter	: Pär Andersson <paran@lysator.liu.se>
Date		: 2008-09-21 18:09 (14 days old)
Handled-By	: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18078&action=view


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550
Subject		: pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages
Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date		: 2008-09-09 10:50 (26 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4
Handled-By	: Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
		  Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122246533505643&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11549
Subject		: 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup
Submitter	: <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com>
Date		: 2008-09-02 21:27 (33 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122039255517586&w=4
Handled-By	: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18047&action=view


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505
Subject		: oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine
Submitter	: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Date		: 2008-09-04 7:06 (31 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?t=122089704700005&r=1&w=4
Handled-By	: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
		  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122194673932703&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442
Subject		: btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git
Submitter	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Date		: 2008-08-25 11:37 (41 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4
Handled-By	: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4
		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442#c1


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.26,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11167

Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.

Thanks,
Rafael

[Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (66 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>

[Bug #11209] 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209
Subject		: 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting
Submitter	: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
Date		: 2008-07-31 10:43 (66 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121750102917490&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/30/199
Handled-By	: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>

[Bug #11210] libata badness

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210
Subject		: libata badness
Submitter	: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Date		: 2008-07-31 18:53 (66 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4
Handled-By	: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>

[Bug #11215] INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215
Subject		: INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command
Submitter	: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 9:41 (66 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4
Handled-By	: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>

[Bug #11220] Screen stays black after resume

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220
Subject		: Screen stays black after resume
Submitter	: Nico Schottelius <nico@schottelius.org>
Date		: 2008-07-31 21:05 (66 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4

[Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine.

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224
Subject		: Only three cores found on quad-core machine.
Submitter	: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Date		: 2008-08-01 18:15 (65 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4

[Bug #11271] BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271
Subject		: BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-08-05 14:58 (61 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98
Handled-By	: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>

[Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264
Subject		: Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue
Submitter	: Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-08-07 04:18 (59 days old)

[Bug #11230] Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11230
Subject		: Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs
Submitter	: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date		: 2008-08-02 16:03 (64 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121769306319391&w=4

[Bug #11272] BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272
Subject		: BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835
Submitter	: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-08-05 15:12 (61 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4

[Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308
Subject		: tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
Submitter	: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Date		: 2008-08-11 18:36 (55 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4

[Bug #11340] LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340
Subject		: LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box
Submitter	: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-08-13 9:24 (53 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4

[Bug #11407] suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407
Subject		: suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter	: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-08-21 17:28 (45 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
		  Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
		  Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>

[Bug #11380] lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380
Subject		: lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16
Submitter	: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date		: 2008-08-20 6:44 (46 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4

[Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404
Subject		: BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr
Submitter	: rdunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date		: 2008-08-21 5:52 (45 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4
Handled-By	: Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller@hp.com>
		  James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>

[Bug #11442] btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442
Subject		: btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git
Submitter	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Date		: 2008-08-25 11:37 (41 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4
Handled-By	: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4
		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442#c1

[Bug #11476] failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476
Subject		: failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram
Submitter	: Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-09-01 13:33 (34 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
		  Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
		  Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>

[Bug #11516] severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11516
Subject		: severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5
Submitter	: Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-09-07 13:59 (28 days old)

[Bug #11512] sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig"

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512
Subject		: sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig"
Submitter	: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-09-05 22:50 (30 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4

[Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject		: kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter	: Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
Date		: 2008-09-11 16:46 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By	: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
		  Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
		  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

[Bug #11505] oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505
Subject		: oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine
Submitter	: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Date		: 2008-09-04 7:06 (31 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?t=122089704700005&r=1&w=4
Handled-By	: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
		  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122194673932703&w=4

[Bug #11568] spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568
Subject		: spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27
Submitter	: Andy Wettstein <ajw1980@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-09-14 20:00 (21 days old)

[Bug #11549] 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11549
Subject		: 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup
Submitter	: <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com>
Date		: 2008-09-02 21:27 (33 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122039255517586&w=4
Handled-By	: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18047&action=view

[Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550
Subject		: pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages
Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date		: 2008-09-09 10:50 (26 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4
Handled-By	: Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
		  Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122246533505643&w=4

[Bug #11569] Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11569
Subject		: Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced
Submitter	: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date		: 2008-09-02 13:49 (33 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122036356127282&w=4

[Bug #11608] 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11608
Subject		: 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter	: John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-09-16 23:00 (19 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122160611517267&w=4

[Bug #11615] sata_nv EH problems

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11615
Subject		: sata_nv EH problems
Submitter	: Pär Andersson <paran@lysator.liu.se>
Date		: 2008-09-21 18:09 (14 days old)
Handled-By	: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18078&action=view

[Bug #11629] quad G5 fails to shut down

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11629
Subject		: quad G5 fails to shut down
Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date		: 2008-09-23 14:20 (12 days old)
Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11629#c8

[Bug #11643] ALSA sound/core/pcm_native.c:1947: BUG? (err >= 0)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11643
Subject		: ALSA sound/core/pcm_native.c:1947: BUG? (err >= 0)
Submitter	: sangu <sangu.gnome@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-09-24 16:51 (11 days old)

[Bug #11634] Sometime my laptop is dead on resume from ram

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11634
Subject		: Sometime my laptop is dead on resume from ram
Submitter	: Romano Giannetti <romano.giannetti@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-09-24 01:12 (11 days old)

[Bug #11664] acpi errors and random freeze on sony vaio sr

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11664
Subject		: acpi errors and random freeze on sony vaio sr
Submitter	: Giovanni Pellerano <giovanni.pellerano@gmail.com>
Date		: 2008-09-28 03:48 (7 days old)

[Bug #11676] 2.6.27-rc2 to rc8, apgart fails, iommu=soft works, regression

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11676
Subject		: 2.6.27-rc2 to rc8, apgart fails, iommu=soft works, regression
Submitter	: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Date		: 2008-09-30 10:24 (5 days old)

[Bug #11696] 2.6.27-rc8 doubled times

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11696
Subject		: 2.6.27-rc8 doubled times
Submitter	: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Date		: 2008-10-03 10:21 (2 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122302939313636&w=4
Handled-By	: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122307260621434&w=4

[Bug #11695] USB disconnects every 30 seconds

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11695
Subject		: USB disconnects every 30 seconds
Submitter	: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Date		: 2008-10-03 17:45 (2 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122305738430115&w=4
Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>

[Bug #11698] 2.6.27-rc7, freezes with > 1 s2ram cycle

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11698
Subject		: 2.6.27-rc7, freezes with > 1 s2ram cycle
Submitter	: Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de>
Date		: 2008-09-29 11:29 (6 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122268780926859&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

[Bug #11697] CD tray closes spontaneously after opening it

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11697
Subject		: CD tray closes spontaneously after opening it
Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date		: 2008-09-30 10:47 (5 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122277167125264&w=4
Handled-By	: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>

[Bug #11700] ACPI instabilities and IRQs being disabled

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11700
Subject		: ACPI instabilities and IRQs being disabled
Submitter	: Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com>
Date		: 2008-09-27 22:40 (8 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122255527412178&w=4

[Bug #11699] 2.6.27-rc-7: BUG: scheduling while atomic, c1e_idle+0x98/0xe0

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11699
Subject		: 2.6.27-rc-7: BUG: scheduling while atomic, c1e_idle+0x98/0xe0
Submitter	: Prakash Punnoor <prakash@punnoor.de>
Date		: 2008-09-28 17:45 (7 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122262403415629&w=4
Handled-By	: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

[Bug #11701] sky2 wol regression

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11701
Subject		: sky2 wol regression
Submitter	: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@gmx.de>
Date		: 2008-09-24 8:05 (11 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122224359222164&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122298334522551&w=4

Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

[Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 07:32:52PM +0200]
| This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| of recent regressions.
| 
| The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
| (either way).
| 
| 
| Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| Subject		: kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| Submitter	: Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
| Date		: 2008-09-11 16:46 (24 days old)
| References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| Handled-By	: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
| 		  Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
| 		  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
| 
| 

Joshua is testing -rc8 now. He said (in bugzilla entry):
>
> -rc8 proved itself stable for a few days on two test nodes and it's being
> rolled out onto 32 nodes production nodes as I type this.  The bug strikes
> somewhat randomly so it'll take time for it to pop up in -rc8 if it's still
> there.  Heavy jobs will be running over the weekend and should trip this
> issues if it's still in there...
>

So we're waiting for his verdict.

		- Cyrill -

Re: [Bug #11615] sata_nv EH problems

[Thomas Backlund]

Rafael J. Wysocki skrev:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11615
> Subject		: sata_nv EH problems
> Submitter	: Pär Andersson <paran@lysator.liu.se>
> Date		: 2008-09-21 18:09 (14 days old)
> Handled-By	: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18078&action=view
> 
> 

Merged in:
http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4c1eb90a0908c0c60db2169dce08fb672e7582f1

--
Thomas

Re: [Bug #11442] btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git

[Marcel Holtmann]

Hi Rafael,

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442
> Subject		: btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git
> Submitter	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Date		: 2008-08-25 11:37 (41 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4
> Handled-By	: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
> Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4
> 		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442#c1

the patch is not the actual fix for it. It is just a band aid. As you
confirmed, the double free patch fixes it. See my pull request, but it
didn't make it into Linus' tree yet.

Regards

Marcel


Please pull from

    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/holtmann/bluetooth-2.6.git master

This will update the following files:

 drivers/bluetooth/bpa10x.c |    2 --
 drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c  |    7 ++++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

through these ChangeSets:

Marcel Holtmann (2):
    [Bluetooth] Fix double frees on error paths of btusb and bpa10x drivers
    [Bluetooth] Add reset quirk for new Targus and Belkin dongles

Re: [Bug #11442] btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday, 4 of October 2008, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442
> > Subject		: btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git
> > Submitter	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > Date		: 2008-08-25 11:37 (41 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4
> > Handled-By	: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
> > Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4
> > 		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442#c1
> 
> the patch is not the actual fix for it. It is just a band aid. As you
> confirmed, the double free patch fixes it. See my pull request, but it
> didn't make it into Linus' tree yet.

I know, I didn't close this entry just because the fix is not yet in the Linus'
tree.

Thanks,
Rafael


> Please pull from
> 
>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/holtmann/bluetooth-2.6.git master
> 
> This will update the following files:
> 
>  drivers/bluetooth/bpa10x.c |    2 --
>  drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c  |    7 ++++---
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> through these ChangeSets:
> 
> Marcel Holtmann (2):
>     [Bluetooth] Fix double frees on error paths of btusb and bpa10x drivers
>     [Bluetooth] Add reset quirk for new Targus and Belkin dongles

Re: [Bug #11615] sata_nv EH problems

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday, 4 of October 2008, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki skrev:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11615
> > Subject		: sata_nv EH problems
> > Submitter	: Pär Andersson <paran@lysator.liu.se>
> > Date		: 2008-09-21 18:09 (14 days old)
> > Handled-By	: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> > Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18078&action=view
> > 
> > 
> 
> Merged in:
> http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4c1eb90a0908c0c60db2169dce08fb672e7582f1

Thanks, closed.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #11629] quad G5 fails to shut down

[Thomas Backlund]

Rafael J. Wysocki skrev:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11629
> Subject		: quad G5 fails to shut down
> Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> Date		: 2008-09-23 14:20 (12 days old)
> Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11629#c8
> 
> 

Merged in:
http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=61e9916eba35dfb76d38013a5aae9a59cc50877a

--
Thomas

Re: [Bug #11629] quad G5 fails to shut down

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday, 4 of October 2008, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki skrev:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11629
> > Subject		: quad G5 fails to shut down
> > Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> > Date		: 2008-09-23 14:20 (12 days old)
> > Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> > Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11629#c8
> > 
> > 
> 
> Merged in:
> http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=61e9916eba35dfb76d38013a5aae9a59cc50877a

Thanks, closed.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #11696] 2.6.27-rc8 doubled times

[Hugh Dickins]

On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11696
> Subject		: 2.6.27-rc8 doubled times
> Submitter	: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
> Date		: 2008-10-03 10:21 (2 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122302939313636&w=4
> Handled-By	: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122307260621434&w=4

Can now be closed, thanks Rafael: Linus has taken Thomas's
commit 07454bfff151d2465ada809bbaddf3548cc1097c
clockevents: check broadcast tick device not the clock events device
and I've just confirmed that the latest git indeed fixes the issue.

Hugh

Re: 2.6.27-rc8-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.26

[Evgeniy Polyakov]

Hi.

On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 07:28:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw@sisk.pl) wrote:
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308
> Subject		: tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
> Submitter	: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
> Date		: 2008-08-11 18:36 (55 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4
> 		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4

Just for the reference, this one regresses from the 2.6.23. Particular
2.6.26-27 part can be partially fixed by disabling TSO/GSO, since tbench
workload issues quite small packets, and system has no time to
incorporate them into particulary big TSO/GSO frame to get advantage of
this technology. The most noticeble perfromance drop was between 23 and
24 kernels. I work on this issue.
 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
> Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
> Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (66 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
> Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> 		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> 		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>

This one is different, but any other benchmark related to network over
loopback (and in some case over other media) performance degradation
should be very likely handled by the above case.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov

Re: [Bug #11643] ALSA sound/core/pcm_native.c:1947: BUG? (err >= 0)

[Takashi Iwai]

At Sat,  4 Oct 2008 19:32:55 +0200 (CEST),
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11643
> Subject		: ALSA sound/core/pcm_native.c:1947: BUG? (err >= 0)
> Submitter	: sangu <sangu.gnome@gmail.com>
> Date		: 2008-09-24 16:51 (11 days old)

This is unlikely a 2.6.27 regression.
It's a bug to be fixed, though.


Takashi

Re: [Bug #11696] 2.6.27-rc8 doubled times

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday, 5 of October 2008, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11696
> > Subject		: 2.6.27-rc8 doubled times
> > Submitter	: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
> > Date		: 2008-10-03 10:21 (2 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122302939313636&w=4
> > Handled-By	: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122307260621434&w=4
> 
> Can now be closed, thanks Rafael: Linus has taken Thomas's
> commit 07454bfff151d2465ada809bbaddf3548cc1097c
> clockevents: check broadcast tick device not the clock events device
> and I've just confirmed that the latest git indeed fixes the issue.

Thanks, closed.

Rafael

Re: 2.6.27-rc8-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.26

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday, 5 of October 2008, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 07:28:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw@sisk.pl) wrote:
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308
> > Subject		: tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
> > Submitter	: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
> > Date		: 2008-08-11 18:36 (55 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4
> > 		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4
> 
> Just for the reference, this one regresses from the 2.6.23.

Still, tbench results from 2.6.26 are better than from 2.6.27-rc.
That's why it's still on the list, but if you think that's not relevant, please
let me know and I'll drop it.

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #11643] ALSA sound/core/pcm_native.c:1947: BUG? (err >= 0)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday, 5 of October 2008, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Sat,  4 Oct 2008 19:32:55 +0200 (CEST),
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11643
> > Subject		: ALSA sound/core/pcm_native.c:1947: BUG? (err >= 0)
> > Submitter	: sangu <sangu.gnome@gmail.com>
> > Date		: 2008-09-24 16:51 (11 days old)
> 
> This is unlikely a 2.6.27 regression.
> It's a bug to be fixed, though.

Dropped from the list.

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: 2.6.27-rc8-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.26

[Herbert Xu]

Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> > Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308
>> > Subject             : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -&gt; 2.6.28
>> > Submitter   : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
>> > Date                : 2008-08-11 18:36 (55 days old)
>> > References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4
>> >               http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4
>> 
>> Just for the reference, this one regresses from the 2.6.23.
> 
> Still, tbench results from 2.6.26 are better than from 2.6.27-rc.
> That's why it's still on the list, but if you think that's not relevant, please
> let me know and I'll drop it.

Note that 2.6.27 beats 2.6.26 by 30% with bulk traffic over
loopback as opposed to the small packets sent by tbench where
I saw a 5% drop in performance on my machine.

So I'm not sure whether this should really be classified as
a regression if we limit ourselves to the changes between 26
and 27.

The changes prior to 26 seem to be more significant.

Chyeers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Re: 2.6.27-rc8-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.26

[Evgeniy Polyakov]

On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 01:02:20PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw@sisk.pl) wrote:
> > Just for the reference, this one regresses from the 2.6.23.
> 
> Still, tbench results from 2.6.26 are better than from 2.6.27-rc.
> That's why it's still on the list, but if you think that's not relevant, please
> let me know and I'll drop it.

I meant it continuously regresses from .23 including 26-27 timeframe.
There were at least two changes in 26-27 which caused tbench regression
in this particular time interval. One of them enabled TSO over loopback
by default, so one can turn it off via ethtools or this patch:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=122263663631600&w=2

another (hopefully) one I'm trying to find out, which is a bit complex
and slow, since e1000 driver changes in the middle of the 26-27
timeframe does not allow my testing machines to boot.

So, there is a regression (partially resolved), but it is only part of
the problem.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov

Re: 2.6.27-rc8-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.26

[Evgeniy Polyakov]

Hi.

On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 07:49:31PM +0800, Herbert Xu (herbert@gondor.apana.org.au) wrote:
> Note that 2.6.27 beats 2.6.26 by 30% with bulk traffic over
> loopback as opposed to the small packets sent by tbench where
> I saw a 5% drop in performance on my machine.
> 
> So I'm not sure whether this should really be classified as
> a regression if we limit ourselves to the changes between 26
> and 27.
> 
> The changes prior to 26 seem to be more significant.

Yes, that's the point, TSO over loopback for big packets or workload
where there packets can be easily combined into big one results in a
fair performance improvement, but for small packets it regresses about
5-10 %. And yes, there are yet unresolved changes which caused bigger
performance degradation.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov

Re: [Bug #11569] Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced

[Andi Kleen]

On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 07:32:54PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11569
> Subject		: Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced
> Submitter	: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
> Date		: 2008-09-02 13:49 (33 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122036356127282&w=4

The problem is actually worse than this description suggests. I updated
the bugzilla entry now.

The new smp_call_function() that is called from panic is quite unsuitable
for this task:
- It allocates memory (not a good idea in panic0
- It complains about interrupt off
- This whole thing breaks at least machine checks

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com

Re: [Bug #11504] reiserfs ����BUG in 2.6.27-rc5

[Randy Dunlap]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11504
> Subject		: reiserfs  BUG in 2.6.27-rc5
> Submitter	: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> Date		: 2008-09-03 16:35 (32 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122045982120138&w=4

Yes, it should remain since it happened recently on 2.6.27-rc8-git6.
Again with blocksize = 1KB.

I don't see any action from the reiserfs developers about trying
to fix this.  Maybe I shouldn't bother testing this.


Here's the BUG dump from 2.6.27-rc8-git6:

calling  init_reiserfs_fs+0x0/0x83 [reiserfs]
initcall init_reiserfs_fs+0x0/0x83 [reiserfs] returned 0 after 0 msecs
ReiserFS: cciss/c0d0p4: found reiserfs format "3.6" with standard journal
ReiserFS: cciss/c0d0p4: using journaled data mode
ReiserFS: cciss/c0d0p4: journal params: device cciss/c0d0p4, size 8125, journal first block 66, max trans len 256, max batch 225, max commit age 30, max trans age 30
ReiserFS: cciss/c0d0p4: checking transaction log (cciss/c0d0p4)
ReiserFS: cciss/c0d0p4: Using r5 hash to sort names
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/reiserfs/journal.c:530!
invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP
CPU 3
Modules linked in: reiserfs parport_pc lp parport tg3 lpfc cciss ehci_hcd ohci_hcd uhci_hcd [last unloaded: reiserfs]
Pid: 24918, comm: fsx-linux Not tainted 2.6.27-rc8-git6 #1
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa00b3e35>]  [<ffffffffa00b3e35>] reiserfs_in_journal+0xed/0x155 [reiserfs]
RSP: 0018:ffff88017e9bb748  EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000002493 RBX: ffff88017e9bb79c RCX: 0000000000002493
RDX: ffffc20011c97760 RSI: ffffc20011bf21f0 RDI: ffff8801f85a9000
RBP: ffff88017e9bb758 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: ffff880178851800
R10: ffffc20011bf2000 R11: 0000000000000008 R12: ffff88017e9bb86c
R13: ffff88027f07f3f0 R14: ffff880178851800 R15: 0000000000000001
FS:  00007facfc8af6f0(0000) GS:ffff88027f618c80(0000) knlGS:00000000f7f4d6c0
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 00007facfcabf000 CR3: 000000017899f000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process fsx-linux (pid: 24918, threadinfo ffff88017e9ba000, task ffff8801796ce810)
Stack:  ffff880178851800 0000000000000493 ffff88017e9bb7c8 ffffffffa0096418
 000000116f000080 0000200000000001 ffff8801d78a7640 ffffc20000c74004
 000004837e9bb898 ffffffffa009dd29 0000000005cce34f ffff88017e9bb998
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffffa0096418>] scan_bitmap_block+0x128/0x227 [reiserfs]
 [<ffffffffa009dd29>] ? reiserfs_update_sd_size+0x297/0x2a9 [reiserfs]
 [<ffffffffa0097160>] reiserfs_allocate_blocknrs+0x87e/0xa94 [reiserfs]
 [<ffffffffa00acedd>] ? search_for_position_by_key+0x165/0x2c7 [reiserfs]
 [<ffffffffa009e341>] reiserfs_get_block+0x3b8/0xf67 [reiserfs]
 [<ffffffff802ba86c>] __block_prepare_write+0x1b9/0x39c
 [<ffffffffa009df89>] ? reiserfs_get_block+0x0/0xf67 [reiserfs]
 [<ffffffff8027991e>] ? __inc_zone_page_state+0x29/0x2b
 [<ffffffff802baafb>] block_write_begin+0x7d/0xcd
 [<ffffffffa00a0071>] reiserfs_write_begin+0x13d/0x1c6 [reiserfs]
 [<ffffffffa009df89>] ? reiserfs_get_block+0x0/0xf67 [reiserfs]
 [<ffffffff8026e1c4>] generic_file_buffered_write+0x14b/0x636
 [<ffffffff802396ea>] ? current_fs_time+0x22/0x29
 [<ffffffff8026ebb0>] __generic_file_aio_write_nolock+0x352/0x3bc
 [<ffffffff8024f04a>] ? debug_mutex_free_waiter+0x46/0x4a
 [<ffffffff8026ec7e>] generic_file_aio_write+0x64/0xc0
 [<ffffffff80299850>] do_sync_write+0xe2/0x126
 [<ffffffff80278b52>] ? vma_prio_tree_remove+0x42/0xe4
 [<ffffffff8029caa2>] ? cp_new_stat+0xf6/0x10f
 [<ffffffff802475e0>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
 [<ffffffffa00a0b7c>] reiserfs_file_write+0x38/0x4d [reiserfs]
 [<ffffffff8029a029>] vfs_write+0xae/0x157
 [<ffffffff8029a537>] sys_write+0x47/0x6f
 [<ffffffff8020bf0b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b


Code: d0 25 ff 1f 00 00 49 8b 94 c2 f8 01 00 00 eb 12 8b 42 10 48 39 c8 75 06 4c 39 4a 08 74 0d 48 8b 52 40 48 85 d2 75 e9 31 c0 eb 63 <0f> 0b eb fe 49 8b 41 18 48 c1 e0 03 48 0f af c8 48 63 c2 48 01
RIP  [<ffffffffa00b3e35>] reiserfs_in_journal+0xed/0x155 [reiserfs]
 RSP <ffff88017e9bb748>
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception



Now why didn't the system reboot?  :(

Re: [Bug #11504] reiserfs ????BUG in 2.6.27-rc5

[Grant Coady]

On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:52:15 -0700, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:

>Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>> 
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> (either way).
>> 
>> 
>> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11504
>> Subject		: reiserfs  BUG in 2.6.27-rc5
>> Submitter	: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
>> Date		: 2008-09-03 16:35 (32 days old)
>> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122045982120138&w=4
>
>Yes, it should remain since it happened recently on 2.6.27-rc8-git6.
>Again with blocksize = 1KB.
>
>I don't see any action from the reiserfs developers about trying
>to fix this.  Maybe I shouldn't bother testing this.
>
>
>Here's the BUG dump from 2.6.27-rc8-git6:
>
>calling  init_reiserfs_fs+0x0/0x83 [reiserfs]
>initcall init_reiserfs_fs+0x0/0x83 [reiserfs] returned 0 after 0 msecs
>ReiserFS: cciss/c0d0p4: found reiserfs format "3.6" with standard journal
>ReiserFS: cciss/c0d0p4: using journaled data mode
>ReiserFS: cciss/c0d0p4: journal params: device cciss/c0d0p4, size 8125, journal first block 66, max trans len 256, max batch 225, max commit age 30, max trans age 30
>ReiserFS: cciss/c0d0p4: checking transaction log (cciss/c0d0p4)
>ReiserFS: cciss/c0d0p4: Using r5 hash to sort names
>------------[ cut here ]------------
>kernel BUG at fs/reiserfs/journal.c:530!
>invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP
>CPU 3
>Modules linked in: reiserfs parport_pc lp parport tg3 lpfc cciss ehci_hcd ohci_hcd uhci_hcd [last unloaded: reiserfs]
>Pid: 24918, comm: fsx-linux Not tainted 2.6.27-rc8-git6 #1
>RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa00b3e35>]  [<ffffffffa00b3e35>] reiserfs_in_journal+0xed/0x155 [reiserfs]
>RSP: 0018:ffff88017e9bb748  EFLAGS: 00010246
>RAX: 0000000000002493 RBX: ffff88017e9bb79c RCX: 0000000000002493
>RDX: ffffc20011c97760 RSI: ffffc20011bf21f0 RDI: ffff8801f85a9000
>RBP: ffff88017e9bb758 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: ffff880178851800
>R10: ffffc20011bf2000 R11: 0000000000000008 R12: ffff88017e9bb86c
>R13: ffff88027f07f3f0 R14: ffff880178851800 R15: 0000000000000001
>FS:  00007facfc8af6f0(0000) GS:ffff88027f618c80(0000) knlGS:00000000f7f4d6c0
>CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
>CR2: 00007facfcabf000 CR3: 000000017899f000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
>DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>Process fsx-linux (pid: 24918, threadinfo ffff88017e9ba000, task ffff8801796ce810)
>Stack:  ffff880178851800 0000000000000493 ffff88017e9bb7c8 ffffffffa0096418
> 000000116f000080 0000200000000001 ffff8801d78a7640 ffffc20000c74004
> 000004837e9bb898 ffffffffa009dd29 0000000005cce34f ffff88017e9bb998
>Call Trace:
> [<ffffffffa0096418>] scan_bitmap_block+0x128/0x227 [reiserfs]
> [<ffffffffa009dd29>] ? reiserfs_update_sd_size+0x297/0x2a9 [reiserfs]
> [<ffffffffa0097160>] reiserfs_allocate_blocknrs+0x87e/0xa94 [reiserfs]
> [<ffffffffa00acedd>] ? search_for_position_by_key+0x165/0x2c7 [reiserfs]
> [<ffffffffa009e341>] reiserfs_get_block+0x3b8/0xf67 [reiserfs]
> [<ffffffff802ba86c>] __block_prepare_write+0x1b9/0x39c
> [<ffffffffa009df89>] ? reiserfs_get_block+0x0/0xf67 [reiserfs]
> [<ffffffff8027991e>] ? __inc_zone_page_state+0x29/0x2b
> [<ffffffff802baafb>] block_write_begin+0x7d/0xcd
> [<ffffffffa00a0071>] reiserfs_write_begin+0x13d/0x1c6 [reiserfs]
> [<ffffffffa009df89>] ? reiserfs_get_block+0x0/0xf67 [reiserfs]
> [<ffffffff8026e1c4>] generic_file_buffered_write+0x14b/0x636
> [<ffffffff802396ea>] ? current_fs_time+0x22/0x29
> [<ffffffff8026ebb0>] __generic_file_aio_write_nolock+0x352/0x3bc
> [<ffffffff8024f04a>] ? debug_mutex_free_waiter+0x46/0x4a
> [<ffffffff8026ec7e>] generic_file_aio_write+0x64/0xc0
> [<ffffffff80299850>] do_sync_write+0xe2/0x126
> [<ffffffff80278b52>] ? vma_prio_tree_remove+0x42/0xe4
> [<ffffffff8029caa2>] ? cp_new_stat+0xf6/0x10f
> [<ffffffff802475e0>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
> [<ffffffffa00a0b7c>] reiserfs_file_write+0x38/0x4d [reiserfs]
> [<ffffffff8029a029>] vfs_write+0xae/0x157
> [<ffffffff8029a537>] sys_write+0x47/0x6f
> [<ffffffff8020bf0b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
>
>Code: d0 25 ff 1f 00 00 49 8b 94 c2 f8 01 00 00 eb 12 8b 42 10 48 39 c8 75 06 4c 39 4a 08 74 0d 48 8b 52 40 48 85 d2 75 e9 31 c0 eb 63 <0f> 0b eb fe 49 8b 41 18 48 c1 e0 03 48 0f af c8 48 63 c2 48 01
>RIP  [<ffffffffa00b3e35>] reiserfs_in_journal+0xed/0x155 [reiserfs]
> RSP <ffff88017e9bb748>
>Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
>
>
>
>Now why didn't the system reboot?  :(

Did you unload the live filesystem's module above?  May it's a case of 
don't do that?

Grant.

Re: [Bug #11504] reiserfs ????BUG in 2.6.27-rc5

[Jeff Mahoney]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Grant Coady wrote:
> Did you unload the live filesystem's module above?  May it's a case of 
> don't do that?

When the file system is mounted, the module count is incremented. You
can't remove the module underneath a live file system.

- -Jeff

- --
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkjqc2cACgkQLPWxlyuTD7ICtwCfabHYk34DH5pFDQyChfxpokdx
/EsAn1bpcobk7oLu1K0OwrzWIXj3r08e
=2yov
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Nick Piggin]

On Sunday 05 October 2008 04:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
> Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
> Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (66 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
> Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> 		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> 		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>

Curious: what's happening with this one, handlers? Any progress being made?

Re: [Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine.

[Nick Piggin]

On Sunday 05 October 2008 04:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224
> Subject		: Only three cores found on quad-core machine.
> Submitter	: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
> Date		: 2008-08-01 18:15 (65 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4

Dave, is your CPU2 getting stuck in calibrate_delay? Can you still
reproduce the bug? What if you boot the kernel with lpj=<something sane
like 2666785> in order to skip the calibrate_delay code?

If that helps, can you try adding some printks to narrow down where it
is getting stuck?

Re: [Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue

[Nick Piggin]

On Sunday 05 October 2008 04:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264
> Subject		: Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue
> Submitter	: Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com>
> Date		: 2008-08-07 04:18 (59 days old)

Any progress being made with this one? Dave, Oleg did some pretty
nice looking debugging work that indicates it might be a cpufreq
problem. Have you had a chance to look at the comments in the
bugzilla? Or have you been cc'ed on patches for this?

Thanks,
Nick

Re: [Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine.

[Dave Jones]

On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:18:18AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
 > On Sunday 05 October 2008 04:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
 > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
 > > of recent regressions.
 > >
 > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
 > > from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
 > > (either way).
 > >
 > >
 > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224
 > > Subject		: Only three cores found on quad-core machine.
 > > Submitter	: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
 > > Date		: 2008-08-01 18:15 (65 days old)
 > > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4
 > 
 > Dave, is your CPU2 getting stuck in calibrate_delay? Can you still
 > reproduce the bug? What if you boot the kernel with lpj=<something sane
 > like 2666785> in order to skip the calibrate_delay code?
 > 
 > If that helps, can you try adding some printks to narrow down where it
 > is getting stuck?

This is going to sound strange, but I've forgotten which box that was.
I'm due to reinstall all my test boxes now that the next Fedora beta
has come out anyway, so I'll hopefully figure out by the end of the week :)

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

Re: [Bug #11569] Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced

[Nick Piggin]

On Monday 06 October 2008 17:02, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 07:32:54PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11569
> > Subject		: Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced
> > Submitter	: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
> > Date		: 2008-09-02 13:49 (33 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122036356127282&w=4
>
> The problem is actually worse than this description suggests. I updated
> the bugzilla entry now.
>
> The new smp_call_function() that is called from panic is quite unsuitable
> for this task:
> - It allocates memory (not a good idea in panic0
> - It complains about interrupt off
> - This whole thing breaks at least machine checks

Why doesn't it use something like nmi_shootdown_cpus on panic rather than
the (I guess less reliable and longer latency) smp_send_stop?

Re: [Bug #11608] 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request

[Nick Piggin]

On Sunday 05 October 2008 04:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11608
> Subject		: 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
> Submitter	: John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com>
> Date		: 2008-09-16 23:00 (19 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122160611517267&w=4

As I wrote (and you copied to the bugzilla), this looks a bitflip in
one of the ptes... But no harm in waiting for the reporter to confirm
or disprove before we strike it off the list :)

Re: [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 02:11 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Sunday 05 October 2008 04:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
> > Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
> > Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> > Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (66 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
> > Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> > 		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> > 		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Curious: what's happening with this one, handlers? Any progress being made?

Sadly not much, I can't seem to reproduce :-(

Yanmin, does the wakeup patch I did for oltp help this workload any?

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122194673932703&w=4

Re: [Bug #11569] Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced

[Andi Kleen]

> Why doesn't it use something like nmi_shootdown_cpus on panic rather than

There are unfortunately a couple of BIOS around that hang randomly when
NMIs are used (e.g. common problem on ThinkPads). That broke the neck
of the NMI watchdog too.

But yes if we had some way to distingush these broken systems from
sane ones NMI would be the way to go in panic.

-Andi
-- 
ak@linux.intel.com

Re: [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Dhaval Giani]

On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:48:46PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 02:11 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Sunday 05 October 2008 04:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
> > > Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
> > > Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> > > Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (66 days old)
> > > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
> > > Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> > > 		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> > > 		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > 		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > 
> > Curious: what's happening with this one, handlers? Any progress being made?
> 
> Sadly not much, I can't seem to reproduce :-(
> 

This hits only when sched_compat_yield is set. Sadly, the machine which
did reproduce this for me has gone down. Currently I am away from that
machine for another two weeks. I can try giving it a shot again then.

-- 
regards,
Dhaval

Re: [Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue

[Dave Jones]

On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:23:03AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
 > On Sunday 05 October 2008 04:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
 > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
 > > of recent regressions.
 > >
 > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
 > > from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
 > > (either way).
 > >
 > >
 > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264
 > > Subject		: Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue
 > > Submitter	: Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com>
 > > Date		: 2008-08-07 04:18 (59 days old)
 > 
 > Any progress being made with this one? Dave, Oleg did some pretty
 > nice looking debugging work that indicates it might be a cpufreq
 > problem. Have you had a chance to look at the comments in the
 > bugzilla? Or have you been cc'ed on patches for this?

I'm not convinced that the original report wasn't hardware related.
We had taken a machine check exception already, which shows that something
isn't quite right.  MCEs happening under high load are usually a sign
of thermal/power problems of some sort.

Oleg's comments may still hold true, independant of the report.
I've added Venki to the Cc: as he's recently rewritten considerable
amounts of the ondemand governor (though the workqueue mechanics
are pretty much the same).

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

Re: [Bug #11697] CD tray closes spontaneously after opening it

[Frans Pop]

On Saturday 04 October 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> know (either way).
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11697
> Subject	: CD tray closes spontaneously after opening it
> Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
> Date		: 2008-09-30 10:47 (5 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122277167125264&w=4
> Handled-By	: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>

I have not been able to reproduce this recently. I also don't think it's 
really worth tracking this as a regression as there's still a lot of 
uncertainty as to what the cause is.

Cheers,
FJP

Re: [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages

[Frans Pop]

On Saturday 04 October 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550
> Subject	: pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages
> Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
> Date		: 2008-09-09 10:50 (26 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4
> Handled-By	: Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
> 		  Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
> Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122246533505643&w=4

The structural patch for this from Bjorn got NACKed. AFAIK we're still 
waiting for someone (Bjorn?) to decide whether to go with a simpler patch 
from Rene for .27 and to push that.

For me it was possible to work around the issue by changing a BIOS 
setting, but I expect it will still affect others with similar BIOS 
behavior.

Re: [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Zhang, Yanmin]

On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 17:48 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 02:11 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Sunday 05 October 2008 04:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
> > > Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
> > > Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> > > Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (66 days old)
> > > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
> > > Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> > > 		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> > > 		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > 		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > 
> > Curious: what's happening with this one, handlers? Any progress being made?
> 
> Sadly not much, I can't seem to reproduce :-(
The regression is bigger with more cpu.

> 
> Yanmin, does the wakeup patch I did for oltp help this workload any?
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122194673932703&w=4
I tested it against 2.6.29-rc9 on 8-core stoakley and 16-core tigerton. volanoMark
chatroom number is default 10.
Basically, comparing with pure 2.6.27-rc9, the patched kernel's result has about 2%
regression. Group scheduling is enabled.

-yanmin

Re: [Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine.

[Nick Piggin]

On Wednesday 08 October 2008 02:32, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:18:18AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
>  > On Sunday 05 October 2008 04:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>  > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>  > > of recent regressions.
>  > >
>  > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>  > > from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
>  > > know (either way).
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224
>  > > Subject		: Only three cores found on quad-core machine.
>  > > Submitter	: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
>  > > Date		: 2008-08-01 18:15 (65 days old)
>  > > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4
>  >
>  > Dave, is your CPU2 getting stuck in calibrate_delay? Can you still
>  > reproduce the bug? What if you boot the kernel with lpj=<something sane
>  > like 2666785> in order to skip the calibrate_delay code?
>  >
>  > If that helps, can you try adding some printks to narrow down where it
>  > is getting stuck?
>
> This is going to sound strange, but I've forgotten which box that was.
> I'm due to reinstall all my test boxes now that the next Fedora beta
> has come out anyway, so I'll hopefully figure out by the end of the week :)

That does sound strange ;) But I can't believe that! It would be really
interesting if it was stuck in calibrate_delay, but maybe the backtrace
is just messed up...

If you do manage to reproduce it, I would be quite interested. Otherwise,
I think we can say it's not a showstopper for 2.6.27.

Re: [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 10:36 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:

> > Sadly not much, I can't seem to reproduce :-(
> The regression is bigger with more cpu.

Yep :-(

> > 
> > Yanmin, does the wakeup patch I did for oltp help this workload any?
> > 
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122194673932703&w=4
> I tested it against 2.6.29-rc9 on 8-core stoakley and 16-core tigerton. volanoMark
> chatroom number is default 10.
> Basically, comparing with pure 2.6.27-rc9, the patched kernel's result has about 2%
> regression. Group scheduling is enabled.

Ok, so that didn't help. Thanks for testing!

Re: [Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine.

[Dave Jones]

On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 03:24:40PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
 
 > >  > If that helps, can you try adding some printks to narrow down where it
 > >  > is getting stuck?
 > >
 > > This is going to sound strange, but I've forgotten which box that was.
 > > I'm due to reinstall all my test boxes now that the next Fedora beta
 > > has come out anyway, so I'll hopefully figure out by the end of the week :)
 > 
 > That does sound strange ;) But I can't believe that! It would be really
 > interesting if it was stuck in calibrate_delay, but maybe the backtrace
 > is just messed up...
 > 
 > If you do manage to reproduce it, I would be quite interested. Otherwise,
 > I think we can say it's not a showstopper for 2.6.27.

agreed.  I clearly have too many other shiny toys.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

Re: [Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine.

[Dave Jones]

On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 03:24:40PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
 > On Wednesday 08 October 2008 02:32, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:18:18AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
 > >  > On Sunday 05 October 2008 04:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
 > >  > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
 > >  > > of recent regressions.
 > >  > >
 > >  > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
 > >  > > from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
 > >  > > know (either way).
 > >  > >
 > >  > >
 > >  > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224
 > >  > > Subject		: Only three cores found on quad-core machine.
 > >  > > Submitter	: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
 > >  > > Date		: 2008-08-01 18:15 (65 days old)
 > >  > > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4
 > >  >
 > >  > Dave, is your CPU2 getting stuck in calibrate_delay? Can you still
 > >  > reproduce the bug? What if you boot the kernel with lpj=<something sane
 > >  > like 2666785> in order to skip the calibrate_delay code?
 > >  >
 > >  > If that helps, can you try adding some printks to narrow down where it
 > >  > is getting stuck?
 > >
 > > This is going to sound strange, but I've forgotten which box that was.
 > > I'm due to reinstall all my test boxes now that the next Fedora beta
 > > has come out anyway, so I'll hopefully figure out by the end of the week :)
 > 
 > That does sound strange ;) But I can't believe that! It would be really
 > interesting if it was stuck in calibrate_delay, but maybe the backtrace
 > is just messed up...
 > 
 > If you do manage to reproduce it, I would be quite interested. Otherwise,
 > I think we can say it's not a showstopper for 2.6.27.

Ok, this can be closed out. 2.6.27 seems to work fine on all the
quad core machines I have in my cube.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

Re: [Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine.

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Friday, 10 of October 2008, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 03:24:40PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
>  > On Wednesday 08 October 2008 02:32, Dave Jones wrote:
>  > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:18:18AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
>  > >  > On Sunday 05 October 2008 04:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>  > >  > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>  > >  > > of recent regressions.
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>  > >  > > from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
>  > >  > > know (either way).
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224
>  > >  > > Subject		: Only three cores found on quad-core machine.
>  > >  > > Submitter	: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
>  > >  > > Date		: 2008-08-01 18:15 (65 days old)
>  > >  > > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4
>  > >  >
>  > >  > Dave, is your CPU2 getting stuck in calibrate_delay? Can you still
>  > >  > reproduce the bug? What if you boot the kernel with lpj=<something sane
>  > >  > like 2666785> in order to skip the calibrate_delay code?
>  > >  >
>  > >  > If that helps, can you try adding some printks to narrow down where it
>  > >  > is getting stuck?
>  > >
>  > > This is going to sound strange, but I've forgotten which box that was.
>  > > I'm due to reinstall all my test boxes now that the next Fedora beta
>  > > has come out anyway, so I'll hopefully figure out by the end of the week :)
>  > 
>  > That does sound strange ;) But I can't believe that! It would be really
>  > interesting if it was stuck in calibrate_delay, but maybe the backtrace
>  > is just messed up...
>  > 
>  > If you do manage to reproduce it, I would be quite interested. Otherwise,
>  > I think we can say it's not a showstopper for 2.6.27.
> 
> Ok, this can be closed out. 2.6.27 seems to work fine on all the
> quad core machines I have in my cube.

Thanks, closed.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr

[Randy Dunlap]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404
> Subject		: BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr
> Submitter	: rdunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> Date		: 2008-08-21 5:52 (45 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4
> 		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4
> Handled-By	: Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller@hp.com>
> 		  James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>

Also happened with 2.6.27-git2.

-- 
~Randy

Re: [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr

[Randy Dunlap]

Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404
>> Subject		: BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr
>> Submitter	: rdunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
>> Date		: 2008-08-21 5:52 (45 days old)
>> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4
>> 		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4
>> Handled-By	: Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller@hp.com>
>> 		  James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
> 
> Also happened with 2.6.27-git2.

and on 2.6.27-git7.

[Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (130 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>

[Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (126 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>

[Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (115 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>

[Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (109 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>

[Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (102 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>

[Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (95 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>

[Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (87 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>

[Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (59 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>

[Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (53 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>

[Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (44 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>

[Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (38 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>

[Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (31 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121922991027344&w=4

[Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121922991027344&w=4

[Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (17 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>

Re: [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Dhaval Giani]

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 12:43:51AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 

Yes, it should still be.

> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
> Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
> Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (10 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
> Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> 		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> 		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 

-- 
regards,
Dhaval

[Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (10 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
		  Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
		  Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
		  Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>

[Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed
and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject		: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2008-07-31 3:20 (3 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4